Skip to main content

I just found out that we will be moving into a new house.  My inlaws are downsizing and want the house to stay in the family.  I am super fired up over this since the house fits out family better...and...there is a building on the property that is currently a gym.  My wife already told me that I can use it for a layout!  

 

The space I want to use for the layout would be 20 x 19.  I have never built a layout of this size and would like to get some ideas from the forum.  I have Scarm, but have not mastered it yet.

 

I would like to model the late 1940 - early 1950s southwest PA region.  Multiple levels, coal mining, yard, and an engine servicing area are musts.  072 minimum radius, but think I want to go 080 and larger.  Track will be Gargraves with Ross switches.

 

Let's see some ideas!  Attached is a layout I ran across a while back that I really liked.  I cannot remember where I found it...possibly here.

 

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 28 x 15
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

That looks like one I threw together for another forum member a couple of years ago. I'd recommend using Atlas track with Ross turnouts as the Atlas curves are very consistent and the track is easier to keep clean. Atlas offers 40.5", 45", 49.5" and 54" radius (aka O-81, O-90, O-99, and O-108 diameters) for a consistent 4.5" mainline spacing (just keep the Big Boys on the outside). For an almost square layout area, an around-the-walls design might be better, depending on where the doors to the room/area are located. Can you post a sketch of the room?

I'm currently setting up my modules in our 20 x 20 family room- the configuration is an around the walls design, and my modules are 2 x 4 and 2 x 6. I'm using Fastrack to mock up the track plan and to get a feel for how it will look with trains running on it, but I will be using Atlas 2-rail with a center stud rail to provide AC power.

 

I had built an L-shaped dogbone-shaped layout with 072 and 080 curves in this room before, but it was so large my wife grew to hate it and it had to come down. We use this room for other purposes too, so I didn't really mind starting over. Layout 2.0 gives alot more room for relaxing, watching movies and trains, and can be broken down when the entire room is needed.

 

I'm also planning for a lower level and staging yard, but will revise my current track plan to make the yard longer and not intrude into the center as much.

 

Geno

Last edited by 72blackbird
Originally Posted by William 1:

I like it!   It is simple and the elevation change should be interesting.  Super wide radius curves, are they 120s.  I would be tempted to put a spur or two in there for industrial sidings.  What kind of equipment are you planning to run?

 

They look like 120s to me, AGHRMatt designed the layout for someone else and I really liked it.  This is the type of layout I would like to emulate.  And incorporate an engine servicing facility somewhere.  

 

The largest engine I, currently, have is an MTH Premier Pennsy Mallet.  My E8s, F3s and Geeps will see plenty of time as well.  As soon as the boss approves it I will be picking up an M1A and K4.

 

72blackbird posted:

Lshark,

Thanks for the kind words- it would have been nice to use the whole room, but it's better to have an around the walls layout than nothing at all. My wife wanted me to do a shelf layout about 7' off the ground, but I knew I wanted to see my trains at a much lower viewing height.

Geno

We have to keep our hobby wife approved.  Happy wife...

Michael Pellegrino posted:

That layout design is done with fastrack 0-84 outside curve and o-72 inside curve. I like the layout myself but would probably do it in atlas and ross switches.

Oh, it's fastrack?  I am using Gargraves.  I'd like to use Ross switches, but we will see what the budget allows once building begins.  I've read new favorable reviews on Gargraves switches, but I like the variety offered by Ross.

72blackbird posted:

Lshark,

Thanks for the kind words- it would have been nice to use the whole room, but it's better to have an around the walls layout than nothing at all. My wife wanted me to do a shelf layout about 7' off the ground, but I knew I wanted to see my trains at a much lower viewing height.

Geno

We have to keep our hobby wife approved.  Happy wife...

lshark21 posted:

I just found out that we will be moving into a new house.  My inlaws are downsizing and want the house to stay in the family.  I am super fired up over this since the house fits out family better...and...there is a building on the property that is currently a gym.  My wife already told me that I can use it for a layout!  

 

The space I want to use for the layout would be 20 x 19.  I have never built a layout of this size and would like to get some ideas from the forum.  I have Scarm, but have not mastered it yet.

 

I would like to model the late 1940 - early 1950s southwest PA region.  Multiple levels, coal mining, yard, and an engine servicing area are musts.  072 minimum radius, but think I want to go 080 and larger.  Track will be Gargraves with Ross switches.

 

Let's see some ideas!  Attached is a layout I ran across a while back that I really liked.  I cannot remember where I found it...possibly here.

 

 

 

Hi lshark21,

That's jmiller320's layout. Here's a video he posted of a run around during construction. he kept his tables narrow except for the loops. See if you like it running.

What are the room dimensions? It looks like you want to fit it in the right side.

My only comment on jmiller320's plan is that the yard spurs need to be longer if you want to stage complete trains. 4 x 10 is needed for a reasonable operational yard to cut and build trains.   There is space to add engine service, but a turntable/roundhouse will require more layout table. Another 4 x 6/8 area for that.

I also agree that a spur or two would give the train something to do. Coal mine to delivery area.

You could use that plan as a concept and develop your own plan from it. Attached is a quick read to help you determine what will keep you happy with your layout.

Attachments

Our layout is 26x17, and you will be surprised how fast space gets eaten up when you start putting curves in. The engine facility will eat up any and all space you think you have left. Our turntable and roundhouse take up an 8'x8' alone, and that don't count the lead tracks into the TT.

Go with the biggest curves you can fit, don't cram track into every bit of space you have so you can leave room for scenry, and put a few different track plans together as options.

Check out my YouTube videos for layout progress under screen name - Laidoffsick

Laidoffsick posted:

Our layout is 26x17, and you will be surprised how fast space gets eaten up when you start putting curves in. The engine facility will eat up any and all space you think you have left. Our turntable and roundhouse take up an 8'x8' alone, and that don't count the lead tracks into the TT.

Go with the biggest curves you can fit, don't cram track into every bit of space you have so you can leave room for scenry, and put a few different track plans together as options.

Check out my YouTube videos for layout progress under screen name - Laidoffsick

Laidoff,

 

I love the look of your layout!  I have watched many of your videos in the past.  Fantastic modeling!  

Thank you for the feedback.

Michael Pellegrino posted:

LSHARK21

You can probably do that layout with Ross track with Ross Switches. Ross now makes an 0-84 curve. The straight track might be the probably with Ross though 3" 10" 14" 29".  I am not sure if gargraves makes an 0-84 curve or what sizes they have in straight.

Mike

Gargraves has curves from o32 to o138.  They do not have o84 though, it is 80 or 89.  Straights are 6.2, 12.4, 24.8, and 37.  

Moonman posted:
lshark21 posted:

I just found out that we will be moving into a new house.  My inlaws are downsizing and want the house to stay in the family.  I am super fired up over this since the house fits out family better...and...there is a building on the property that is currently a gym.  My wife already told me that I can use it for a layout!  

 

The space I want to use for the layout would be 20 x 19.  I have never built a layout of this size and would like to get some ideas from the forum.  I have Scarm, but have not mastered it yet.

 

I would like to model the late 1940 - early 1950s southwest PA region.  Multiple levels, coal mining, yard, and an engine servicing area are musts.  072 minimum radius, but think I want to go 080 and larger.  Track will be Gargraves with Ross switches.

 

Let's see some ideas!  Attached is a layout I ran across a while back that I really liked.  I cannot remember where I found it...possibly here.

 

 

 

Hi lshark21,

That's jmiller320's layout. Here's a video he posted of a run around during construction. he kept his tables narrow except for the loops. See if you like it running.

What are the room dimensions? It looks like you want to fit it in the right side.

My only comment on jmiller320's plan is that the yard spurs need to be longer if you want to stage complete trains. 4 x 10 is needed for a reasonable operational yard to cut and build trains.   There is space to add engine service, but a turntable/roundhouse will require more layout table. Another 4 x 6/8 area for that.

I also agree that a spur or two would give the train something to do. Coal mine to delivery area.

You could use that plan as a concept and develop your own plan from it. Attached is a quick read to help you determine what will keep you happy with your layout.

I like jmiller320's layout, but do not want to build a copy of it.  The design is a general idea of what I am looking for.  

 

The dimensions of the entire building are about 28x19.  I do want to keep it in the right side of the room.  There is a door that I do no want to block as well as a bathroom.  I also plan to build a work bench for projects.  

 

Man, I think I want too much for the space I have available.  lol   The more I think about it, engine servicing facilities may not fit.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • sketch

Thanks for info. I suppose it depends on what type of layout you want. If you are into a display layout and multiple trains running simultaneously, a dual mainline is nice.

However, a lot of nice layouts run a single mainline with other elements to keep your interest.

Folding a loop and bending it gives the feel of a point to point, while still keeping continuous running. It can cross or elevate.

You have a good list of elements to include.

I'll define the room for you in SCARM with some 089 and 080 circles and some rectangles and squares that you can move around to give you a feel where the elements can fit. A little later though, holiday prep and nephew's birthday party on the schedule.

A balloon on one end (not a reversing loop) can provide a main line turnaround and space for engine service inside. This one in Humboldt, CA was huge and provided that and port service.

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • balloon1952
lshark21 posted:

Wants:  yard to store cars, engine serving facility, smallish town with a passenger station( Atlas 6901), a trolley and warehouse buildings on a siding.  I want it to feel point to point with elevation changes along a two track main with passing siding or two.  

 

 

All that will definitely be tough to do in your space. Like us, you will probably have to make some sacrifices 

Laidoffsick posted:
lshark21 posted:

Wants:  yard to store cars, engine serving facility, smallish town with a passenger station( Atlas 6901), a trolley and warehouse buildings on a siding.  I want it to feel point to point with elevation changes along a two track main with passing siding or two.  

 

 

All that will definitely be tough to do in your space. Like us, you will probably have to make some sacrifices 

Yeah, I think the servicing facility will be out and the yard will not be as big as I would like, but the rest should be doable.  

You can widen the radius of any curve by inserting small straights between sections if they're not available. I'm using Fastrack to mock up my track plan with 060 and 072 curves, but they appear much larger. But I will replace the Fastrack with Atlas 2-rail track. Eventually I will use 45" and 49.5" radius curves.

Geno

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2015 modular_004

JMiller,

Your trackwork looks great as is- I wouldn't change a thing. We all use the curves that we are comfortable with, so if 072 and 084 curves work for you, that's great. I run Atlas 89' flatcars and Articulated autoracks, and Lionel Autoracks soon too, so I wanted the largest curves that will minimize the ovehang on long cars.

I built my curved modules to take 45" and 49.5" wide radius curves, but really the straight runs are only 24" deep and are up against the wall. The one doorway into the train room is in the corner, and I'll have a hinged bridge to allow access into the room.

Geno

The SCARM files are not that large.

Anyway, I was able to get pic. Change the switch to a Ross #4 and then use  2- 4 way yard switches. This gives you a pass-through yard for staging complete trains. Move the switch on the bottom further over and possibly the entrance switch across the table to give you a long lead.

Open two instances of SCARM and copy and paste this to your file.

File attached, right-click>select "save target as"> save to your computer and open with SCARM.

You can make a ladder with a series of #4's if you want a car yard instead.

Attachments

Last edited by Moonman

I just tried it, the export function creates a large file, both as .bmp or .jpg. I use the "snipping tool" in Windows. It creates a jpg of the layout like a screen shot that's about 1/4 file the size. You just drag a rectangle around whatever you want off the screen and save as with a name and file type. I use the jpg.

The whole SCARM file is smaller, also.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×