Skip to main content

One of the things that is nice to do with an upgrade is to have a dual-level smoke feature so that at idle there is less smoke.  I've done a few of them wiring the components by hand, but it's pretty time consuming.  With the advent of a cheap place to get circuit boards in small quantities, I decided to streamline the option with a PCB.  This is used with the Super-Chuffer, connected to the cab light output.  When the cab light comes on, I not only light the cab light, I also pick the relay.  This switches in a pair of bridge rectifiers wires as diode pairs to drop the voltage on the smoke unit by about 3 volts.  The other two bridge rectifiers are there to always drop the voltage to the smoke unit.  I used the larger thru-hole bridges to have a little better power dissipation than the surface mount versions.  This circuit is designed to run from the R2LC TMCC smoke output and power a single 16 ohm resistor.  Since I use the MTH smoke unit in many conversions, it's convenient to simply leave the stock resistors and isolate one to make it easier to install the smoke unit.

Smoke Intensity Controller [Super-Chuffer Interface) Pic

Smoke Intensity Controller [Super-Chuffer Interface) Schematic

I also have a diesel version that I have to build up next, that one has the motion sensing circuit that I use in my locomotive motion sensor and the relay to switch the smoke intensity.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Smoke Intensity Controller (Super-Chuffer Interface) Pic
  • Smoke Intensity Controller (Super-Chuffer Interface) Schematic
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Jayhawk500 posted:

John, I'd be really interested in this. Especially if it were in kit form. Being a former aviation electronics tech in the Coast Guard this would be a easy fit for me. I'd be willing to give it a shot.

I'll consider that, I'd have to get some more blank boards.

J Daddy posted:

I am confused, why not integrate this into your smoke generator board and sell as option A or B?

Simple, the quantity that would be sold, the tooling costs to make the changes, etc.  Changing the Super-Chuffer design costs for all new tooling, and making it larger would preclude it fitting into many locations.  The current size is a challenger in smaller locomotives already, adding these extra parts would push it over the top.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×