I don't have alot of room and to save space I came up with this loop mountain 3 feet wide with a 4 percent decline to get my train down from the bridge one foot high.
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I'm sorry, I wanted to put this under 'track over track' discussion. Can it be moved?
Really came out great and once the scenery was in place even better. Too bad though you did not have a bit more room for the grade. 4% is a steep grade which will limit the length of trains. The tighter the curves the more chance of cars tipping in on the curves. But still it's impressive............Paul
That looks really good. What's the radius of the curve?
I'm sorry, I wanted to put this under 'track over track' discussion. Can it be moved?
Per your request, I "reported" your thread to the moderator requesting that it be moved to the "track over track" thread.
You can report your own thread by clicking on the triangle image at the bottom of posts by others; there's no triangle in your own posts.
I don't care what section it is in, that is sweet! Shows ingenuity and skills. Makes me embarrassed about admitting I still run them on the floor.
That looks really good. What's the radius of the curve?
I went with 48" curved track, so it was 48 inch diameter, not 36" like I was thinking. Best advice I got was to go with 48", it would have limited my train selection to go any smaller.
Really came out great and once the scenery was in place even better. Too bad though you did not have a bit more room for the grade. 4% is a steep grade which will limit the length of trains. The tighter the curves the more chance of cars tipping in on the curves. But still it's impressive............Paul
I'm sorry, I wanted to put this under 'track over track' discussion. Can it be moved?
Per your request, I "reported" your thread to the moderator requesting that it be moved to the "track over track" thread.
You can report your own thread by clicking on the triangle image at the bottom of posts by others; there's no triangle in your own posts.
I don't care what section it is in, that is sweet! Shows ingenuity and skills. Makes me embarrassed about admitting I still run them on the floor.
Thank you, I am not done, I want to put a coal mine on top of the mountin, with the ON30 rail up there to my coal hopper. The coal hopper is from the '50 and I modified it a bit, but it still runs.
I don't care what section it is in, that is sweet! Shows ingenuity and skills. Makes me embarrassed about admitting I still run them on the floor.
We all got to start somewhere. Here is the 1930-50 set my 80 year old Cousin gave me. I remember going to his house at Christmas and playing on the floor with it.
AZ, your spiral decline inside a mountain is worth its own thread, IMHO. I read your second post before I looked at the photos in your first post. Had I seen the photos first, I probably would have asked you not to relocate it.
Very nice project well-executed.
Was your mountain 3' wide or was the track diameter 3' wide?
Was your mountain 3' wide or was the track diameter 3' wide?
the track is 4 feet wide to allow the use of Atlas 48" curved track. There is a straight section in there to allow the offset to pass under the upper track and exit the bottom. That was the tricky part. trying to keep the height and get the offset. The mountain is slightly bigger following the track.
Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership