Skip to main content

Happy to see this happening. I'm putting an initial document together for Scott with regard to late era Red Nose E5s. Since the tooling was made for Phase II engines, I assume red noses will be Phase II as well. Thus, I will be recommending Phase II engine names and engine numbers ensuring more prototypically accurate models. 

E5 boosters had my differences between red and black nose timeframes. Some included: E5Bs behind Red nose engines didn't have skirts, had nameless plates, had vertical E5 plates and different markings throughout.

Notice that phases apply to E5A units only. 

@MikeH posted:

I noticed the Santa Fe and Rock Island are plated but the CB&Q is painted.  Wouldn't that CB&Q look even better if it was plated?  I wonder why it's not.  Was that topic covered when they did the first run?

No, E5s were stainless throughout. A complete shroud. No partial stainless parts.

THe SF and RI approach wouldn't look good on E5s. Imagine side plated inserts with non plated skirts/ roof/ nose.

Nonetheless, that approach worked for CB&Q E9s and they sure made them accordingly.

Last edited by SANTIAGOP23

I would like to have the truck skirts on my Run 2 E5 models to match my Run 1 E5 models.

Even though the 3RD Rail tooling is for the Phase II versions of the E5 A, I still want the following Phase I Road numbers & Silver names From Run 2:

E5 A Cab Units

#9911A Silver PILOT Black Stripes

#9910A Silver SPEED Red Stripes

E5 B Booster Units

#9911B Silver MATE (no nose so no stripes if any color)

@SANTIAGOP23 posted:

Happy to see this happening. I'm putting an initial document together for Scott with regard to late era Red Nose E5s. Since the tooling was made for Phase II engines, I assume red noses will be Phase II as well. Thus, I will be recommending Phase II engine names and engine numbers ensuring more prototypically accurate models.

E5 boosters had my differences between red and black nose timeframes. Some included: E5Bs behind Red nose engines didn't have skirts, had nameless plates, had vertical E5 plates and different markings throughout.

Notice that phases apply to E5A units only.

The Burlington removed the E5 names 1952/1953 by simply flipping the nameplates over.  Red nose stripes and faux grill painting began in 1959.

Living near the Burlington racetrack in the 1960's, I don't ever recall seeing black nose stripes on the E's.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque
@TrainBub posted:

Me too !!!!!!  

I’ve already got my MP AB from run 1.  
A MP E6 in Jenks paint would be a fantastic add-on for my MP “empire”. No one has done it in “O” before too !!!!  Email Scott to give us the option !!!!!

(Sorry not to post a picture but I can only find photos that the website will scrub for copyright issues - can’t find a line drawing. No pix of models as no models. 😖)

Cheers

You can always just attach the link!

@TrainBub posted:

Well I’ve “mastered” adding photos into my posts (not so much being a Luddite - just need some guidance on how to do the link).  Please show how to attach a link. That would be very much appreciated !!!  
Thanks

When you have the picture displayed in your browser, tap or right click (depends whether using a tablet or computer) on the url at the top and “copy” the url.  Then in the post you want to include the link, in the “add reply” box click on the [ ]-[ ] icon to the right of the italics (slanted I ) icon.  In the pop up box that opens, paste the copied url in the top box labeled “Url.”  Then in the “Text to Display” box type what you want the underlined link description to be, by default it will be the same as the url.  In the first example below, I typed “Link to picture” and clicked on the “OK” button.  In the second example, I let the text default to the url.

Link to picture

https://www.american-rails.com/images/MP7000.jpg

Last edited by GregM
@GregM posted:

When you have the picture displayed in your browser, tap or right click (depends whether using a tablet or computer) on the url at the top and “copy” the url.  Then in the post you want to include the link, in the “add reply” box click on the [ ]-[ ] icon to the right of the italics (slanted I ) icon.  In the pop up box that opens, paste the copied url in the top box labeled “Url.”  Then in the “Text to Display” box type what you want the underlined link description to be, by default it will be the same as the url.  In the first example below, I typed “Link to picture” and clicked on the “OK” button.  In the second example, I let the text default to the url.

Link to picture

https://www.american-rails.com/images/MP7000.jpg

Thank you so much!!!!

I’ll have to print this info out before I lose it ( because of all the threads I follow)

@GG1 4877 posted:

Have to wait until Scott decides to do the E3/E4.  They have different toof details.  Phase I E5s shared roof details with E4/E3s while phase II E5s share roof details with E6s.

I’d like to see the E3/4s but…….  
😑😑😑Another Campaign that is pushed out to somewhere in the future 😖😖😖 Can the 5-6 molds be modified for the differences ??? That would be extremely advantageous (less $) as fewer roads bought the 3-4s. This means smaller audience to buy and that translates to lower #s for the run.

Last edited by TrainBub

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×