I don't know how much this adds to the discussion, but here goes:
As a photographer, i've gotten a fair understanding of copyright law, and it really amazes me the casual disregard many(most) people have for the property of others. That is what copyright is all about. No one is stoping anyone from creating their own work, but simply copying another's for gain or personal use is questionable at best. I've gotten to the point of refusing sales when I know the work will be copied. In the eyes of the law, and a good clean conscious, there is no difference in walking into the movies with a camcorder, scanning and printing a copy of a photograph, or making a mold off someone else's casting.
Then again, in society today we frown on those owning intellectual property, and expect to be given free access to everything.
"The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave." - A.R.