Skip to main content

It's been awhile since I've pondered designs for my future basement layout, so I figured I'd take a break from tax preparation this weekend to play around a little.  I've managed to sort through most of my junk in the basement in preparation for "redecorating."  The wife, not so much.... 

The biggest issue I saw with the previous design was that it didn't leave very much space in the basement side room for my wife's furniture, which would make the layout a tough sell.  This was true even if I designed the perimeter benchwork as functional shelves (for her things, of course ), a feature I still plan on incorporating. I've managed to slim these down a bit, but it meant sacrificing a double mainline and instead settling for a couple of longer sidings.  It will also require me to build into the main basement room from the get-go. Here I will put the coal mine/loading facility.  As my layout will be set in SE Ohio in winter, this will be the main industry. I've included a couple of other small industrial sidings for other businesses yet to be determined.  Since taking the "photos" I've added a 2nd approach to the turntable for more efficient coaling, watering, & sanding  - this is in the SCARM file.  I'd like to put a 4-stall roundhouse (Korber, maybe - with 1-2 extensions, of possible), behind the turntable, and maybe a small diesel service area. I might also put an ash pit off a spur there if I can fit one in a more prototypical loctation.  I'm thinking of putting a small passenger station on the main tracks behind the yard, as well as hints of a small town back there. Also thinking of a small town-like space (thinking maybe some of River Leaf Models' seedier offerings) next to the coal facility.  As with my previous designs, I've kept it to O-72 minimum except for the industrial sidings. 

In the SCARM file I've color-coded the tracks: Blue for lower mainline, green for upper mainline, aqua for transitions between the two, yellow for yard, orange for engine service, and purple for industry.  As always, any thoughts or suggestions are appreciated.

- Neal

 

 

Layout 14 - Version 1 - 01Layout 14 - Version 1 - 02Layout 14 - Version 1 - 03Layout 14 - Version 1 - 04Layout 14 - Version 1 - 05

Attachments

Images (5)
  • Layout 14 - Version 1 - 01
  • Layout 14 - Version 1 - 02
  • Layout 14 - Version 1 - 03
  • Layout 14 - Version 1 - 04
  • Layout 14 - Version 1 - 05
Files (1)
Last edited by Fridge56Vet
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I like the plan and the rendering is very well done. I do see some reach issues though. The loops behind the TT are 85-90" from the edge, so accessing a derailed car will be a problem. Reaching over the bridge to get to a large steamer engine with tender from the back of the TT could be a problem too. The green track along the left wall in the corner is 72" from the edge and the top turnout for the Wye is over 50" as is some of the lower green track.

While I agree with Jan about access to the TT, I'm not as bothered by the elevation or the bridge from a visual perspective. Perhaps all or part of the bridge will lift out for access?

Dave:  

I plan on having the back corners behind the TT as removable access panels (mountain scenery) for better access.  Also true of the area in the corner behind the yard.  As for the bridge, I may re-do the siding w/#4 turnouts to get the tracks a bit closer together if I have the room - would narrow the bridge a bit.  Unsure if I'll do 2 of the 40" Atlas bridges (or similar) or fashion one out of plywood with the girder panels from Woodland Scenics on the sides. The bridge by the door would likely be one of the Atlas ones and would either lift out or fold up. 

Jan:

Your points are well taken, and are why I do favor my previous version of the design, found here, which resolves most of those issues.  I really want a nice long mainline, reversing loops, and to be able to better showcase the TT.  Unfortunately, I'm compromised by the fact that the wife & I will have to share this space; it also has to be a quiet refuge for her (obviously when trains aren't running ).  She has some existing furniture (measured out & rendered in some images) that will need to fit & be livable.  My concern is that the double-mainline version protrudes too much into the room & cramps things too much. 

Thanks for the input, though.  I'll keep playing with things & see what I can do.  Let me know if any other thoughts.

- Neal

I've been pondering how turn the suggestions into reality while still meeting my needs (& most of my "wants") & decided that it would be easier to modify my "Layout 13" design as opposed to further editing "Layout 14."  I've eliminated the lower mainline swing-out to turn into the alcove and just turned it in over the bridge as part of the reversing loop.  This lets me eliminate a good bit of the benchwork protruding into the lower level, creating space for the wife's big chair & loveseat.  The yard & turntable are better showcased, & I also get to keep the double mainline that I want.  The inner loop is more "local" than before, though that was the intention, with the outer/upper loop more "out of town."  I can also wait to expand the layout into the main part of the basement as I have done in the past, connecting the outer & inner loops while transitioning through another scene.  Reach is improved, especially in the alcove.  I have been considering incorporating a drop-down turntable as was recently described in the Hi-Rail section and would still likely incorporate an access hatch in the back corner as well. I've included an industrial spur off the inner loop into the alcove which I'll try to play with some.  Will likely make the edge of this into a small industry & commercial area.  I'm thinking of putting a flat or something similar against the wall on the siding by the double crossover. 

Hopefully y'all approve of the changes.  Any other thoughts or ideas are, as always, welcome.  Thanks again. 

 

Note:  It's hard to see as it's blocked in clear, but there is an interior wall along the "bottom" of Image 1.  I plan to eventually tunnel through this if not remove part of the wall.  It's clear to differentiate it from the cinderblock foundation in gray.

 

 

Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 01Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 02Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 03Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 04Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 05

Attachments

Images (5)
  • Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 01
  • Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 02
  • Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 03
  • Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 04
  • Layout 15 - Phase 1 - 05
Files (1)

I realized that in my latest version I only had a reversing loop from one direction.  Reluctantly, I had to return to my "swing out & under the bridge" design from earlier, though I've managed to make a "triangle" there for a turn-around. Hoping that I can get away with placing part of the switch onto the end of the bridge; maybe I can fudge things in real time to allow a lift-out around the end of the turnout, but too challenging for me to do in SCARM and preserve O-72 curves.  I do save a bit of space by keeping it a single track - I had the "yard lead" split off from the main line near the back wall in earlier versions instead of by the yard tracks as it is now.  

Based on the cut-outs of my wife's furniture, I should also have preserved enough space in the room to make it livable.  As always, feel free to let me know what you think.  Thanks again!

 

Layout 15 - Version 2 - 01Layout 15 - Version 2 - 02

 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Layout 15 - Version 2 - 01
  • Layout 15 - Version 2 - 02
Files (1)

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×