Dave B has my favorite out. Oil crayons. I'm not even the good with them but they are so much fun.
Drafting 4, Architecture 2. My school "leaders"
pulled me out of industrial drawing and stuck me in graphics so a jock could get a fake grade, and a free ride.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be98f/be98f7ba568c29f70fe91572080c4164369a90a5" alt=""
Sports and higher education became the systems focus, not general education.
It cost me a local ride in my chosen field
. (Which CAD would have killed for me
At least in graphics a camera and keylines could still be worked in for a while
)
I still hold my razors with my mouth to free my hands
It freaks people outdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b0dd/5b0dd515a9cdebe917136b5b2b356a30d9c82469" alt=""
Graphics in high school led to Commercial art, computer graphics, big camera, press and bindery. Big Heidelbergs to little AB Dick 369T's pumping out fliers at full speed
.
IBM/Varitype/Lantastic, & early Apple typesetters (fastest in steel block & old Varitype machines too
). Silk screening
I should have been a surgeon
When my favorite teacher (boy was he oinery
but that free ride bit cost him my respect
) challenged me to draw an inch without a ruler, I did 4"
.
That got me graded by blue prints
with him holding them against the lighted window for the year. (it reveals line inconsistency)(still got the A
)
I just don't care for the "perfection" as much anymore. Just the art.
Small drafting/light table, my high school T-square, portable 15"x15" Oak pad/table with its own little T-square. 2 modern cartridge calligraphy sets, one with replaceable tips, one antique set/fixed tips, a full drafting ink set including bow compasses.
Sooooo......I use both, paper and keyboard.
I'll sketch as I think. Later, I'll apply it to the program.
The programs are closer guesses
than most sketched on paper plans. The part lists are "instant".
To me, newer software with 3d views are an obvious advantage over programs without. Each angle of view is done NOW!
Its not perfect, but very usable visually. That's what I was waiting for in a program I guess.
I would have paid for it, but it seemed no software mfg. was willing to step up.
(Now they have had to! Thanks Mixy
)
I was already using MS-Paint over the top of Anyrail when it came up short.
When I started with Scarm I found it hard at first, and almost gave up.
But I thought hard about it and knew the 3d would be worth the learning curve.
I was also used to how easy Anyrail is to use.
Nothing beats hands, on with real track. Until you get into a complexed design data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dffc5/dffc5dab2a87a9a919110f9f2faa3d7d497aa01c" alt=""
I will likely skip the more serious sketching now, leaving it for the "front porch dreaming" only. The "light box"(computer) is just to easy to ignore.
Saves pennies on paper for the circular file too.
You guys realize you can print out the plans as a template, and lay the paper on the board right?
Being able to use printed patterns was a semi-big deal once upon a time.
Their accuracy wasn't always great either.
Which program didn't work out, and how far off was it?
I bet it was set up so that Lionel tubular was measured at the center rail by mistake
.
Most other track gauges are measured that way, from center to center=diameter.