Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I hate to be an armchair detective and jump straight to the worst conclusion, but insurance fraud comes to mind.

He glides onto the track, stops, and immediately turns on his flashers and gets out. Just seems way too convenient to be a pure accident.

Edit: forgot to mention, accident or intentional, I'm glad he got as far away as he did from the crossing. The locomotive threw that car!

Last edited by 0-Gauge CJ

Curt writes: “I wonder if the car was stolen and the “accident” staged simply to gain notoriety, similar to some of the other idiocy that is videoed and posted to social media”

Certainly looks like deliberate criminal behavior. As far as social media goes, this degenerate doesn’t get his face plastered on facegram or any others. No notoriety achieved. He’s anonymous. Probably done for the thrill, like an arsonist.

Last edited by Mark V. Spadaro

I was on the Ashland camera this morning and the chat was trending toward an intentional act.

I watched the incident several times on live rewind and it certainly looked like an intentional act to me. The gates and lights had activated well before the car appeared. Other than brake failure, the driver could have stopped in time. The driver was way too calm as he (?) got out of the car and wandered away. He didn't even go over to look at the car after the crash from what I could see on the north cam.

Gotta feel for the train crew. They don't know who else may have been in the car. If this was intentional, they should press all the charges they can.

Bob

I saw this on Reddit a couple of hours ago before it was posted here. I came over to see if any of you had seen this video because after watching it two/three times I just didn't understand what I was watching. Like everyone said, it looked like he/she just drove on to the track, opened the door, got out and calmly just walked away. I was wondering if there was something more to this that I missed. Obviously not.

@superwarp1 posted:

While we discuss what the idiot in the car was doing, this is an engineer’s worst nightmare come true. I know I had a passenger car with children in it; one afternoon go around the gates. The mother was late and thought she could beat us, my GG-1 did not stop as fast as she thought it might, we dragged her car for a mile and a quarter. This was the most traumatic day of my life.

Just remember, there are always two victims and one of them has no choice.

Last edited by ThatGuy
@third rail posted:

Definitely looks like a carjacker dumping the car and nonchalantly walking away.  He didn't look back, didn't film it with his camera , didn't care about how much damage he inflicted to the train, the car and the crossing gates.  There aren't a lot of good intentioned people out at 3:15am.

If you look closely on first view it does appear just as he gets out of view he is turning around to watch, he also deliberately went around the dropping gate at the beginning.

3:15 in the morning no witness is his thinking, probably had no idea of the cameras

Sure looks deliberate.  However, maybe drunk/on drugs?  People do really stupid things when high.  Here it looks like they may have initially thought they could beat the gate but got caught between them.  Then their foggy mind could only come up with leaving the car with the flashers on.  Notice they didn't run away, and they did slow down and looked back.  Watch the person's actions closely; just getting away from the crash.

Or a good act.

Last edited by CAPPilot
@CAPPilot posted:

Sure looks deliberate.  However, maybe drunk/on drugs?  People do really stupid things when high.  Here it looks like they may have initially thought they could beat the gate but got caught between them.  Then their foggy mind could only come up with leaving the car with the flashers on.  Notice they didn't run away, and they did slow down and looked back.  Watch the person's actions closely; just getting away from the crash.

Or a good act.

Interesting angle.

@Hot Water posted:

Police have subsequently confirmed that it was a male.

Do you have a news story or link to a police report? I would like to see how this ends.

@ed davis posted:

It happened at 3:16 AM. The driver probably had 1 too many at the local pub. Do railroads send bills to these idiots who cause damage to the locomotives, crossing gates, etc?

Maybe he had intoxicants on board, but it certainly looked like deliberate behavior, not drunken carelessness or stupidity. He even turned on his flashers!

@eddie g posted:

How did the person know a train was coming? Maybe the person was sitting there for hours waiting for a train.

Eddie......the wait would not have been too long......it's a well know section of track, very busy and averages more a train per hour over a 24 hr period. That area is the setting for Ashland Rail Days a festival that we (the River City 3 Railers) participate in by bringing one of our modular layouts to display (next one is April 29th, the weekend after York).

Peter

I hit several vehicles when I was an engineer, and each time, I instinctively put the train in emergency, but thinking back, I have to ask my self..  why?  The damage was done, why risk more damage or a derailment, all it did was save a little walking.  Never was addressed in any training I ever recieved from the railroad. A normal stop or full service would have been sufficient, for the lawyers maybe.

One thing to note is the crossing arms are only on the direction of traffic side of the road - I mean, there aren't gates completely blocking both lanes on both sides. It isn't like the person got stuck in the middle and panicked, the road ahead of them was clear. They get out and walked away; they don't even look back when the train hits the car.

I agree it seems unlikely it would be insurance fraud since they did it at such an open spot - even if it wasn't for the railfan cameras, it's a brightly lit mid-town crossing. I'm sure they could have found a remote spot a few miles (blocks?) away without flashers and gates where not seeing the train coming would have seemed more plausible.

BTW very surprised police think it was a man? To my eye seems more likely to be female. That also makes it more likely to have been a revenge thing than a teen doing a stunt. Stealing a car and getting it smashed or something like that would be more a 'guy thing' I think.

Last edited by wjstix

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×