Skip to main content

I agree with people who maintain that $125 is too much for layout cars, but there are exceptions, and I allowed myself one as a Christmas gift to myself.

 

This 1955 Buick looks identical to one my uncle had - I'll call that the excuse.  However, truth is I set out to buy a '55 car; my layout is supposed to represent 1955, and I had too few "this year's model" on the layout.  

 

I'll also add that I much prefer 1/43 cars (to 1:48) as the slightly larger size looks better in my eyes on the layout, particularly around big, scale locos - regardless of what the real-world situation was I like the slightly larger cars.  But it's hard to find good mid-50s normal (non-exotic, not expensive) cars and Brooklin makes many.

 

Anyway, this is a fairly good model.  It is exactly 1:43 scale, near as I can determine, looks good, and has mostly correct features and details: the Special emblems are, according to photos of actual cars I've looked at, located about a scale 16 inches too far to the rear. 

 I have two previous Brooklin models, a '49 Buick and a 52 or so Dodge.  Like them, this '55 is extremely heavy and has good, heavy paint over it, but this one has much better detail with chrome wipers, hood ornament, fender vents, etc. whereas they just had cast features.  I feel I got a bit more for my money.  Brooklin, as some other diecast makers, paints over tiny molded/cast details on their cars (at least this one and the others I own) such as emblems, thin chrome strips, etc.  That might be acceptable on a $20 model but it is annoying given the extreme price they charge.  Here (zoom view in photos) I used an Xacto #11 and carefully scraped off the paint from the Buick Century emblems, filler door chrome surround, front Buick letters, and rear chrome key insert. This reveals the bare metal underneath which, even after it weathers a bit, still will look bright enough to make the model look a lot better.  I'm thinking of doing the same to the windshield and rear window surround, etc., which should be chrome, but I'd disassemble the car to do that first and will save that for another day . . . 

 

The second photo also shows a $7.00 New Ray '55 Buick Century convertible, a car that was, in the real world, exactly the same dimensions.  Although often listed as 1:43, it's actually right at 1:48.  As I said, I prefer 1:43, and this New Ray, and its similar size Olds and Pontiac cousins, sit on a low shelf, not on my layout. 

1955 Buick Special

1955 Buick Special [Brooklin) and Century [New Ray)

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 1955 Buick Special
  • 1955 Buick Special (Brooklin) and Century (New Ray)
Last edited by Lee Willis
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Brooklin cars are nicely made, but for layout cars I just don't see the price. I picked one up on the Bay for a fraction of new price, just to see what all the fuss was about. It is a '55 or so Chrysler 2-door, an Imperial or a 300. I compared it to a similar model that I had bought for $15-20, and while the Brooklin car was definitely better, I had a hard time seeing six times better. That said, if you want a decent variety of 40's and 50's cars, Brooklin can provide them. I keep an eye out on eBay; every once in a while one will go for under 40 bucks and I'll pay that for something I really like. $40 is still a lot for a layout car, but nothing like the $125 or so that they sell for new. 

 

To each his own - if the pleasure of having a really nice 1/43 '55 Buick is worth the money, de gustibus non disputandum est

The Buick is a 54. Another 54 Buick that's available is by True Scale Miniatures.

I don't understand why a high priced vehicle is TABOO for a layout. Sometimes you have to pay the price to get what you want. What I don't like to see is El Cheapo misfit generic oversized, undersized cars on a well built layout.

Don't be lazy and search ebay in 1:43 diecast. You can find plenty of deals on the high priced  discontinued Brooklins and others.

Bob

Very nice car Lee, I wish you many happy years with your new self-gift.

I would like to suggest that you display this out front where folks can see it up close and personel. Try to get really neat figures to compliment it and build an interesting story around it. As for the cheaper cars they can go a little further back.  

That said, I would call or e-mail these people who made this car and let them know that you had to doctor their work. At a hundred and twenty-five dollars you should not have to do that at all.

 

As for the 1950 cars they are a special breed. When I was nineteen I had a 1950 Desoto that had a flat head eight in it and it did ride like a dream. Of course it was seventeen years old when I had it and I had  no idea about it's potential value. One night in 1968 my girl friend and I was driving home from Atlantic city to Philadelphia and I never knew that the fan belt went until we got to the toll gate of the Walt Whitmen bridge. A little water and a rope and we where good to go until I got to Pep Boys the next day and bought a new fan belt.

I know the cars of today are technically light years ahead of my big beautiful "bomb", but she sure was fun to work on. I changed her starter, carburetor, spark plugs, water pump and master cylinder and breaks all in front of my house.

Come to think of it a Saturday night out ment a Saturday under the hood.

I'm starting to remember why I got rid of that dog, not to mention why all my friends called it "La Bomb-Ba".

 

All good memories though.

 

Oh those are nice.

 

And the memories of front yard under the hood work with a fistful of basic parts, wires, points, firing order book etc...

 

And a box of sears American measurement tools... you cannot BUY these kinds of memories anymore.. unless I purchased another old car.

 

Today's new cars require a computer to communicate with them.. ugh.

gg1man said:

 

"I would like to suggest that you display this out front where folks can see it up close and personel. Try to get really neat figures to compliment it and build an interesting story around it. As for the cheaper cars they can go a little further back . . . "

 

Great minds and all that . . .  Here it is on the layout, with W.S. figures.  This Buick is exactly like the one my uncle had in the mid '50s.  There is  me, my Dad, my cousin, and my Uncle - my cousin actually had braids!  My grandmother drank no coffee - she got her caffiene from Coca Cola - about eight bottles a day - so my uncle always went downtown and bought several cases of it at a time, wholesale. I'm holding one empty crate we're taking back.   Here we are . . . .  This particular place on the layout is one where visitors can get close up - the layout edge is 1/2 inch past the track shown in the foreground.  So, the cars here on this side of the street, where a visitor can literally get within 1/2 foot of them are all Brooklin, American Excellence, IXO, etc., and really detailed.  New Ray and other cars are kept much farther back, although that is a $7 Welly '54 Ford convertible across the street - sometimes inexpensive cars look really good, too!

1954 Buick on layout

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1954 Buick on layout
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

 

.  I'm thinking of doing the same to the windshield and rear window surround, etc., which should be chrome,

1955 Buick Special [Brooklin) and Century [New Ray)

Many "serious" 1:43 model owners do scrape Brooklin trim and lettering to get the silver look...HOWEVER, they use foil for the window trim. Since you appreciate these models, I would encourage you to join Forum 43 (Google it) and ask the members how to best go about what you want to do. To join, you must use your real name.

I have paid others to do the foil for me, but they say it is not that difficult.

I've used foil on several models and it really is not that difficult to use but (at least when I do it) it takes lots of time and care.  Given the timerequired, and the place on the layout, I'm okay with just the scraping here.  It gives a good effect quickly. 

 

I appreciate the lead on the 1:43 forum but I'm not really that much into scale cars and trucks beyond what I need for the layout.  I realize collecting and detailing them could be a fantastic hobby in and of itself.  And I admit buying cars for the layout did lead me to collect all the '50s and '60s sports cars, and all the Ferraris and Astons (my favorite car brands) I could buy regardless of decade - but I've resisted anything more so far.

I haven't had any flaking or problems so far.  Maybe I do it right, maybe I'm just lucky, but I've done it on the three Brooklin models I have and it has been satisfactory.  No more than satsifactory.  Foil would look better, yes, but the difference could not be seen on a layout, only if on display as part of a collection on a shelf, I think.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×