Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A'cause it's ICRR #382 traveling at warp speed?

A'cause an object traveling straight line is inclined to continue that path until another force overcomes that intial force.... (also see inertia vs momentum)

You are playing "Excentrifugal Forze" much to loudly and your eyeball fluid is rippling the light refractions.    (I do that too )

There is actually a geometric component to this phenomenon that is completely independent of physics. That is, even if the loco is *stationary* it will still be leaning outward on any curve with a gradient. The geometric component exacerbates any physics involved and makes your loco more likely to fling itself off the track from centripetal acceleration.

Using popsicle sticks to bank curves in *flat areas* is helpful, but there are diminishing returns when trying to do it on gradients that are curving. It introduces a more severe twist into the rails, and as soon as the twist is greater than the depth of the wheel flanges over a single truck distance, you have problems. It's worse for longer trucks (3 axles or more) and worse for longer engines with greater distances between trucks. And obviously worse as the curve gets tighter and the gradient gets steeper.

The deep flanges of hi-rail and tubular stuff is helpful for this, and allows more severe gradients in curves than the scale guys can use. I'm betting those tiny flanges mean they have to stick to almost prototype gradient limits in curves.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×