Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I gave it a try in RR-Track software.

It just doesn't look like it will fit.

 

I believe the problem is on the crossover the 22.5 degrees is the angle between the two straights, and the 22.5 degrees of the turnout are that the curve on the O72 turnout is 22.5 degrees of a circle. 

 

This makes the curve of the turnout end at 22.5 degrees from the horizontal, but the crossover is 11.25 degrees from the horizontal. 

 

If the O72 turnout were 11.25 degrees of a circle it would work.

 

But an O72 turnout is probably too sharp to clear the straight in 11.25 degrees. Now if they made an O90-something in 11.25 degrees turnout it might work

I did have some luck on RR-Track using a 45 degree crossover. It gives me 22.5 degrees from the horizontal.

 

It requires a 5" straight and a 1.75" straight to join the turnouts on each side. I could get the cross and turnout to auto join nearest track, so while it looks like it "might" work, it might have some small gaps. Also, it looks like the parallel tracks would need to be 9" to 10" apart.

Of course the other way of resolving this would be two consecutive single crossovers, left and right. 

 

Using O-72 FT switches and a single fitter straight piece (comes with O-72 switch package) between the curved legs, the overall length of the single crossover is 28.82" with a center-to-center distance of 6" between tracks.  The overall minimum length to create a double crossover in this manner would be 57.64" (57-5/8"). 

 

That eats up a lot of track length, but it avoids the cost of a crossover piece, allows the use of O-72 switches, and keeps the parallel tracks at a reasonable spacing.

 

Just an option, FWIW...

 

KD 

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×