Skip to main content

So I'm paging through the David Doyle Standard Catalog of Lionel Trains 1945-1969, a book I have just about worn through some pages over the years, and there it is on page 363 ... the Postwar Layout I want to build!

 

Turns out its the layout featured on the back cover of the 1957 Catalog.

 

While the Doyle picture provides a description of the operating accessories, the picture is rather small and I can't really figure out the track plan.

 

So here I am on the OGR Forum ... surely someone else must have asked about the 1957 Catalog Layout over the years!

 

I do my search and find a track plan.  Great!  Except for one confusing thing:  The info captured in the Doyle book (which is a copy of page 51 of the 1957 Consumer Catalog) indicates the layout is 2 sheets of 4X8 plywood.  This would obviously produce a 12X8 layout which would be perfect for the spare bedroom I plan to build this thing.  However, the track plan I found on the forum indicates 2 5X9 sections, which would be too big for my room.

 

Furthermore, I would assume the 2 4x8 sheets would use regular O-31 tubular track, while the 2 5X9 sheet layout calls for Super O.

 

Can anyone possibly shed some light on this for me? 

 

I'd really like to build the layout in O-31 on 2 4X8 sheets. 

 

Maybe there's an alternate track plan out there somewhere?

 

Lastly, the Doyle ad copy says to see the back of the 1957 Catalog cover for a full color picture.

 

Could someone possibly scan that very back cover from the 1957 catalog and post it here on the forum?

 

Thanks in advance for any and all comments / advice!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Dec 2008 issue of CTT has an article on making a classic version of this layout.  I know that there are a couple issues with the plan such as the trestle pier in the middle of the track and accessories that don't fit well or at all. I believe the article addresses these issues and improves on it.

 

Peter

Last edited by pdx1955

Hi Postwar Trainman,

Here's my offering on converting to Lionel O using 031 curves on two 4 x 8 sheets. I think you'll lose the space for buildings\accessories, but the track plan is very close.

The small pieces of straight are 301x-S or 2" and there are two cut straights to custom length. Switches are 4062 & 4063.

 

Two sets of grade trestles and one set of elevated trestles are used. The grayed track is a bridge effect for 3D purposes only to show the supports.

 

If you would like the SCARM file, email me.

Attachments

Images (3)
  • Lionel 1957 Track Plan 4 x 8 031
  • Lionel 1957
  • Lionel 1957.2
Last edited by Moonman

Thanks for all the info

 

Looks like the Layout is actually 2 5X9's and made with Super O.

 

My spare bedroom is 9X13, so maybe I could get away with 1 5X9 and 1 5X8, shortening the length of the track plan accordingly.

 

I'm still looking to use O-31.  I have boxes and boxes of the stuff!  I guess I'll just have to start laying some track on the floor to see what I end up with prior to making any decision or building my benchwork.

 

Anyway, if anyone has anything else to offer please keep the ideas and input coming

 

Thanks again!

Super-O is a beast unto itself. The straight lengths and curves don't match anything else. You're just following a track plan when you convert to another track.

 

Going to 5' wide will definitely help and allow for the buildings and accessories. The length is not as critical.

 

It's a nice plan, but it doesn't have a reverse loop built in to it. Counter-clockwise running only.

If you use O-31 I wonder if you could possibly build this on two 4X8 tables, which would measure 12 feet on the longest side (top). There looks to be two lines that don't add much operation-wise. What might be deemed as "Track 2" -- running between the small loop and the graduated piers on the bottom, and the curve running nearest the 445 Switch Tower on the side -- could be eliminated and the line that loops under the bigger yard on the bottom could tie directly into the small loop (if necessary).

Originally Posted by Joe Stachler:

If you use O-31 I wonder if you could possibly build this on two 4X8 tables, which would measure 12 feet on the longest side (top). There looks to be two lines that don't add much operation-wise. What might be deemed as "Track 2" -- running between the small loop and the graduated piers on the bottom, and the curve running nearest the 445 Switch Tower on the side -- could be eliminated and the line that loops under the bigger yard on the bottom could tie directly into the small loop (if necessary).

Joe,

Click on the track plan attached above.

Yes, this was a great layout.  It would need two 5x9 tables, not 4x8.  The layout in CTT was owned by Steve Garofalo, who also built an amazing Lionel Showroom layout.

I believe a few guys on the forum know him.  I think if you are considering building the layout, that article is a must. The track plan that ReadingFan posted is the other missing piece.  Personally, I would add another pair of switches in the lower left corner to allow for three independent loops. 

Dave

HI Guys,  My post was delayed in getting posted.  Steve G's layout used O-gauge track for this layout,  I realized that the layout that ReadingFan posted was the super-o version. The O-gauge version was published in the "Lionel Accessory Catalog"  from 1958.  I will try and post that later.  It says that for O-gauge track the layout requires two 5 by 9 tables, for 0-27, it would be two 4 by 8 tables.  Perhaps you could modify the layout a bit to fit into your space.

Originally Posted by Spence:

NSBill; Is that Gunrunner John?

 

Originally Posted by Putnam Division:

I believe Mike Spanier runs the SuperO group.......you know, I have never thought about it this way, but I guess it could be built with Atlas O track simulating Super O.

 

 

Peter

Yes, it is Mike Spanier. Peter I never did it, but back when they made their solid steel line of track I always thought it would be so cool to make some of the display layouts. I say the steel track only because of the compatability with magnetraction. There was a website I saw where there was plans showing Atlas O recreations of display layouts. I want to say it is Thor something, not sure.

 

Bill

Here is the layout from the 1958 Lionel Accessory Catalog.  I also included the layout on page 22 which shows how the layout could be adjusted in the lower left corner to allow for three train operation.  however, to make that happen, you would need to adjust where the switches would be located.  

Lionel 1957 Layout 1

Lionel 1957 Layout 2

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Lionel 1957 Layout 1
  • Lionel 1957 Layout 2

Amazing looking layout plan and great artwork to boot.

 

Am I right in Super O is O 36 for curves with 9 inch straights? Making the track geometry different from other forms. It should fit on a table made of two 4x8 sheets adjusted accordingly since 36 inches is narrower than 48, a few custom bridge piers and vola it works.

 

scratch that, it would take o 31 to make it work, probably or a mix of both.

Last edited by Allin

I believe Mike Spanier runs the SuperO group.......you know, I have never thought about it this way, but I guess it could be built with Atlas O track simulating Super O.





Peter

I believe 036 Fastrack can be used to approximate the Super O track plan.  I've built Super O dealer display layouts, one of which was a D265. Jim Barrett was able to duplicate the track plan using Fastrack.

@Victor Bertolina posted: The notes say Super0 layout is available, obviously a little different for the different curve radius.

The Super O track plan flows a bit more gracefully in the curves with th larger radius. I would love to do it in Super O but I have enough tubular track to get it done. I could possibly smooth out some of the outer loop with some 036 and a bit of saw work to make some transition pieces.

1957Layout

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1957Layout
Last edited by Toolbox

The track plan says two 4' x 8' tables in O27 and two 5' x 9' foot tables in O (31). I wonder if the original poster, Rob, ever built this?

It's funny. Now we have these huge basement sized layouts, but when we saw this as kids on the back of the Lionel catalogue, it was huge- a fantasy layout- as well as unattainable. The hobby was geared towards kids back then. Now it's geared toward adults.

Last edited by Will
@Will posted:

The track plan says two 4' x 8' tables in O27 and two 5' x 9' foot tables in O (31). I wonder if the original poster, Rob, ever built this?

It's funny. Now we have these huge basement sized layouts, but when we saw this as kids on the back of the Lionel catalogue, it was huge- a fantasy layout- as well as unattainable. The hobby was geared towards kids back then. Now it's geared toward adults.

That's wrong. Two 5'x9' tables for Super O (036) and two 4'x8' tables for 031.

I built that layout in 1958 after seeing it on the catalogue cover, using a pair of 5x9 [ = pingpong ] table kits, and thinking it was a 'dream layout', though I did make a few changes when building it:

-  I did add the pair of turnouts in the lower LH corner to permit unconflicting two train operation

-  A stand alone control panel table

-  Omission of the 'trolley line'

-  Omitted the mountain / lake area and moved the lower main a bit into that corner

-  I didn't have all of the operating accessories, and there was a coal ramp/loader at the ends of two sidings

However, I soon felt the layout had a lot of shortcomings operationally:

A.-  Having the transfer table right in the middle of the two longest sidings made it more of a Rubik's cube than a layout;  I soon added a turnout from the lead to the stub track.  I planned to remove the tt and relocate it to a new engine terminal in the middle of the small loop, but that never happened.

B.  That inside loop was a waste of space -- except that it was the only passing siding / runaround track on the layout, and all curves where you'd want to couple / uncouple.

C.  The controls were in the 'front' -- the lower portion as shown on the track layouts as presented.  But with all the turnouts strung along the rear, that would have made a better front from which to view / operate the layout.

But it was my first 'big' layout, and I learned a lot.  It lasted about two years;  its replacement was a three level out and back, single track with passing sidings layout where the trains actually "went somewhere" offstage.   The catalogue layout looked great, but wasn't very practical or fun in day-to-day experience -- sorta like some women I have known.........

SZ   --     who readily admits that old adage about different layouts for different folks

Edited to add:   I forgot about one major change I made after the layout had been up for about a year:   I kept the 'up' and 'down'  trackage between the two levels, but relocated one pair of the double crossover turnouts to the upper level and extended the upper level trackage around the left side [ as shown on the plans ] of the layout, giving me a loop entirely on the upper level, plus two long connecting tracks on which a train could be parked, and all without any additional turnouts -- hey, a pair of 022's in those days was a LOT of money for a kid or his parent(s).......

Last edited by Steinzeit
@NYC Fan posted:

That's wrong. Two 5'x9' tables for Super O (036) and two 4'x8' tables for 031.

Skip, there are two layout plans people posted. The last one says two 5 x 9s for Super O, as you said. However, the earlier one says two 5 x 9s for O and two 4 x 8s for O27. So I don't know if you could fit this on 4 x 8s in O.

Fellow forum member Mike Espy started to build the 1957 Super O catalog layout and posted some great photos in this thread: link:https://ogrforum.com/topic/1958-catalog-layout-underway

You can read in the thread that Mike was frustrated with some troublesome accessories and it sounds as if he abandoned what promised to be a fantastic project. I posted several replies and asked Mike to keep us updated but he has not replied to the thread for over a year.

the work Mike completed was top notch. Seethe photos in the above link.

Mack

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×