Skip to main content

I’ve decided to build a small layout in the basement! I want someplace to run trains other than the floor, or the loop around the top of our bedposts...

 I have decided on a few “preferences”, and my housing situation presents a few hard rules.

We will start with the rules. The layout must be portable, and the sections must be able to fit up the basement stairs. I cannot have something that requires hours of saber-saw work to remove, so sections must unbolt easily. I have a small bedroom sized area to work with, so no wide curves.

Next, the preferences. I will be using Fastrack. Atlas track is tempting, but more expensive and more labor-intensive due to ballasting... GG/Ross also has the ballast issue, and I’ve tried to bend GG track and I just can’t get it smooth. Tubular is dirt cheap, but just doesn’t look realistic enough for me... so Fastrack it is!

Minimum radius will be O-36 due to space issues. Everything I have now runs great on O-36, and if I happen to get rich all of a sudden (not likely) and buy stuff that requires wider curves I can just run it at the club...

Finally, track plan and scenery... I want continuous running, so there will be oval(s) or reverse loops. I also want some sort of switching opportunities, so there will be sidings with industries... I don’t know if I want around-the-walls with reverse loops, or a table in the middle of the room... Scenery will be realistic, but somewhat basic, probably a generic midwesternish somewhat flat theme... I’m not gonna pick any particular era, although my preference in real trains is late steam. I’ve found that small-town-appropriate buildings look good with anything from early 1900’s steam right up to (relatively) modern diesels.

Well, I’m headed off to the drawing table...

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

My plans are changing a little bit… I’m going to go 2-rail instead of 3-rail…

I’m going to do a shelf style around the walls switching layout. The modular/semi-portable rule still applies. Return loops/continuous running is obviously out of the equation (unless I want to run a lift-out section across the open end of the layout).

I’m going for a western New York/western Pennsylvania shortline feel based on the Wellsville Addison and Galeton RR, I’m thinking of basing the layout loosely on Wellsville NY. I lived in Wellsville as a kid in the 90’s, and went to the SUNY tech school campus on the old Sinclair Refinery grounds in Wellsville. The WAG was long gone before I even came into existence, but I still feel an attraction to the shoestring budget, weedy track feel of lines like the WAG…

DA233213-E5FA-4A12-AE7A-0E1CD64807B8

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DA233213-E5FA-4A12-AE7A-0E1CD64807B8

Bringing this thread back from the dead… I really need a more permanent (and toddler resistant) place to run trains than the floor.

The idea of building a 2 rail layout has come and gone. I just don’t have the space for reasonable curves, and I continue to come across great deals on 3R equipment at the club. At this point it just doesn’t make sense to try to switch to 2R.

So step one is to clean up the complete mess that is “my corner” of the basement. Then I can start building.

I’ve thought a bit about size, shape, and track. I’m considering an around-the-walls layout with a lift out section for access. That would allow for wide curves which look much better no matter what the minimum radius of any particular locomotive is. An around the wall design would also allow for narrow “modules” that would fit up the basement stairs easier. On the other hand, I came across an old insert from some other magazine that had an interesting 5x16’ plan that could have potential, but would require curves that my SD40-2 probably won’t negotiate with cars…

As for the track, I’m now leaning towards gargraves. I love the detail of atlas track, but it’s rather expensive (yeah, I know there’s nothing cheap about O, but…). Fastrack looks decent to me, but the noise is probably going to be an issue for me. The cheap option would be Menards tubular, and I have a circle of O72 and a bunch of straights already, but I want a more realistic look. So it would seem that gargraves would be a good compromise… as for the ballast I have no idea why I was concerned about that, I’ve ballasted plenty of N and HO scale track and I enjoyed the process…

I’m considering trying to post a video series on the construction of the layout on YouTube, but I’m not sure if I’m confident enough to go through with it…

Jon, I moved from HO to O gauge 3-rail for the same reason you are dropping 2-rail, space limitation.  I have been working on an around the walls layout with a lift up bridge walk in that is located in an 11x11 room.  I have had success with GarGraves track and Ross switches.  Right now it has 054 curves, but I am considering some inside loop trackage that would be 042.

Are you not confident with making a nice enough video for YouTube or not confident in your layout building skills.  I have been bouncing ideas off everyone on this forum for years, which has helped me with skills I never thought of.  I say, just give it all a try.  Show us a little more what you are thinking of doing.

Hi Jon, you may want to consider using some foam core doors for your layout.  You could see if a local door store has some used ones.  They are light weight and very rigid.  so not too much worry about them sagging or warping.  You can wire each section independently using level wire connectors like those below to link each doors wires to create a circut.  I would buld a frame for the doors to lay on  hope this helps.   Dave

So let’s talk layout design. I really like a small town/branch line/short line feel. Some of my first train ride memories are of the Arcade and Attica RR in western New York in (probably) the late 80’s or early 90’s. I remember places where the train appeared to wander through fields of grass without any tracks… I like the scenery in western NY and PA. Rolling hills, lots of trees, farms, etc.

I’m thinking a double track main would not really fit the “vibe” described above, and would require almost twice as much track, so I’m leaning toward a single track line… I would like to have an interchange  at one “end”, and a few places along the line to deliver cars to (maybe one industry on each wall- I don’t want it to look crowded).  The line would run from the interchange on one side of the doorway around the room to the end of the line on the other side of the doorway. A lift out bridge will allow for continuous running if I just want to watch a train, or for visitors…

As for the modular benchwork I’m thinking 2’x4’ modules would make good use of 4x8 sheets of plywood, but I wonder if it would be better to go with 30” depth… 30” is about the max I would want to try to reach across when building the layout, or maneuver up the basement stairs…

I do like the idea of the doors, but unless I can find someone who is getting rid of a bunch of them for cheap I don’t think it’s going to be very cost-effective…

168C6B74-5547-4F87-9A70-4C4322484552Here’s a little bit better sketch… the room and table dimensions are in scale, the track is free-hand…

The lift out would not be in place for a “switching session”, incoming cars would be dropped on the interchange track by the connecting railroad (the 5 finger switcher). The short line train crew would leave the engine house, retrieve any outgoing cars from the industries and take them to the interchange, swap them for the incoming cars, and deliver those cars to the industries, then head back to the engine house. Having some trailing point sidings and some facing point sidings makes a runaround track necessary and adds a bit of action to the switching… Trains would be 3-6 cars long (1 or 2 cars going to each industry).

Don’t want to mess with all of that? Just drop the lift out in place and watch the train go around in circles!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 168C6B74-5547-4F87-9A70-4C4322484552

A little bit of progress! Three sections of benchwork are done except for the plywood!

4AAFC4D2-E2D3-4D0B-A970-A1873C72BC67


56326531-0CF3-47BB-810A-C785B6DD477E
A little bit of progress on the track plan too! I wanted to see what O72 curves look like in this space and I decided I wanted the sidings to be on the isle-side of the industries for easier access when switching. The interchange still needs work, I want the main to be straightened out, and I’m not putting a switch on the lift out…

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 4AAFC4D2-E2D3-4D0B-A970-A1873C72BC67
  • 56326531-0CF3-47BB-810A-C785B6DD477E

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×