Skip to main content

I now realize how far over my head I am with this project. I have a EXTEREMLY Strong tendancy to get distracted by every small or large detail as I am working on one "phase" of the layout. My goal was to get track laid down and powered up to run a single engine to see some progress. So I started at the atlas bridge and getting the bridge abutment aligned for safe travel. Then I went and started to paint/weather abutment while printing some trestles for the second mainline. Then the elevated trestles and trusses etc. needed painted and weathered.

I can see that I am trying to finish a section of the layout, which delays the track work and powering things up. My gut tells me I am working towards ... Yeah, my point is, I havn't a finished plan to build to! Or even a picture in my head. To illustrate this, I was working on the decent of one of the mainlines from the atlas bridge. Well the trestles took me to 2" of the table top, so then the cookie cutter was brought up. Now I need an abutment for the track to transition from elevated girder to raised hill! Whoops, there goes my focus again, lacking a plan to work towards. Any and all advice is needed! Thanks

@AlanRail posted:

John

Nice brickwork.  At the bottom of the bricks, I add a thin concrete foundation layer, which suggests a deeper concrete foundation supporting the bricks.



Actually, I put a foundation layer beneath all of my structures.

Thanks for the great suggestion, yes a prime rule of building is a sturdy level foundation to build upon. Thanks Alan for the needed reminder.

John, I can identify with your dilemma.  The best advice I can give is to take heart, you recognize you get distracted looking towards an end goal.  As I say of myself, I put the cart before the horse."  I have run out of table when I thought the plan looked good on paper.  Sometimes, I have to tear out what I just put in.  Other times, I decide to live with the mistake and continue on.  I think a lot of us have similar experiences.

Mark & Mike,

Thanks for the supportive words of encouragement, now to get back to doing something... LOL  I'll forge ahead on the goal of completing track elevations and connecting. Next step is to identify power blocks, isolate and provide controlled power. So basically finish roadbed, trestles, lay track again, and provide power. Those are the goals! Sorry for being repetitive, I have a better chance of remembering that way.

Ok I am actually starting to wire track on the second main line trestle. It would have been great had I thought of how to wire the tracks on the trestle before I printed the trestles. Had to drill a couple of holes when they coud have been included in the design. Well lesson learned for the next layout. lol Hoping to get the block done and test run a loco or two, one MTH the other Lionel. This block includes a 30 degress Ross crossing which the one side is Mainline 2 and the other is the downtown trolley run. Not sure what needs to be taken into account for wiring power across the diamond, and should the diamond be powered. I would think the trolleys' pick ups may not span across the diamond. I saw a DPDT diagram from Ross but again not sure of the reasoning. Any help in this and all my other stumbling blocks is appreciated. Thanks John

@Aegis21 posted:

Ok I am actually starting to wire track on the second main line trestle. It would have been great had I thought of how to wire the tracks on the trestle before I printed the trestles. Had to drill a couple of holes when they coud have been included in the design. Well lesson learned for the next layout. lol Hoping to get the block done and test run a loco or two, one MTH the other Lionel. This block includes a 30 degress Ross crossing which the one side is Mainline 2 and the other is the downtown trolley run. Not sure what needs to be taken into account for wiring power across the diamond, and should the diamond be powered. I would think the trolleys' pick ups may not span across the diamond. I saw a DPDT diagram from Ross but again not sure of the reasoning. Any help in this and all my other stumbling blocks is appreciated. Thanks John

John I am sure you got this! If it was easy it wouldn't be fun! Plus it keeps the mind fresh. Who needs some mind pills to keep your mind in good shape, just start a RR! Lol 😆

@mike g. posted:

John I am sure you got this! If it was easy it wouldn't be fun! Plus it keeps the mind fresh. Who needs some mind pills to keep your mind in good shape, just start a RR! Lol 😆

Mike,

Thanks for the confidence. and starting a RR is definitely a mental challenge in different parts of the brain for sure! From artistic backdrop painting to geometry of a incline grade,  to electrical signal analysis!  Not to mention making scenery, buildings lighting, programming etc.

@Aegis21 posted:

Mike,

Thanks for the confidence. and starting a RR is definitely a mental challenge in different parts of the brain for sure! From artistic backdrop painting to geometry of a incline grade,  to electrical signal analysis!  Not to mention making scenery, buildings lighting, programming etc.

You know John if someone told me everything into building a model RR I probably would have ran! But building one for the first time and learning as you go is the best and funnest way to learn!

Well progress is slow and unsteady. . . but there is some progress to report. I have some of the elevated sections installed and powered. I took Jeff's suggestion and put drops on each GG track section, both power and return drops. Also used dcs and ran a small loco and read track signal at 8 to 10 consistently on each block. Now I am at the point of wiring up Ross switches, wanting to have auto derailing and block detection as my goals. Loco ran well without and issues with grades or grade/level interfaces. Not sure if a steam engine would be a better test of track clearances? Any thoughts? Thanks

John

John, Diesels often run better than steam due to their wheel base being much shorter. The fixed nature of the wheels on steamers mean elevation change points can cause the engine to rock. The longer the wheelbase the greater the sensitivity. My most challenging are the 4-8-4s with the larger diameter drivers such as the GS-4 . Even poor switch work causes that one to rock.  I have far less operating issues with an articulated steamer like the Big Boy (shorter truck wheelbase and smaller drivers), but look out for clearance on that one depending on curve diameter.  (This is all scale stuff)

ok a brief update on some progress. Wired three blocks of track (MTH DCS) and ran a diesel to check out signal strength, two blocks were 9's and 10's the third block was dirty and had only 3's and 4's. After a through cleaning and wiping with odorless mineral spirits, signals went to the 8's and 9's. Was able to control power to the blocks with the AIU so all is happy. Next was the task of powering and controlling my first switch. Using a DZ-1000 and auto non derail wiring, was able to successfully enable non-derail feature first, then it was onto controlling the switch with the AIU. Was able to fully control switch  with AIU however the AIU only pulses the switch, so the green and red leds only stayed lighted during the 1/2 second pulse. They only stay lighted with the anti-derail feature is in use. ????? Not sure how to get the leds to stay lighted to signal present condition (straight or turn) ????? Switching the return to the yellow and green switch wires is the issue with anti-derail wiring. If I latch the switch, then auto non derail will make the switch chatter . Anyone have a solution????? Thanks

John, I think I have a similar but different problem.  I forgot to wire for non-derail and have been too lazy to rewire.  Secondly, I have two switches that chatter and the wiring looks like my others, but must not be.  My head hurt so I quit looking at it.  I haven’t had the gumption to dig into the chattering problem either.  Maybe after 45 years of having to figure out electrical problems at work short circuited my brain.  🤪  All that to say, my wiring looks pretty, but doesn’t all work right.  
Additionally, I wired all the switches through the AIU, but found it easier to use the little push buttons that came with the DZ1000s.

Last edited by Mark Boyce

Hi Mark,

Hope you have an epiphany, and find the cause of your chatter. Sometimes when I leave something ( a problem), the answer smacks you upside your head in a day or two...

Where do you phyically locate the buttons for the DZ-1000's ??? Right by the switch it controls? on the fascia?

I am now currently re-visiting the block detection firmware and hardware. Not sure where I am headed with this, however it seems like it could be involved for sure. I might just get one detection block working then continue wiring the layout.

As far as your chatter goes, I have found that both inputs to the switch are held low so it tries to satisfy both at the same time. Cutting pliers come in handy for sure.

@Mark Boyce posted:

John, I mounted the switches on the fascia near each switch.  The problem with that is that even though I labeled each, I get confused at the place where I have switches on upper and lower levels.  I have a back burner plan to make a partial panel with track diagrams for each level.

Thanks for the info as I have some switches on a different level, keeping track of which ones are where is something to plan for.

@Dave_C posted:

One advantage to ground throws besides the cost. You always make the correct choice. I only have them in one yard that’s an easy reach. I seem to have less issues. You tend to run at a much slower pace and are more focused on the job in hand.

Hi Dave,

Great idea with the ground throws,  I will plan on incorporating some ground throws where they are accessible.As you say, you always make the right choice. Still, I don't see how to keep the dz-1000 lighted when not being commanded.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×