Skip to main content

Well, I've made some progress on the layout in the last few weeks. I have the yard and the two outside main lines up and running - can't tell you how much I enjoy running a train without crawling around on the floor!!!

 

As I am not one for running trains under the Christmas tree (trains around usually large live trees make me nervous due to the proximity of water and falling needles to electricity), so I have added some of the Department 56 houses I have to the layout for the season.

 

 

image

 

image

 

Of course, there is always one Holiday Heifer who doesn't believe that there are real cow catchers!!!

 

image

 

And now, in keeping with my tradition, I have a question which, I am sure, someone here can help me with. The inner-most mainline must gradually elevate and pass over the track entering the yard. I plan to use 213 Lift Bridge to cross the yard entrance track (as you can see in the pic below, it is currently doing it's best impression of the legendary "Bridge to Nowhere" - when in place, will be renamed "The Gil Hodges Marine Parkway Bridge). My question is how do I go about elevating the track to get up about 5 - 6 inches to meet the bridge ends. I purchased a set of FasTrack graduated trestles, but a good part of the graduated elevation will be on O-72 curves, and the set only has straight metal supports (and the curved tracks are significantly longer that the 10" straights). Also, as Fastrack is rigid, how do you start the graduated section? I have included an old track plan so that you can get an idea of stretch of track that will be elevated.

 

image

 

image

 

Thanks.

 

Attachments

Images (5)
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Wow, this is going to be a Really Nice Railroad. Thanks for sharing your hard work with us OGR Forum Train Enthusiast.  Just a word of caution, if you install the 213 Lift bridge, you will limit your train consist do to the low clearance of the bridge ends. This is not to be a negative comment, just a caution for your Thoughts. I had that bridge and decided not to use it do to intermodal cars, crane cars, etc...I totally agree this beats running trains on the floor....Keep us posted on your progress....Happly Thanksgiving....

Macaroni;
 
Thanks for the info. I have about 11 feet on either side of the yard entrance, so that shouldn't present any problems. As for the 6 in. height, as it is just a single track at the point of the crossover, it will only present a hight issue when I need to bring something in or out of the yard, so the lift bridge will generally be in the down position allowing trains to pass over the entrance. I am already thinking that I will be using the yard primarily for engine storage since it doesn't hold many of the scale cars on any of the tracks. Looks like I'll have to find some room to build another, longer yard.
 
I don't believe I just said that!!!
 
Originally Posted by Macaroni:

It takes about 10 ft to elevate 6 inches.  But 6 inches is not enough for modern high cube box cars or double slackers.   I ran into this problem on my layout.

 

Larry;
 
Thanks for the kind words, warning, and suggestions. Having seen some of the layouts that folks here have built, if mine comes out half as nice, I'll be very happy. 
 
The bridge is an interesting story... I bought it when it came out back around 2002 and it sat, unopened, in a closet until a few days ago. I just placed it in an open area on the layout while I try and figure out how to elevate the track to meet up with it. I pulled out one of my JLC GG-1's to run and noticed in the manual that the pantographs require 6 in. clearance which made me measure the opening on the bridge to find out they shall not pass!!! This presented a bit of a conundrum - lose the bridge or lose the GG-1's and Acela. In the end, I've decided that the bridge just looks way too cool to not use it, so I'll just have to keep the high stuff off the inside track.
 
I did consider elevating the entire inside track, but I ended up rejecting that idea. My original concept was to have three main lines which would be independent, but interconnected. That way, I could take a train from the yard and move between all three tracks, or run three separate trains. I still really like that idea, so I need the crossover which is opposite to the bridge. Luckily, I don't have too much rolling stock which would crash the bridge.
 
Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
 
 
Originally Posted by leapinlarry:

After viewing this for a second time, I really like your idea. Possibly the second level could be completely elevated, 7 inches above the lower track height....This way, any size car could be used on the bottom level....Although they would be separate loops, they would be completely operational. I like the homasote for sound deadening. 

 

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×