Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Many years ago some DYI-guy finished the basement in the house we now own. He laid 2X2 plates (for stud wall) directly on the concrete floor and by now there is some obvious rot on some of it. Has been many years though. 

 

I'd do what Clem K did: drill a hole in the bottom of each leg and install a screw-thread leveler. Kill two birds with one stone (leveling and rot prevention) :~)

 

Lew

geysergazer posted:

Many years ago some DYI-guy finished the basement in the house we now own. He laid 2X2 plates (for stud wall) directly on the concrete floor and by now there is some obvious rot on some of it. Has been many years though. 

 

I'd do what Clem K did: drill a hole in the bottom of each leg and install a screw-thread leveler. Kill two birds with one stone (leveling and rot prevention) :~)

 

Lew

And if you're talking about putting studs vertically up against a concrete wall, get a small roll of adhesive ice and water shield (Grace) and run it along the side of the stud facing the wall.  

Popi posted:

I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that when building benchwork, lumber in direct contact with concrete is not a good idea, as the lumber will dry out and start to rot sitting on the concrete. Is there any truth to this??? Thanks

Popi

It's not that it dries out.  Moisture passes through concrete.  So lumber in contact with concrete can wick up moisture and rot.  It's a cause of concern with foundation sill plates and base plates on walls if you're framing out a basement.  I wouldn't worry about it when it comes to a layout.  If you were concerned about it, the easiest thing to do would be to paint the contact points with some Kilz or put a piece of membrane (Lowe's/HD) in there.  But since the layout isn't entombed (drywall, etc.) the amount of moisture that will get trapped between the lumber and the concrete is miniscule.  As long as the relative humidity in the room is low, it won't be a concern.

We used a star nut, and drilled hole, set in the  bottom/ floor end of Fort Pitt Highrailer modular legs.  An eye-bolt makes a good adjustable leg.  IMO.  The bolts do require some maintenance/oil from time to time. Finger adjustment or a screw driver through the eye-bolt for additional torque, if required.    5/16" or 3/8" eye-bolts, with star fitting will work.   accurate, long/deep, straight hole needs to be drilled in the leg about 4" works best.  

Last edited by Mike CT
Mike CT posted:

Limited concern. Wood framing attached/glued/nailed to concrete (most often the floor) can be done with treated (wolmanized) lumber.    Dry environment/low humidity is a very good idea.  IMO, Mike CT. 

gotta disagree with you on this one Mike, been in construction for many years and using treated lumber in doors is questionable at best

Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:

Limited concern. Wood framing attached/glued/nailed to concrete (most often the floor) can be done with treated (wolmanized) lumber.    Dry environment/low humidity is a very good idea.  IMO, Mike CT. 

gotta disagree with you on this one Mike, been in construction for many years and using treated lumber in doors is questionable at best

Usually treated lumber is wet and the dimension changes as it dries, I would agree to disagree.    

Better choice Redwood if available, or cedar, though cedar tends to have limited structural value.   IMO,  Mike CT.  Older homes, on occasion, you would find Douglas Fir, which appeared to have good integrity after many years.  

Last edited by Mike CT
Mike CT posted:
Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:

Limited concern. Wood framing attached/glued/nailed to concrete (most often the floor) can be done with treated (wolmanized) lumber.    Dry environment/low humidity is a very good idea.  IMO, Mike CT. 

gotta disagree with you on this one Mike, been in construction for many years and using treated lumber in doors is questionable at best

Usually treated lumber is wet and the dimension changes as it dries, I would agree to disagree.    

Better choice Redwood if available, or cedar, though cedar tends to have limited structural value.   IMO,  Mike CT.  Older homes, on occasion, you would find Douglas Fir, which appeared to have good integrity after many years.  

I like that idea of cedar lumber. it would make the train room very aromatic!!

Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:
Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:

Limited concern. Wood framing attached/glued/nailed to concrete (most often the floor) can be done with treated (wolmanized) lumber.    Dry environment/low humidity is a very good idea.  IMO, Mike CT. 

gotta disagree with you on this one Mike, been in construction for many years and using treated lumber in doors is questionable at best

Usually treated lumber is wet and the dimension changes as it dries, I would agree to disagree.    

Better choice Redwood if available, or cedar, though cedar tends to have limited structural value.   IMO,  Mike CT.  Older homes, on occasion, you would find Douglas Fir, which appeared to have good integrity after many years.  

I like that idea of cedar lumber. it would make the train room very aromatic!!

Yes the cedar would be nice as it would bring back a lot of memories on using AF smoke fluid

Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:
Popi posted:
Mike CT posted:

Limited concern. Wood framing attached/glued/nailed to concrete (most often the floor) can be done with treated (wolmanized) lumber.    Dry environment/low humidity is a very good idea.  IMO, Mike CT. 

gotta disagree with you on this one Mike, been in construction for many years and using treated lumber in doors is questionable at best

Usually treated lumber is wet and the dimension changes as it dries, I would agree to disagree.    

Better choice Redwood if available, or cedar, though cedar tends to have limited structural value.   IMO,  Mike CT.  Older homes, on occasion, you would find Douglas Fir, which appeared to have good integrity after many years.  

I like that idea of cedar lumber. it would make the train room very aromatic!!

the other reason I don't like the idea of treated lumber is, years ago before the local municipalities went to transfer sites and we still had local dumps, a friend of ours was in charge of the local dump. he was scavenging scrap wood (including treated), to burn in his wood stove at night. he ended up dying from inhaling the wood smoke from years of burning treated lumber.

mjrodg3n88 posted:

Finished basements have walls...some are built on concrete floors with wood-stud walls and they do not rot.  Like the others have said, if it is not in a damp area, I wouldn't worry about it at all.

Many Codes require that pressure treated lumber be used for the bottom plate when framing a basement. The concern, as others have stated, is the humidity coming up through the concrete floor. Untreated wood will absorb the moisture. However, if the basement is not damp, regular lumber for the layout benchwork will be fine.

Your question and this conversation made me go downstairs and take a look. The layout went up in 1995. I see no warping at all, nor any sign of rot. The wood seems the same as it was when first purchased and delivered .

I'm glad for the cautionary posting, however. It certainly was informative reading the replies here, several of which come from backgrounds and experience far more pertinent to your question than mine.

Ancora Imparo

FrankMIMG_0604cxIMG_0606cx

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_0604cx
  • IMG_0606cx
Last edited by Moonson

I  used to work as a engineer for Portland Cement Association. The only issue with a concrete basement floor and a layout is levelness. Typically the basement floor is poured and formed in the dark because it is done after the first floor is constructed. So the workers are in a unlighted basement trying to slope the concrete floor to a drain.

The eye-bolt idea is a real good one because it lets you continually level the layout if necessary.

Last edited by AlanRail

I used 1/4 x 3 Powers Wedge-Bolts Concrete Anchors in one of my layouts for leg leveling bolts.  Although made for concrete, they work perfectly fine in wood applications too, much like a lag bolt.

The main shank is 1/4" dia., the outside of the threads is actually 5/16" dia.  I probably used a 9/32" dia drill bit for drilling into the leg bottoms (been several years ago now).  A 1/4" dia. hole wood be most likely be a little too tight and risk splitting the wood.

Their BEST feature that I found attractive was the extremely coarse pitch of the threads.  One full turn of the bolt advances it 7/16".  A lot less messing around when turning bolts to level up some framework. 

1/4 x 3 Powers Wedge-Bolts®+ Concrete Anchor Zinc Plated [100)

 

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×