Skip to main content

If I got this right, an operator needs the latest (as of Nov. 12) Cab3 upgrade to run the Triplex using 4-digit addressing; however, with the 990 (CabII) the engine will run fine so long as an operator uses 2-digit addressing.

In Sean's case however, the latest Cab3 (as of Nov. 12) upgrade did not fix the issue of engines running out of sync using 4-digit addressing, but it does work using 2-digit addressing, yet Dave Olson suspects hardware problem and recommends sending it back in.

I cringe at this thought: are the odds favorable that there's a hardware issue with every single triplex and therefore a total recall would be prudent and ethical? While it's anecdotal, the only method I can think of to prove otherwise is if someone reports successful out of the box (meaning not sent back to Lionel) operation using 4 digit addressing via the latest Cab3 (as of Nov. 12) update. Thus far, no review that I've read as reported this success. I honestly hope someone can prove me wrong.

Last edited by Paul Kallus

So if this is the case that Sean’s Triplex has a hardware issue that was only discovered using the Cab3, how do you detect the issue without a Cab3? I do not have a Cab3, only use Cab2.  Does that mean it runs fine for me (all functional) but if I sell it to someone with Cab3 using 4 digit addressing, it does not have full functionality?

@Paul Kallus posted:

If I got this right, an operator needs the latest (as of Nov. 12) Cab3 upgrade to run the Triplex using 4-digit addressing; however, with the 990 (CabII) the engine will run fine so long as an operator uses 2-digit addressing.

In Sean's case however, the latest Cab3 (as of Nov. 12) upgrade did not fix the issue of engines running out of sync using 4-digit addressing, but it does work using 2-digit addressing, yet Dave Olson suspects hardware problem and recommends sending it back in.

I cringe at this thought: are the odds favorable that there's a hardware issue with every single triplex and therefore a total recall would be prudent and ethical? While it's anecdotal, the only method I can think of to prove otherwise is if someone reports successful out of the box (meaning not sent back to Lionel) operation using 4 digit addressing via the latest Cab3 (as of Nov. 12) update. Thus far, no review that I've read as reported this success. I honestly hope someone can prove me wrong.

Without something like a full recall and certificate of repair, it's going to make the resale market a crapshoot on these Triplexes (and maybe other 4-digit addressing locos) as the problems are uncovered by only those that have a Base3.

@John Hon posted:

So if this is the case that Sean’s Triplex has a hardware issue that was only discovered using the Cab3, how do you detect the issue without a Cab3? I do not have a Cab3, only use Cab2.  Does that mean it runs fine for me (all functional) but if I sell it to someone with Cab3 using 4 digit addressing, it does not have full functionality?

You can't really.  Like I said in 2D mode it works perfect, and I have run it a lot.  So, you wouldn't know.

Not sure what the hardware issue could be, but it is not fully functional in 4D mode at this point, so I am waiting for Lionel to respond to my TalktoUs e-mail I sent saying the update did not work and get a return auth.

You can't really.  Like I said in 2D mode it works perfect, and I have run it a lot.  So, you wouldn't know.

Not sure what the hardware issue could be, but it is not fully functional in 4D mode at this point, so I am waiting for Lionel to respond to my TalktoUs e-mail I sent saying the update did not work and get a return auth.

I am totally confused.    2 digit addressing works, 4 digit does not.   Software or Hardware?    Send it in or not?       I asked Ryan Kunkle to provide an official communication, is this a software or hardware issue?   Do all Triplexes need repair or just some?   We need a an official response as to how to move forward.  

@Alabama Joe posted:

I am totally confused.    2 digit addressing works, 4 digit does not.   Software or Hardware?    Send it in or not?       I asked Ryan Kunkle to provide an official communication, is this a software or hardware issue?   Do all Triplexes need repair or just some?   We need a an official response as to how to move forward.  

I agree. How would we determine if it is not functional if we don’t use (have) Cab3 ( 4 digit addressing) ? Running with Cab2 is fine. We normally would test run an engine and if something doesn’t work correctly we would send it in for repair. This is a bit different because all of us don’t have Cab3 to operate it.

Sent mine back and did not use four digit addressing  Didnt even change the address   Used it as 01   After running for about an hour the tender drivers stopped turning and the drivers under the boiler continued to turn  Hit reset and it started working  Then it did it again and again    Ran it awhile longer and when I stopped the engine the boiler wheels stopped and the Tender wheels kept going

I was hoping Lionel successfully repaired one and sent it back to the owner? I am beginning to think whether Lonel even have a proper solution to this issue? I saw comments on youtube that suggested that Lionel can't repair this problem. I am holding off buying one till someone can confirm that it was fixed properly.

Add Reply

Post
This forum is sponsored by Lionel, LLC
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×