I noticed MTH made a change in the body to correctly resemble U.P. #8338 and #8445. #8338, built in June of 2005, has the rear sand fill on top of the carbody and a walkway light above the headlight.# 8445, built July of 2006, has two sand fillers built into the carbody on both sides and no walkway light. Also the "Building America" is different on each unit. #8338 has the two words on top of each other and #8445 has them side by side. MTH to my surprise got these production changes right.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
MTH has added details and made some specific changes that no one gives them much credit for. If they get something wrong, that sure gets published!
The very first SD70ACes weren't as detailed in the frame area. The newer ones have many frame details.
The newer GE's have some great pilot detailing. Much finer hoses on the pilots, Nice cut levers, etc.
MTH has added details and made some specific changes that no one gives them much credit for. If they get something wrong, that sure gets published!
I've been seeing this lately. Mike had mentioned "flex tooling" used in the H.O. line for road-specific detail making its way into the O scale line. Saw an example of this with the recent GP38-2 releases with the ATSF units having a warning beacon properly located, rooftop AC and offset horn placement. Pleasantly surprised to see engine-specific detailing show up as well.
I like it.
IMHO, MTH diesels look better than most of the Lionel diesels with a few exceptions. Lionel still uses the tooling for those detail less dash 9s with the horrible looking trucks and MTH wouldn't dare use tooling that bad. Even the Railkng models look better than any of the Lion Chief stuff I've seen. I think that you get the most value for your money when you buy MTH.
An HO diesel model has more detail than Lionel or MTH. It is nice to see some progress toward being prototypically correct for the money they are asking. To me details do make the difference even if it is a 3rl engine.