Skip to main content

For those of you unfamiliar with the term:  

The basic idea behind these trucks was to put the motor and most of the weight of the car onto the larger set of wheels, thus getting maximum tractive effort, while having a second set of wheels on the truck for a smoother ride.  The idea worked fairly well, and maximum traction trucks like this were in scheduled service well into the 1950s.  

Working O and HO scale trucks do exist at the fine scale level.  My question is:  Given "steamroller" trucks such as seen in the MTH Brills and PCCs, Bachmann Peter Witts, Industrial Rail Brills et cetera,  how well would a similarly constructed Maximum Traction truck operate?  

Mitch 

Original Post

The weight distribution in a 3-rail truck would no doubt be different than the prototype. Or rather, a 3-rail manufacturer would have little incentive to replicate that weight distribution on their interpretation.

On the full-size ones, "maxi-traxie's" were ok as long as you ran girder rail and single-point turnouts. On T-rail, especially with spring switches (like on, say, then Shore Line Trolley Museum) it was found that the pony wheels had a distressing habit of climbing the railheads at inopportune times At least that was the experience with BERA's Brooklyn 1792:

(photo: hiveminer.com)

I understand that since then, some truck work managed to loosen up the sideframes enough that this car now safely traverses the mainline, including its spring switches, though I don't know if the car is cleared to operate in anything other than closely-supervised operations.

---PCJ (ripping thru NJ at 120mph)

Last edited by RailRide

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×