Skip to main content

While my new layout will be less than half the length of my previous one, I was able to design an island type shape that will offer 360 degree viewing, something I always wanted to try. This is more work but I love the look so far. I designed this layout to be accessible from all sides and am working on a drop-down river, which will allow me to access the interior for construction and cleaning. If successful, I'll be able to reach every part of the layout without having to climb on top or use pop-ups. I will have to duck under the bridges to access the interior via the drop-down river unless I design lift-up or hinged bridges (doubtful on this). The layout is 190" long by 110" wide.

 

I am planning on incorporating scenery that will allow the viewer to walk around the perimeter, and never able to see more than a portion at any one spot, thus creating a walk-around journey, albeit a short one at that. The column on one side was built into the layout and will likely become a tall building. I was able to run a separate receptacle on a 20 amp circuit breaker down the inside of the column, thus eliminating the need for wire runs from the perimeter wall to the islands. The temptation was to build a rectangular layout up against the longest wall in the basement (which is 24 ft long), that is how I built my last layout in a former home. Access issues were a pain in that layout and details were lost from view in the background. However, from principles of curved geometry this layout will have 42 ft. of "frontage", considerably longer than what a rectangular layout would allow, and I am going to try to keep scenes within 40" from the perimeter and/or river. 40" is my max reach and is about the max distance I desire for viewing.

 

Overview with bridges shown where mainlines will traverse:

HPIM0918

 

Serpentine river section folded up and secured with deadbolts:

HPIM0919

 

River section folded down:

HPIM0920

 

The track plan at this stage is a double-tracked perimeter run with 106" and 102" outer curves, respectively. Crossovers via Ross switches. I'll probably have an inside industrial spur on the one island. I am not sure if I want an elevated line...did that on my last layout and it was a LOT of work and am not sure it was worth the pain. I might just do a Superstreets elevation for the city part. I want to avoid a jammed-packed layout with 3-rail track running everywhere. If anyone has any suggestions on a more interesting track plan let me know your thoughts.

 

Next, I have to paint the river bed prior to putting down plexiglass. I've been studying lakes and rivers and the colors are more complex than I realized. I could use help on this but don't know any local artists. I'll be off to the craft store this week to see what they offer.

Attachments

Images (3)
  • HPIM0918
  • HPIM0919
  • HPIM0920
Last edited by Paul Kallus
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

OOH, a serpentine river section.  That got my attention immediately.  Then how big it is-  very cool.  It sounds like you have a pretty good idea what your plan is.  Your past experience will pay off this time around.  I have a feeling your layout is going to be a gem.  It's hard to comment on your track plan, when I can't see it.  I'm thinking there is more to it than your description.  That's a real river you got there.  How many scale feet wide is it?  That is a major scenic element of your layout.  That should be fun to figure out.  Gonna need a bigger boat, Hooper.  There's more than bluegills swimmin' down there.

Last edited by William 1

Hi William,  I am putting together a rough track plan on graph paper, but at this point it's pretty simple: two tracks circling the perimeter with crossovers and an industrial siding that may have a track parallel part of the river bank serving industries. The key is that you'll never be able to see the train on the other sides of the layout because of rising interior scenery. The river is a scale 112 ft wide from bank to bank. I am not sure if I should make it a constructed bank like you see in some cities with man-made wharfs or walls or if I should taper it down gradually. Since the river bed drops down for access I should probably do the former. Hopefully there'll be no "sharkin" in these waters, only some tug and fishing boats chuggin around.

Originally Posted by Paul Kallus:
The key is that you'll never be able to see the train on the other sides of the layout because of rising interior scenery.

This really interests me.  I got "corrupted" by my time in HO and now it is difficult for me to fully enjoy my trains when I can see the same train on both sides of the layout at once.  I'd really like to see how you implement the view blocking/scenery.  Please post a lot of pictures!  I'm also always interested in seeing track plans.

Paul your river looks great. Can you share some more pictures of how you rigged the river to hinge down? I may have to steal your idea, I never thought of doing that for viewing purposes. Do you have any ideas on how to hide the seams where you cut the glass?

 

Rich used the same method, looks amazing.

Hi everyone,

 

Current plans are to fix the bridges in place, thus forcing the dreaded duck-under (with the river bed folded down of course). Lift out bridges are great, just will require more work and time.

 

I only painted the plywood underneath the plexiglass, and then placed the plexiglass directly on top. I used various shades of blue, green, and charcoal on the wood.

 

The river is hinged on one side (4 heavy duty hinges) and held in place on the other side with 4 deadbolts. As for hiding the seams, I took the cheap method and used one piece of plexiglass, thus I had to mate irregular sections together, but that only is under the bridges, not in the more open part of the river. Had I the funds I would have purchased another piece of plexiglass to properly mate the sections together. Either way, there would be seams however.

Looks really nice so far. Here's an idea to think about. On the front bridge you could attach V-blocks to the bridge that sit in pockets so the bridge is perfectly aligned when set in. On one side use a pressure switch to connect power to the bridge when set in place and to cut power to the blocks ahead of it when raised. This will give you block protection when the bridge is out. Wire the pressure switch to the coil of a DPDT relay for the power routing.

Paul,

 

Your work is exceptional, and that river looks great. You called it aquatex plexiglas, and if I had known it existed, I would have used it instead of the Aquatex shower glass I used for my lake, which also is a hatch, but is much heavier than plexiglas.

 

Another of our forum friends is contemplating making a river similar to yours, and has considered aquatex glass but is discouraged by its weight and cost. I Googled aquatex plexiglas and drew a blank.

 

As Brian, above, also wondered, could you provide more information on the source for aquatex plexiglas?

 

Thanks!

 

Alex

 

Paul...

 

FANTASTIC looking scene!  I am the forum member to whom Alex (above) is referring.  Right after the first of the year, I started to make plans to do something very similar to what you are doing and just recently installed a series of "concrete" breakwater sections along both sides of my "canal" scene.  I have two highway bridges crossing at two different levels rather than railroad bridges.  The canal is 30" wide and 9 feet long (no bend in it like yours since it is a canal instead of a river).  I will have a over flow of water on one end that falls about a foot down to my harbor scene in front of the city.  Anyway, the "canal" is part of the isle in order to get from one part of the layout to the other so Alex and I have been discussing how to hinge it for the last couple of months or so.  Part of the concern is the weight of the Aquatex so I have been looking for an alternative.  Sure would appreciate the source of those 4 by 8 foot sheets and the cost.  In our part of the country, no one has them in stock....  Please let us know any details that you can share!!  AND...again...WOW!!!!!  Beautiful work Paul...

 

Thanks,

Alan

Thank you for the comments. I've been traveling for work and haven't had the chance to check in as often as I would like. I hope things will settle down.

 

Brian, Alex, and Alan, the Aquatex plexiglass I purchased from Eagle Glass Shop in Eagle, PA - phone #610-458-0733. They're on Font Road near Rt. 100. It was a special order but only took a few days to get in. It's expensive stuff with tax the 4x8 sheet came to $284. Had I factored in all the weight better, I would have used 1/2" plywood for the river bed instead of 3/4". I can manage the weight, however. I used four heavy duty hinges and 4 deadbolts to secure.

 

Tom, for the fascia I used 1x6 and dadoed grooves in the backside to facilitate bending the curves.

 

Forest, thanks for the tip. I'd like to get my hands on a diagram if possible.

 

Pops, the column presents a challenge, and as the picture shows, I incorporated it into the layout to faciliate just what you suggested. Another forum member suggested making a building front out of cardstock, but my modeling skills leave something to be desired.

 

Brian and Dave, I got see your layouts someday soon, since we're all relatively close by. I'd also like to see others layouts if you're not too far away. I am still many months away from running trains myself.

Last edited by Paul Kallus

Thanks Paul....Alex just e-mailed me to let me know you had posted the info on the plexiglass Aquatex.  Yep...the darned stuff is expensive.  Even more so locally!  I have been trying to come up with an alternative since in my case I need a full sheet and more.  I am going to use a light frame covered with Masonite rather than plywood....this in order to save on weight.  I found some heavy roll plastic that has reflective wavy water-like characteristics so I am going to paint the Masonite top the appropriate colors and then take a try at covering it with the roll plastic to see if I get acceptable results.  If so, I will post my results on the forum.  I suspect it will not look as good and may not be as "wavey" as Aquatex but I want to see if I can get decent results at a much lower cost.  I may end up getting what I paid for!!  The heavy roll plastic was around ten dollars.....

 

Thanks,

Alan

Progress is slow, however I finally got the track laid on my new layout. All Ross trackage/switches with super-elevated curves on the double-track mainline. The track plan is simple: two concentric loops (O-104 and O-96) with an industrial line and siding off of the inner-loop; and an interior sub-way line that will be mostly covered up by elevations. I am debating whether I should make the curved fascia into a viaduct; this would give the effect of a foreground rather than the train just racing around the outer edge. Or, if I should extend the fascia by means of curved foam and put trees, signals, and details on it, thus extending the outer edge of the layout by another 2-4 inches; however this would defeat the purpose of curving it (which is to allow easy access to all areas of the layout). There's always compromises in layout building. If anyone has any ideas please let me know. Meanwhile, I have to build shelving for the transformers/control systems and then the dreaded wiring begins.

HPIM1179

HPIM1180

HPIM1181

HPIM1182

Attachments

Images (4)
  • HPIM1179
  • HPIM1180
  • HPIM1181
  • HPIM1182

 

Congratulations Paul, Ross is a great trouble-free trackage/turnout choice that you will enjoy. Your ingenious Waterway["drop-down river"] seriously belongs in the O-gauge Hall of Fame--its already in mine.

Looking ahead---after wiring you will very quickly recover from the resulting case of "trainback" and "train-neck" and can leap into the fun of railside rust-painting and track ballasting..

Thanks, everyone.

 

I found pieces of foam archways that I should be able to glue onto the curved fascia, which will hopefully give the impression of a wide curved viaduct on the wide-sweeping outside mainline.

 

For the super elevation I simply cut pieces of cardstock and placed them under the outside half of the cork roadbed; being careful to transition from tangent to curves as gently as possible. The total rise on the curves is only about 3/32" - less than 1/8". The results are worth the extra work, especially when ballasted. Trains leaning into curves is really neat.

 

Dewey, I'll try my hand at weathering the outside rails, after ballasting; one of those "down the road" projects.

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×