Skip to main content

Hi all,

First of all, I hope this is the correct forum for this topic. I'm assuming this is correct since it has to do with PS3 technical stuff. If not, my apologies.

My question is, has anyone else noticed a drop in PS3 audio quality on recent release ex-MTH Atlas O models?  I personally own two Atlas SD70ACe's, one Atlas ES44DC, and one Atlas P42DC.  To compare against, I have a few MTH SD70ACe's from 2014-2019, an MTH P42DC from 2014, and a few other pre-2020 MTH diesels.

In every case, the older MTH model has noticeably richer, fuller sound, especially at higher volumes.  By comparison, the Atlas models sound a bit tinny/grainy/distorted regardless of volume.  If it was just one model, I would think it had a bad speaker. The Atlas models are fantastic in every other regard, but the sound issue is a little disappointing.  Is this just me, or has anyone else noticed the same?  And what could be the change causing this?  Did they switch speaker brands?

Regards

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Paul,

Thanks for the reply.  That's what I had assumed, which is why I wondered at the change.

Actually, now that you ask that, I realized I do have a current release MTH AC4400CW and it too sounds more tinny and less full and bass-filled compared to earlier PS3 engines.  I don't have an earlier AC4400CW to compare it to, though.

As specific comparisons, I have an Atlas BNSF SD70ACe and an MTH BNSF SD70ACe from 2014, as well as an Atlas NS SD70ACe and an MTH NS SD70ACe from 2018, and finally an Atlas P42DC and an MTH P42DC from 2013.  In each case, there's a marked difference in bass and distortion at higher volumes between the two, with the older PS3 engines winning out.

I realize sound quality is impacted by the sound file, board drivers, speakers, sound enclosure, and more.  It does seem like something must have changed in the production on MTH's end lately.  I should add that the Atlas models sound ok on their own - it's not like they're terrible by any means, but are noticeably different when compared to the older models.

It would be a hassle, but.....

you could put the sound set in for an engine that you like (ie SD70ACe) and see if the sound is the same. I have a feeling it's the sound set that you're hearing the difference on.

I have a few engines from the past that drive me nuts. The AC6000, for example, was loud and didn't match others in the consist. I always had to adjust volumes to even them up.

Older MTH diesels used a different speaker. The newer ones have a better speaker IMO (identified by a rubber surround).

So, it should sound better, all being equal.

Both have the same sound set except for the horn.  Here’s a video comparison.  #1145 is Atlas and #1111 is MTH.  I find the exact same results with the BNSF pair and the P42 pair.  Also, both engines are at max volume in the videos.

I think the bass is the big difference.  The older ones have far more bass for some reason.  If I didn’t know I would say they have a higher speaker wattage, but I know (I think) that’s not the case.

Attachments

Videos (1)
IMG_6445
Last edited by Catonsville Central Railway

I wonder if you could swap in a speaker from an older MTH engine into the Atlas engine; just to try it to see if there is any difference in the sound or check the speaker enclosure and mounting between the older MTH and new Atlas models?

I have on some MTH model engines moved the speaker from the powered unit to the trailing dummy unit enclosing the speaker in a stiff cardboard tube as a larger speaker chamber; mounted inside the length of the body which has significantly increased and improved the overall sound and bass sounds.  Just a simple plug between the units.

I have a number of the new Atlas Premier (nee MTH Premier) PS3 SD70 and ES44 engines.  And many more of older MTH PS3 engines for comparison.  When the first Atlas Premier arrived, I felt there was a noticeable improvement in the PS3 sound sets.  Maybe just my ears, but Atlas sounded clearer and lacked the occasional buzz I hear in the older MTH engines.  I'm assuming it is because Atlas has, at least that I perceive, a better standard for quality output from the common factory.  The two D-Day SD70 engines come to mind.   That perception also is influenced by outstanding Atlas Warranty Service which performed a two-week turnaround on an out of the box Premier board problem and even called me to explain what the problem was, the repair solution and the return shipping details.  To me, Atlas PS3 sound sets are more pleasing.

@Stinky1 posted:

PS3 and PS2 have always sounded tinny and thin to me. I often run engine sounds off because it gets fatiguing on my ears. My Atlas PS3 SD70 sounds like typical PS3.

Better speakers and enclosures would do wonders for the bass and give more realistic sound.  The PS/3 board should be able to generate good sound, it's the speakers and the sound file that limit what you get.

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

This comment is not a pile on but another issue I have seen with the new Atlas engines in reference to the PS3. There is a difference in the DCS signal strength/pickup as weaker in the new Atlas engines.  The new Atlas engines have response issues on the layout where the older PS3 MTH versions don't.

I don't blame Atlas as they are just buying parts. It could be as simple as a change in component manufactures that have different tolerances. It also could be the engine has not as good of grounding and has nothing to do with the boards. I had a new MTH "shinny" Big Boy that had issues and fixing/adding grounds to the wheels resolved its issues so it would run/respond the same as the older versions of the Big Boy MTH had released. I have not had time to really look at the new SD70ace's to see why they act differently. On smaller layouts I'm not sure you will see this issue, but on large layouts where you are pushing signal strength, it will show up.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×