Skip to main content

Those of you who have seen the pictures I posted on the Christmas Layout thread, of the Christmas layout I just put up, can see that I use many operating accessories. Often, I have to reverse to line up cars.

 

I find that reversing through switches/turnouts (hey, real trains do it!!) is one of the hardest things I can get my older PW cars to do....especially using the MTH Realtrax switches I use. I find the switches to be the biggest bugaboo on the layout actually, even when the train are going forward.

 

This year, I am using strictly my PW cars: shoes on them, no shoes, light, heavy- it does not seem to matter. They wheels seem to climb certain parts of the switch. I just spent more than 2 hours this morning using a rotary tool and utility knife cutting and grooving several of those switches....for the most part, the trains are now able to back up, one track anyway.

 

I took one train w/ 8 cards, 6 laps, backwards around an oval w/ 3 O31 switches just to test things out - ran great after the modifications.

 

But I can still run them around the loops, do 5 laps perfect in forward....and on the 6th, one car or another will "hit" a switch wrong and jump over the rail. No rhyme or reason sometimes, it just happens.

 

In some cases, the older cars have wheels that do not "track" or stay in gauge correctly and one wheel on the axle falls inside the inner rail. To solve that, I took small wire and wrapped it around the axle between a wheel and the truck frame. That kept the wheel from coming in too far and derailing.

 

I really think if I had this layout up long enough, I could work on the switches and wheel sets, and get things so that they run fine. For a temp layout, it is not worth the effort, I just want to be able to run for the season.

 

How about you? Do you have to "modify" your turnouts, and if so what brand do you use? I can post picts if any Realtrax user would like to see my solutions.

 

Greg

C&GW RR

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I don't back up trains that often but don't recall any problems, except with Thomas the Tank engine's cars: those seem to sometimes derail going backwards.  I think it is the fixed (non-swiveling) axles.  I have had no problems otherwise, but then I don't use Realtrack - I have Atlas track but have grafted in Fastrack switches in the places I need turnouts, etc.

This is one of the problems of O-gauge, that we don't have stringent wheel and gauge standards as in mainstream HO. Postwar and especially prewar O-gauge is especially loose with standards. And then there were those fat-wheel locos that needed special switches which weren't compatible with other equipment. We still have a lot of the toy-train heritage in 3-rail with the big wheel flanges and huge couplers. I accept it for my mostly vintage O-gauge equipment, but it causes incompatibilities for scale operators and it seriously segments the entire O-gauge/O-scale hobby.

 

The extreme curvature of tinplate-style switches create additional problems. I used pieces of tubing or drinking straws on the axles of prewar cars to help maintain better wheel gauge and enable them to negotiate switches more reliably. The tradeoff with the old toy-train heritage is that most 3-rail equipment can take relatively sharp curves.

 

I don't do much backing-up with my mostly old O-gauge trains because I do mainline running. I often lock out the E-units. AC track power and E-units for sequencing reverse are another anachronism from the toy-train heritage.

Last edited by Ace

cngw,

   I have no problem backing up with my trains, because of the old Lionel 711 and 072

swithces accommodating all my different O Gauge trains correctly including the Tin Plate. I transition in and out of the old switches from FasTrack using a lighted lock on at each switch.  The P2 slow speed allows exacting control while backing up the trains.  Its not so much the trains but the track and switch engineering that I found

to be the real problem.  Once I decided to face the real problem with the track and switches, engineering became a lot easier.   The only switches that accommodate all my different trains running in either direction are the old Lionel 711's or the 072's, combined with FasTrack.    The new K-Line 072 type switches will work also, and they take a lot less power.   My next experimental engineering will be with Ross switches, I am hoping I can get them to accommodate my Tin Plate O guage, in both directions without derailing rolling stock or engines.  Looking at the height of the track gives me some concern however.

PCRR/Dave

 

 

I have no trouble backing through curves, "S" curves, switches, uphill, downhill, whatever, etc.  The secret is, I use all Gargraves Track, properly weight all my rolling stock to NMRA standards, back slowly just like a real train, and keep the wheels clean.  Wheels get gunk in the area between the rolling surface and the flange which allows them to climb a curve and derail.

.....

Dennis

 

I run postwar, mostly with shoes, and I’ve had the same sporadic problems. The nicer stuff I won’t run across switches because ripping a shoe off after 100 good passes still isn’t an option for me. I’ve had the best luck with Lionel’s 022's if the cars can handle the turn radius. If I need something larger, I use Gargraves 42 & 72 radius because I have had good luck with them with only minor alterations. That’s just with postwar; I don’t run modern era.

 

Dan

Originally Posted by Jumijo:

I avoid backing up trains, and also avoid switches. To me, switches are nothing but trouble. A derailment just waiting to happen. 

I have to say, I agree w/ Jumijo on his point. I had twenty 0-72 Lionel switches on the layout. Two locomotives, a scale Lionel Dreyfus Hudson and a Williams Challanger, were particularly fussy over switches, usually de-railing, esp. if backed into them. However, sooner or later, everything had trouble traversing those switches. That is why they are gone - and good riddance, from my perspective (!). Now, only one mainline has just two switches included, and those are Ross switches, which lead into a service yard and were positioned to be approached straight-on w/out requiring movement into the curved part when operating trains outside and passing by the yard.

 

So, yes, for me, from my limited perspective, switches are trouble, and I avoid having them, though I am glad for folks who have no troubles with them, of course.

the 3 dependables enroute

 

5locos

Attachments

Images (2)
  • the 3 dependables enroute
  • 5locos
Last edited by Moonson
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×