Skip to main content

I’ve seen layouts with bench work that have the plywood overhanging past the legs along or those with the legs at each corner.  Provided everything is nailed/screwed down correctly, what is considered an acceptable overhang to prevent bowing?

 

Specific to my question is having 48-inch wide plywood atop my 36-inch wide Mod-U-Rail Modules, with a 6-inch overhang on each side.  The short two ends of the layout would be flush with the module stand.

 

Personally, I would feel more comfortable having the top be supported at each corner, plus it gives the ability of attaching a 2x1 hanging down from the plywood in order to attach back drops, acrylic barriers, etc. In my case, I would use my 18-inch wide Mod-U-Rail module stands (separated 12 inches apart on the short side) on the corners of the layout.

 

My nervousness stems from resting an arm (either mine or a visitor) on the corner and tipping the layout even slightly.  In my 4x8 Halloween  layout last year, it ended up having to be screwed atop a 30x72 folding table.  Needless to say with huge 9”x 12” overhangs the corner led to a lot of bowing meaning the corners were barren areas and the layout was completely contained within the Figure 8 loop of track of O36 Atlas track.  Even then when the train came around the corners, you could still see the plywood bend with the weight of the train.  Had to spend more time telling visitors not to rest their hands on the corners instead of them enjoying it.  That will not happen again this year, as I will most likely use a 36x80 HCD and make the layout smaller which will probably be more entertaining.

 

 

Last edited by Amfleet25124
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Kevin,

From what the Mod-U-Rail assemblies look like on-line it looks to me like they are ideally suited for a top with no overhang. Since the assembly is wood though you might want to buy some 1x8 pieces of pine and add these as cross pieces along the sides of the module between the legs. Then get some of those stamped metal shelf brackets and to support the overhang and anchor it to the 1x8 cross pieces. Final assembly should be very rigid and the 1x8 cross pieces give you plenty to drill into for anything you want to add.

S

Kevin,

 

Overhung extensions cause vertical forces and moments(same vertical forces times the distance on the overhang from the layout supporting framework). The deflection of the unsupported sheetboard is influenced bt the point of load (force) application on the overhang, force magnitude, thickness of the sheetboard and distance(spans) between the vertical supports of the sheetboard. These vertical supports must be framed into the layout supporting framework and carry the vertical forces and resultant by connection into this framework. If you apply a wood shape, 1"x 2" or 1"x 3", with the 2" or 3" edge vertical and attach shape to the outside edge of the unsupported sheet and also to the vertical span support members the deflection should be elimated.

 

I use the L-girder construction method in building my layout framework with overhung areas you can do a web search on L-girder construction for model railroads and overhang.

This should give you assistance in resolving your question.

 

If you mean unsupported plywood with no edge bracing, you should have very little overhang.

 

However, the ability to set legs back under the layout is one of the key features and advantages of an L-girder design or even of a strong grid system.

 

Naturally, for a small layout, stability must be taken into account, but larger layouts usually have plenty of mass to prevent tipping when someone leans on an edge.

 

 

bench 001

 

bench 002

 

Jim

Attachments

Images (2)
  • bench  001
  • bench  002

Kevin,

I'm not sure about the overhang, I know in the smaller scales you don't have that problem because there really isn't that much weight involved unless you have a huge plaster mountain hanging out there.  Both Jim and Dale seem to have given you some great advice.  The L-girder system has been around for a long time and works very well.  I agree with Jim, you can move the legs back out of the way from the edge.

 

Jim, your layout looks tremendous, nice web site.  

Originally Posted by PWTrains:
Originally Posted by EMD:

Would a 2 inch overhang (3/4" plywood set on Mianne benchwork) be o.k.?

 

This would be a small 3 x 5 layout.

 

Thanks for any replies.

EMD,

 

Here is a photo of my layout with Mianne Benchwork.   The 3/4" plywood overhangs about 3".   Very stable.

 

Paul

IMG_0010

 

 

Looks very good, gives one hope for any future 3" extensions.

 

 

Originally Posted by rockstars1989:

My framed 3/4" plywood top hangs over 20" from the support structure.There is no need for the ply to overhang the framing.Check out the pics.PS: Kevin,we would love to see a few pics of your progress.Nick

Wow, Nick.  Wow

Last edited by Amfleet25124
A 2" or 3" overhang with 3/4" plywood on a 3x5' layout!
Yeah, I think you are ok there.  I guess the real question is why build it like that?  What is the plan for a fascia to finish off the front?  I'm thinking a two piece crown mould wasn't part of the plan. 
Just stick the plywood out there... ?  I don't know.  How are you planning to finish off the edge?

Hi William,

 

This is just a small layout/project.

 

I am using some existing Mianne benchwork which is approx. 32" x 62"

 

I was initially planning to do a switching layout, but decided on an a small oval.

 

To do O31 curves (and have some distance to the layout edge), I will use a sheet of plywood that is 36" wide x 66" long, therefore there will be a little overhang.

 

As far as the fascia, I will probably cover the layout with a piece of carpet & let the overhang edges be wrapped by it.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×