I thought the CAB-1L was a transmit only device. The FCC test reports clearly show that both the CAB-1L and BASE-1L are both transmit and receive devices. They have the capability to transmit and receive. Why design the BASE-!L to transmit and the CAB-1L to receive if it is not being used in that way. I'm sure the Legacy Command Base treats the the CAB-2 and CAB-1L the same as Adrian suggests. So we seem to have a puzzle here. I would be surprised if Lionel went to all the trouble of having the BASE-1L transmit and the CAB-1L receive if it did not serve some purpose.
Adrian would you happen to have a BASE-1L? If so you could see if it is transmitting. If the reverse communications is not used, then it should not be transmitting?
Adrain when you said you said the "base" is transmitting, I am guessing you are using the Legacy Command Base?
I did not know the Legacy Command Base re-transmits every command it receives over 2.4 GHz. I knew it re-sent each command over the serial port. Why would it re-transmit every CAB-2 (or CAB-1L) remote command?
Attached is the operational description of the Legacy Command Base (which is referred to as a BASE2) from the FCC website. From the description you can see that the Legacy Command Base does receive and transmit at 2.4 GHz. Or course it also sends out the 455 KHz track signal.