Skip to main content

I'd like to add an elevated return loop to my 5'x10' layout. With ~80 inches of track and an end height of 6" it works out to a 4.5% grade. What is an acceptable grade and elevation? I know that the lower, the better but I've only got so much room to work with. FWIW we only run fairly short freight trains - 5 cars at a max. 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A 4.5% grade should be do-able for short trains. Your best bet is to rig it up temporary and try it out with your own track and trains. Avoid abrupt changes in grade at the top and bottom. If you have the space, I would recommend reducing the grade somewhat on sharp curves as compared to the straight sections. Depending on your trains and transformer, you may find speed control touchy going up and down.

 

I did this small trial layout with grades about 5% (1/2" per track section) and found it tricky to control conventional postwar trains going downgrade. It's a good idea to arrange scenery to cushion a train that might overspeed and fall over.

 

2012-2131-O27 trial layout

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2012-2131-O27 trial layout

Good to know though it will be a challenge to find more room on my layout to reduce the climb. Below is a pic from SCARM showing what I'm planning (addition in red). In theory I could start the grade just past the switch in the lower left but I really want to keep some of that straight stretch level for operating accessories. Would replacing the bottom right O36 curves with O72 curves make it easier to control the train speed on the descent? The transformer and controls are in the lower right corner so catching a derailing train should be easy though I'd still like to avoid it.

 

Elevated plan

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Elevated plan

Splitting the grade is possible but would substantially complicate construction of the layout. As it sits, the lower part of the layout is all flat which makes for easier construction, more convenient operation on the main lower level, and more flat space for buildings etc.

 

If it was for me, I would maybe start the grade near the switch at lower left to reduce the grade, and try to find another place for the operating accessories. Or accept the 4.5% grade as an operating challenge on the branch. I think wider curves on the graded track at the right side would be a good idea to reduce the chance of derailment if a train runs away.

Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ:
Originally Posted by pennsy484:
Consider splitting the grade.  For example, go down say 2.25% on the lower level and up 2.25% on the upper level. 

How do you do that on a layout like this with the crossovers and switch locations where they are?

I don't think you can without moving them.  That's a whole nuther puzzle.  As usual its all about the tradeoffs.  It depends on what is more important to the original poster.  

 

Another issue with splitting the grade is that you will not have a level loop and will always be encountering a grade on the loops, albeit a smaller one.

 

Here is a RRTrack plan of my layout.  Lots of track in a small 13 by 15 space I know.  3 levels, 3 loops, all connected, 072 minimum.  First pic is all the track.  I split the grade on the right side.  The outer loop goes up from the top of the page to the bottom of the page (this loop is shown separately in the second pic) and the inner loop, or really the right reversing loop goes down from the top of the page to the bottom of the page (this loop is shown in the third pic).

 

I wanted to split it evenly, something like 3.25 inches up and 3.25 inches down, I don't recall exactly, but my carpentering skills are not good and the inner goes down something like 2.5 inches, so the upper had to go up something like 4 inches.

 

So I have no flat complete loops, and the grades make for heavy trains.  But the room is smallish and the modern engines I run handle the grades with 22 car trains if needed (though doing that all the time is probably not great on the motors I'm guessing, so I usually rung around 10 to 15).

 

5604273921_39e2617856_o

 

5604852130_5cbb11dd15_o

 

5604267697_3046177c37_o

 

Attachments

Images (3)
  • 5604267697_3046177c37_o
  • 5604273921_39e2617856_o
  • 5604852130_5cbb11dd15_o
Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×