Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

  1. Very nice, but a little puzzling, as most of the speculative artwork had the NKP unit in the passenger scheme.   Would be interesting to camp along a former NKP line and see how many non-fans notice the loco in service.  Older folks might, but the younger ones are not likely to, anymore than they notice Warbonnets or Belles.  Will an attempt be made to use 8100 with 765 this Summer?
Last edited by Rich Melvin

Sorry, Rich.  It's ugly!

 

The side striping and the colors are beautiful.  I really like it.  BUT.  The uplifting front striping gives the loco a snotty appearance.  I would much prefer the striping to be horizontal all over the loco.  The more I look at it the less I like it, just because of the front treatment.

 

Just my opinion.

 

Tony

Its amazing what a comparatively simple  paint scheme can do when applied in the right places and that a little style goes a long way to making basic two colors more than memorable. A note to Class 1's (especially the monochromatic CSX ), this is how you decorate a locomotive to distinguish your identity.A  "Go Team!" and kudos to NS that is very well deserved for recognizing and preserving the role of history..

Jack, NKP had just 11 PA's, all in the "Bluebird" scheme: 2 for each of the 4 Chicago trains, and 2 for the single-unit St. Louis jobs, with the 11th as a spare.  There were also some dual-service Geeps and RS's, but they wore the freight colors, and took over the remaining varnish in the early '60's.

 

I mentioned the PA scheme  because that is the only one I saw on the sites showing the new paint jobs, before the 1st Heritage unit was released.  If the freight colors were shown also, somehow I missed it.  The freight scheme is certainly the one most folks associate with the NKP.

Originally Posted by Jim Tighe:
  1. Very nice, but a little puzzling, as most of the speculative artwork had the NKP unit in the passenger scheme.   Would be interesting to camp along a former NKP line and see how many non-fans notice the loco in service.  Older folks might, but the younger ones are not likely to, anymore than they notice Warbonnets or Belles.

The livery as done by NS is the scheme I remember most - though, only due to my familiarity with the NKP #514 at Steamtown.  I'm glad NS elected to go with the freight scheme as it seems the route the NKP may have followed.  (Utilizing that logic, however, the PRR engine should be painted a less flattering black).

 

Now... one alternate scheme could've been this (glad it wasn't, but flashier perhaps):



NKP 710

 

What's the story on this scheme for those not very familiar with the history of the NKP?

 

/Mitch

Originally Posted by CNJ 3676:

Mitch:

 

That's the livery of the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis - an entirely different railroad.

 

Bob

Whoops - thanks. 

 

I popped over to RP curious to see previous liveries of the NKP and this engine showed up several times under a search "Nickel Plate", ironically, even for this photo by NS photographer, Casey Thomason:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=62780

 

Was this an oversight from a 2004 Casey or is this engine of NKP heritage, perhaps?

 

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis

 

/Mitch

I think it's just an honest mistake as there's no NKP in the 710's family tree. The locomotive was actually delivered as the NC&STL 710 so the livery is historically accurate for it. NC&STL was subsequently absorbed by the L&N so this would represent an excellent heritage scheme for CSX should that carrier decide to launch a similar program at some future time.

 

Bob  

Why is everyone down on the GE units? I don't work for the rr so I don't know. Is it just because they may not be reliable like the EMD's? From a railfan perspective for me, it's about looks. The older EMD's ( GP7-60, SD40-2, etc ) definitely looks better than the old GE stuff but to me, the wide cab GE's look a whole lot better than today's EMD's. EMD may still be more reliable but they sure don't look as good as they used to.

 

CofG

"The Right Way"

Rich, that's why i said from a railfan's perspective. I know the rr could give a rat's --- about the looks when it comes to reliability. Because I'm not a railroader, I was just wondering why all the engineers hated GE so much. Now I know. Still though, performance aside, the modern GE's look better to me than the current EMD's. Too bad we can't put EMD guts in a GE. I mean hey, people do put Chevy motors in Fords

 

CofG

"The Right Way"

Originally Posted by CNJ 3676:

Mitch:

 

That's the livery of the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis - an entirely different railroad.

 

Bob

Even though it isn't NKP, it is an alternate paint scheme of another road that was folded into CSX via L&N.  NC&StL, which painted its better-known F3, F7, and FP7 road units in a tasteful grey and medium blue scheme with a "bow wave" on the nose, used this attractive dark red and yellow scheme on switchers and geeps.

Last edited by Number 90

Why was the "NYC&StL" in small letters not added to the 8100?

 

Back in the late '50's, I was talking to an NKP engineman about the occasional presence of an RS-3 between two Geeps on the LE&W District main thru Muncie.  Could always tell from blocks away when such a trio was coming, by the shrill t-charger and chug-chug noises that pretty well drowned out the music of the 567's in the Geeps.  Told him I found such a set interesting.  His reply was "Don't need none of them **** ALCO's on this end of the r.r.  Keep 'em back East."

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×