So if it's acceptable to monitor the problem (rather than fix it), I think RJR's approach would be an inexpensive way to control 5 additional switches per AIU (using 10 ACC ports). In other words, once the monitor circuit detects a latched ON relay, it signals the user, and the user must navigate to the offending or latched-on ACC relay and clear it. As I figure it, one would assign a switch to two ACC ports calling them, say, Switch Straight and Switch Turnout. Then select one and press ACT button (not ON button).
![Untitled Untitled](https://ogrforum.com/fileSendAction/fcType/0/fcOid/64499421604912370/filePointer/64640221071890242/fodoid/64640221071890238/imageType/MEDIUM/inlineImage/true/Untitled.jpg)
This would allow both AIU control and simultaneous manual control using existing lever-switches which the OP suggests is a requirement in one of his posts.
There is a somewhat humorous TV commercial from Lifelock security company along the lines of "Why monitor a problem if you can fix it."
As I see it, since it would be extremely difficult to reverse-engineer the TIU/AIU to automatically fix (clear) an ACC latched relay, it would have to be done with external circuitry probably including new relays. Again, not particularly expensive (using $1 per relay eBay modules), but somewhat a hassle to implement and an AIU is "only" about $100 and gets you 10 more switch ports.