Skip to main content

I am not a rivet counter per se; however, I have to admit the Athearn 1:50 scale Model A Fords look tiny compared to my allegedly O-scale (and therefore alledgely 1:48 scale) MTH and Lionel engines and figures. And they certainly look tiny compared to the usual diecast vehicles that I have, which are allegedly 1:43 scale and 1:50 scale.

It's very challenging to find 1930's and late 1920's era vehicles...which IMO are in the classic car period, and am interested in what other's think of Athearn's 1:50 scale models. Perhaps they'd look right in an O-scale On30 or narrow gauge layout?

Finding "scale" models in this hobby generally appears challenging, and is really up to the individual to measure and compute, which I don't care to do. I have to admit that the now defunct European line of MTH scale models looked very nice and appealing. Allegedly, they were made to 1:45 scale, which seems a nice compromise between 1:43 and 1:50.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The real reason that the 1:50 stuff looks so small is were' very used to the oversized 1:43 vehicles that are by far the most common.  Truthfully, if I could get all my vehicles in 1:50, I'd prefer that to 1:43, but they're simply not available in any variety.  My scale trains, which comprise the vast majority of my fleet, are true 1:48 scale, I'd rather have the cars be 1:48 or 1:50 than the significantly larger 1:43.

Yeah, it'd be nice to have everything match up, but given that O-gauge track is twice as high as it would be, with fat rails at that, and train wheels are oversized, larger accessories and vehicles "look good" despite being 1:43 or whatever. Therein lies the issue - scale vehicles next to O-gauge tracks can be dwarfed by the trains, so we're forced to compromise, which is not a big deal to me... I enjoy all the stuff mixed together, but the Athearn vehicles just don't look right? I can definitely see why some guys go the extra mile with true O-scale track and wheels, etc. The other issue is with figures...a 1:43 scale figure would appear a giant next to a 1:50 scale vehicle. I guess this all goes back to O-gauge vs. O-scale, where O-gauge was traditional Lionel and whatnot, and the figures were likely 1:50 or thereabouts. Oh well, very challenging to find vehicles of the 1930s era.

Last edited by Paul Kallus
@Paul Kallus posted:

...but given that O-gauge track is twice as high as it would be, with fat rails at that, and train wheels are oversized, larger accessories and vehicles "look good" despite being 1:43 or whatever. ...

I partially agree with this, especially when the vehicle is right next to the track.  Ross/Gargraves and Atlas help a bit but the ties are still oversize. 

However, to me 1:43 vehicles still make my engines look small.  While 1:48 is not the primary scale for other hobbies such as doll houses and military scenes, 1:48 is still widely used for them (especially plastic kits).  It would seem like there would be a better market for 1:48 vehicles.

Maybe if we got away from our fascination with die-cast metal and went with detailed, lower cost plastic, 1:48 vehicles might find a following.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×