Originally Posted by jonnyspeed:
Originally Posted by bob2:
Allan wants some very specific items that are not currently available in O Scale. He is trying to get manufacturers to make them for him.
So far, the manufacturers have not been cooperating. Hard to believe, but true.
HO has everything he wants but the size. That is a serious dilemma. I feel badly for him, since he cannot enjoy the hobby the way most of us can.
I had this same problem with S as well as O. It's frustrating to not be able to get models you really want in the scale you prefer. I had to make a choice between a lesser liked RR in the scale I want or downsize to HO or N. To make matters worse, Lionel brings out nice models in roads I want, but they REFUSE to acknowledge 2-railers. I've said it before and I 'll say it again... There is NO technical reason in 2015 to have 3 rail track. The only reason is the 100+ yrs. of history, nostalgia, and collections. Why they don't introduce a line of 2 rail hi-rail track and switchable electronics like MTH has is beyond me. They don't have to throw out 3 rail , but why not offer an alternative for people that don't want 3R? My unscientific straw poll of younger people interested in trains tells me that the vast majority of them are looking at HO and N and not O. The #1 reason why when asked? Unrealistic "toy" track.
Jonathan,
Not to bash 3 rail or high rail either,but I totally agree. I'm happy for all groups of O ''Gauge" but as long as 2 rl is looked on as the ugly duckling here,& O gauge trains are seen with "cookie cutter," large flange wheels,&"lobster claw" oversize couplers,this scale,will be regarded as "toyish" not Prototype enough to consider for modeling.
This is a smaller market with naturally higher prices because of the size,so getting into it is challenging. But when you look at the availability of products & finally learn the mindset of manufacturers such as Atlas, that once a run of a model is sold out once it's gone it's gone for good,why would anyone come up here except for the size advantage? If products were rerun with different car numbers after a couple years,that'd be ok. But once it's gone,it's gone,gone,gone forever? Not a good situation.
If Lionel.Atlas&MTH,what I call the "Big 3," would get their heads together & adapt their products to at least make them convertible for 2 rail,& keep products rolling,meaning 1 company make a 2bay cement hopper,for instance,while another co.,makes open top hoppers or a 3bay cvd hopper,that would in my eyes,lighten the load on all 3 companies to make different models plus keep them in stock better & this scale would grow. I'm gonna get feedback here,but it's my opinion,if we have things like shelf couplers for modern era 1975 to today freight,plus operating ground throws that work off the same principle as the prototype railroads,derails,etc.,the list should go on,this gives older modelers in other scales as well as 1st timers looking at scales,incentive to come to O. O is larger permitting more Prototypical operation than the same products in smaller scales. Do you see modern factory buildings out on ebay or older '50s-'60s models& few at that?
30 years ago HO was the same way. But I watched the evolution & has it changed & is ever growing. O scale or guage,is about,in many areas,40-65 years behind,I'm sorry to say,&seems content there with no disrespect meant to those moderers in any way they do a fantastic job,my hat is off to them in respect. But there has to be more,for us younger modelers,if you call 57 as I am,"young".
I can't change manufacturer's minds no matter how hard I respectfully suggest. It has to be a large group of modelers that can "move mountains" with their combined voices,not just a few "lone wolves" crying in the darkness.
My 2 cents for what it's worth,which I guess isn't much.
Al Hummel