Skip to main content

Since I have finally started building my layout, I would post some progress. So far I am just working on the benchwork frame. I am going to be trying to use a blend of tabletop and open grid. We will see how it turns out. Im certainly excited to finally r making progress. I’ve been collecting trains for almost 25 years so it will be nice to have a place to run them where I do t have to clean up the trains when I’m done! Here are a few pictures of what I’ve got so far. I still have some more framing to do as well as add some braces to the existing frames too.

Tom

Attachments

Images (5)
  • IMG_6170
  • IMG_6169
  • IMG_6168
  • IMG_6158
  • IMG_6154
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Godale03 posted:

Since I have finally started building my layout, I would post some progress. So far I am just working on the benchwork frame. I am going to be trying to use a blend of tabletop and open grid. We will see how it turns out. Im certainly excited to finally r making progress. I’ve been collecting trains for almost 25 years so it will be nice to have a place to run them where I do t have to clean up the trains when I’m done! Here are a few pictures of what I’ve got so far. I still have some more framing to do as well as add some braces to the existing frames too.

Tom

Fantastic - can't wait to follow along

@Jan posted:

What's your minimum diameter going to be?  Unless you're doing a point-to-point design I can't see anything larger than O6x.  With that amount of space I would look at an around-the-wall layout with multiple peninsulas and bump outs.

Jan

My maximum diameter is 108. It will be an around the room track plan with two peninsulas with a 34” turntable and roundhouse as the centerpiece.

Last edited by Godale03

Tom, I really like your plan.  I used Mike g.'s idea for lift bridges at two different levels.  My upper bridge is the Atlas double track Pratt Truss bridge.  The benchwork opening is 0nly 27", but I just figure I will have some landscape beneath each end and the "river" will be the 27" opening.  It isn't the best by far, but it works. 

20250204_200039355_iOS

20250204_200056064_iOS

20250204_200125522_iOS

Attachments

Images (3)
  • 20250204_200039355_iOS
  • 20250204_200056064_iOS
  • 20250204_200125522_iOS
@Mark Boyce posted:

Tom, I really like your plan.  I used Mike g.'s idea for lift bridges at two different levels.  My upper bridge is the Atlas double track Pratt Truss bridge.  The benchwork opening is 0nly 27", but I just figure I will have some landscape beneath each end and the "river" will be the 27" opening.  It isn't the best by far, but it works.

20250204_200039355_iOS

20250204_200056064_iOS

20250204_200125522_iOS

I love your lift bridge. I also have a double Pratt that I am going to need to lift up and out of the way. Nice work!!

@Godale03 posted:

I love your lift bridge. I also have a double Pratt that I am going to need to lift up and out of the way. Nice work!!

Thank you.  I was hoping it would be an inspiration.  I will make one comment about it.  Some forum members were concerned that the bridge would flex diagonally when going up and down.  Mike cut some plexiglass he had on hand and shipped it across the country to me to make an underneath support.  It is sturdy as can be.  Yes, it was thicker than needed, but he had it on hand and offered it so it worked.

Was able to finish the framework today. I still need to add a few supports but it’s ready to cover with plywood. I’m still wrestling with doing some open framework so I can elevate o e of the lower loops of track. I plan on having an upper level, but I’m not sure how much plaster work I want to do. The only issue I have with open benchwork having to fill all the open spaces with plaster cloth and all the mess that comes with it. I am not an artist. 😁 IMG_6202IMG_6201IMG_6200IMG_6199IMG_6198IMG_6197IMG_6196Im thinking of doing some kind of hybrid approach where my elevated sections are open grid and the rest is covered in plywood. Anyway here are some pictures of the progress.

Attachments

Images (7)
  • IMG_6202
  • IMG_6201
  • IMG_6200
  • IMG_6199
  • IMG_6198
  • IMG_6197
  • IMG_6196
@Godale03 posted:

Was able to finish the framework today. I still need to add a few supports but it’s ready to cover with plywood. I’m still wrestling with doing some open framework so I can elevate o e of the lower loops of track. I plan on having an upper level, but I’m not sure how much plaster work I want to do. The only issue I have with open benchwork having to fill all the open spaces with plaster cloth and all the mess that comes with it. I am not an artist. 😁 IMG_6202Im thinking of doing some kind of hybrid approach where my elevated sections are open grid and the rest is covered in plywood. Anyway here are some pictures of the progress.

Rigid insulation 1/2"-1"+ is an option to cover areas for scenery. Cheap and light weight.

One other comment I had- The top of the steps extend past the knee walls. Are you planning on adding open railings? That looks like an accident waiting to happen (especially since you show a bar in your floor plan.... )

I like the track plan. It's going to be a nice layout.

Bob

@RSJB18 posted:

Rigid insulation 1/2"-1"+ is an option to cover areas for scenery. Cheap and light weight.

One other comment I had- The top of the steps extend past the knee walls. Are you planning on adding open railings? That looks like an accident waiting to happen (especially since you show a bar in your floor plan.... )

I like the track plan. It's going to be a nice layout.

Bob

Yes, I plan on adding railings by the stairs. An oversight during construction but will fix… soon.  I wish I had planned that differently so I didn’t have to go back and fix it.

Last edited by Godale03
@Mark Boyce posted:

That really looks great!  I understand your point about not being sure whether to leave open space in the decking for mountains or doing it differently

Mark (and everyone), here is the latest version of the design. It’s one of 2-3 designs we are tweaking, but they’re all pretty close to each other. We’re waiting on some measurements to see if we can add a trestle on the top, but the blue track is 6" higher than the gold track for a 2.3% grade. My thought is that the bottom, peninsula and most of the left side lend themselves more to full decking vs open grid. I say that because of the switches and passing siding on the left, the storage yard and station on the peninsula as well as the yard and TT on the bottom. I can see open grid under the purple grades and on the right side. I can see some open grid under the tunnel and mountain on the top, mostly for access from underneath, but even then, Tom will need to add decking for landscaping. My thought on the left side is to cut the decking along the track with a jigsaw and use risers to raise the grade. Another option is full decking with riser sets from Woodland Scenics.

Tom 2025-02-09t daz

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Tom 2025-02-09t daz

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×