Really simple request

Here you go.  This is output from Scarm.  Atlas O-72 3rail.  Russ

THANKS.  pretty much perfect!

There is some variance from Scarm to reality. It gets you very close because fatory specs are used, but cutting for the track on hand is safest

Adriatic posted:

There is some variance from Scarm to reality. It gets you very close because fatory specs are used, but cutting for the track on hand is safest

Whaaaat? On what planet ? C'mon A - were you that bored?

How many posts have you seen were folks expected perfect accuracy? 

  Besides that; Yes, I'm "always" that bored. I was always very active before my injury. Then sometimes not feeling well enough to leave bed and run a train..for near a decade...cabin fever and all, months without vistors or speaking. Maybe only down one or two days a week now that I'm feeling somewhat better physically this year. (three bad diaphram/abdominal rips, stomach hangs by my esophagus at back of throat, etc). I cant even sit, or stand for too long. Maybe a few hours tops before I need to lay down. Thats why it took 7 years to build the 4.5x9 myself, mostly abandonded the shelf layout, and mostly am sticking to small goals done as cheap as possible.... trains and trying to help folks are what's left of my life's lemonaid now. ....But it could be worse too. At least SCARM got me very close to my expectations  

Adriatic, just having some fun, teasin' ya.

I have found that most of the layout software builds as designed. Some have discrepancies in the track libraries, which shouldn't be, but I don't use those.

SCARM and RR-Track will build as designed. 

Cool. And I figured as much, but still second guessed myself too. Cutting without items on hand always makes me nervous, planned or not.