Skip to main content

With new O-gauge layouts I can get individual lengths of straight and curved (various radii) sections or I can go with flex track (I'm considering Gargraves 3-rail).  It seems as though flex track is more economical and has better electrical characteristics but may be hard to design in software and then lay it out perfectly to match the design in practice.  As this is my first layout I thought I'd throw this out to the experts.  What other brand than Gargraves would should I consider?  Tin plate or stainless steel (finished basement)?  Wood or plastic ties make much difference?

I have a plan but it's all in tubular and I want to change the track before I solicit comments. 

Thanks!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Good questions.

I'm building my second major layout with ATLAS - my preferred track for ease of use, looks, quietness, sturdiness and general presentation.  Atlas had some problems with turnouts in the early days (2000-2003 or so), but those problems have long since been rectified.  Some use Ross turnouts (excellent!) with Atlas track - the only problem with that being the two different looks.

I've seen many layouts (and have built four major layouts) and my order of preference for track would be:  Atlas, Ross, Gargraves, Fastrack.  Each has its own strengths - and weaknesses.  I am not a fan of MTH track for reasons of looks and durability (my opinion).

I have to say that I would - in an instant - go with SUPER O track if it were available in a modern track design.  

Both Gargraves and Ross make preformed curve tracks in various sizes. If just starting out I would use these preformed curves. You can always get some Gargraves flex track and try bending it yourself and see how you do. If it works then go for that. If you have trouble you can practice until the time comes for the next layout.

I am with RThomps and am a big fan of Atlas track and switches for the same reasons he lists above. The looks and features of the track is one's own personal preference though so others like many different types of track. Get what you like best and will be happiest with in the long term. 

RT,

  If I was interested in only running post war and modern trains, I would invest in Ross Track and Switches, great stuff however it is costly.  

Having put together many many layouts big and small for myself and many other people, using just about every different manufacturers track,  I run FasTrack with Command Control Wireless Switches and Conventional Lionel Tubular with old 072 switches. Both these Track types accommodate all my Trains, including my Tin plate.  I run Legacy with the Cab2 to operate my FTCC Switches and run DCS with the DCS HHRC.

I do not care if my layout looks realistic, they must run correctly via remote control and conventional means.

Picking Track is a personal engineering preference, just remember some Track does not accommodate all the different manufacturers engines and rolling stock.  Make sure you build for the engines and rolling stock you own, and also what you will want to run in the future.  

Choose wisely,

PCRR/Dave

 

 

Last edited by Pine Creek Railroad

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×