Skip to main content

Hello, I'm in the process of planning my first layout and need lots of help.  I'd like to use Fastrack with a minimum curve of O-42 on the outer mainline.  As of now I'd like for it to remain one level just to help things remain simple.  As I stated I'm new at this and learning as I go.  I would like to include a few sidings to store rolling stock and also be able to run at least two seperate trains at a time.  I plan on putting down "pink board" then painting it to help with noise.

I've attached a diagram of the benchwork size that works well with the area that I have.  I've attempted to use the XTrackCAD program with no success. 

I marvel at you guys and your track diagrams.  Would anyone be willing to help me out and get me started in the right direction?  I'm not looking at anything to complex, just something that will allow me to have fun with my trains and upgrade as time goes by.

Thanks for your help in advance.

 

 

Attachments

Last edited by 2101 & 614
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

While I do not have a layout program, I can offer some comments since I use Fastrack.

 

Currently, Fastrack curves are offfered in 36", 48" and 60"plus some larger sizes -- there is no 42" curve.  Since Fastrack has a built in roadbed, a circle of 48 actually needs 54" of space. That means the 4 feet available on the right side and lower left side of your layout plan will not accomodate your desired mainline size.

If you can squeese a bit more space, on the ends, the track plan guys can show you how to do a double reversing loop in.

 

I think your idea to use Fastrack is good because it has great electrical connectivity which will give you excellent operation

 

Tony

Up on "The D & H Bridge Line"

 

 

Thanks Tony.  See you already have shown I'm very new to all of this...LOL  Ok, lets go with the O-48 (54") Fastrack.  It's important to me to be able to run some of the bigger locomotives that have an O-42 minimum.

The 20' measurement is set in stone.  I can widen the others up a bit to work with the 54" space needed.

I also like real trax although there are pros & cons to any of the track systems. Magnetraction does NOT work on real trax-the rails are nickle silver. You can go to the MTH homepage, go to bottom of page and click on real trax icon. And yes, it is difficult to take apart which also is a good thing. The track pieces click togethe a specific way, but after a few times its easy. MTH has "Railware"- free rrt software in their starter sets. Also 031 curves to go within the 042 loop. Happy researching!!

 

Pete

Hey Tweet. ALCO is right about the space for fastrack, but unless you can walk around the entire layout, 54" reach is not a good idea, unless you want to spend a lot of time crwling around on your layout. Truth is, you'll have the same problem with 48" too. Perhaps if you would also show a diagram of the room/usable space we could add a few more comments. JA

George,

Here's some ideas for a layout.  Either one allows for the direction to reverse.  The first one is based on your original footprint request.  The second one shaves a foot off the end and top to allow walking access to all the switches.  It's only 12" which is tight but it beats crawling over the layout to get to derailments, IMO.

George1

 

George2

Attachments

Images (2)
  • George1
  • George2
Files (2)

one comment I had to make about choosing a track system, if you plan to buy legacy and not dcs or dcs and not legacy might affect your track choice.  Simple reason - fastrack has command control switches, if you choose to go legacy and no dcs you can save yourself a lot of wiring mess with command switches.  Downside to those switches, they cost a lot of money (they are great though, I just purchased my first one and love it).  But just thought you might want to consider before you make a track choice.

 

However, if you plan to go with manual switches, none of this matters, but some of your manaul switches could be a far reach.  All personal preference.  Enjoy your railroading.

Realtrax and Scaletrax both have remote control switches. Both offer switch machines that can move to the off side of the track. The Realtrax switches are anti-derail in operation as long as you have enough voltage on them. They do have connections for Aux Power (14VAC) for switching so I use that. They have O-31, O-42, O-54, and O72 left and right, and O-72 Wye's.

The Scaletrax switches use a passive system for anti-derail, the switch does not throw but the design allows the rail to be pushed open by the wheels and the train goes on thru with the switch springing to original position after the last wheel. Scaletrax has one limitation, they do not offer a lot of different styles of switch.

They offer O-31, O-54, O-72, #4, and #6 in Left and Right side exit.

I need O-72 Wye's and they don't make them yet, I have been told by an MTH rep. they are on the list for the future.

 

Snowlover; As far as RealTrax being hard to put together and take apart, you missed the trick.  Simply Lift the off end to separate the track pieces. To assemble; Place one piece flat, hold the second piece at a 45 degree angle with the rails touching.

Press the rails together as you rotate the new piece down flat. They will snap together and stay together. After numerous re-connections, they will loosen, if they start coming apart, you can buy clips for the back side that lock the pieces together.

 

I really like the rail shape on both of these tracks. The Scaletrax is also much smaller  rails than all other O guage track. It makes the trains look bigger.

Scaletrax Flex tracks are also the easiest to shape that I've found. I do not advise a newcomer to try flex as his first shot. It requires a lot more work to lay properly.

Last edited by Russell

Ok guys, sorry for the false start earlier.  The wife and I went downstairs together and measured out a section of real estate for my layout.

 

We agreed on a 8x16 area, no more L-shape.  I've decided to use Fastrack after talking to several people.  I'd like to run as large as possible curves on the outer mainline.  I'd like to run two mainlines if possible with a small yard toward the center.  What do you guys think?  I really do appreciate your help, everyone!!

Since I've been playing around with this throughout the evening I'm going to put them all up here.  Some of these are simply variations on a theme. Six of the layouts assume a walk around space of 16" to make it easy to get to any derailments.  They also have the widest curve of 72".  Some reverse and some don't.

 

The dog-bone has a maximum 60" curve with minimum 48" curves on the inside.  It also allows the direction to reverse.  This one is the least friendly to deal with derailments (assuming you have walls on the left side, right side, and top) but I doubt if you'll have any on the far corners.  Getting to the upper left switches will be a little bit of a stretch but since these are 72" Fastrack switches you probably won't have trouble with them.

George7

George6

George5

George5.1

George4

George3

Attachments

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×