Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

We had both open deck and ballasted deck girder bridges on the NYSW when I worked there.

It depends on what you want, but if you are building a ballasted deck, you can use regular track (Gargraves, Ross, Atlas, Lionel, etc.) and continue the ballast straight across as if no bridge was present.

If you want a realistic open deck bridge, you'll need trestle track, which iirc, is exclusively Gargraves. It has longer ties, and guardrails built into the track bed. It doesn't have any cap timbers (the wood that runs longitudinally along the edge of the timbers/ties), but you can glue in some strip wood if you want that detail.

The trestle track comes in 37" sections, just like regular Gargraves track. As it is wider than regular track, make sure your bridge is wide enough to accept it.

That looks like a prime candidate for ballasted deck. I would suggest that you do indeed extend the track bed over the bridge.

Most bridges I've seen over water are the open-deck variety, but the PRR had ballasted ones over the Elizabeth River, and two over the Rahway River in New Jersey. Amtrak/NJ Transit still goes over them, and you can see them on Google Maps.

Also, are you putting the foam over the masonite, or vice-versa?

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×