I need input for my new layout

Looks like a nice layout.

Overall it's a good scheme for the space. It could use some tweaking to eliminate or reduce S-curves and improve clearances between tracks in places. I gather that you want to use GarGraves sectional track as much as possible, and maintain an O54 minimum radius.

Indeed, I have all the gargraves track I could need. I also plan on using Ross switches which I should have all I need. I know the sidings leave something to be desired. My last layout was a christmas seasonal, basically just two loops. I really want sidings to be able to display some more cars and have room to move things around. I will add uncouplers where useful once the plan is finalized.

The clearances are my biggest problem because I  know the mohawk and ES44 I plan to run both overhang decently on 0-54.

Hey all thoughts on my updated design? It has much wider clearances and a few more features for operational value. The odd free floating square is a basement support pillar that I made just to make sure the design would clear. I attached the SCARM file should any want to modify it showing their suggestions!

Thanks all!

The inner loop2loop doesn't work for reversing loops. Once a train is going clockwise, there's no way to reverse without backing through a loop. The track between the 2 switches has to connect the switches in order for reversing to take place on both ends. I've attached a revision, but it requires more cuts. I think this design might be better suited to Atlas which has small fitters, half-curves, etc., but if you're willing to cut track to fit, go for it.

Also, from what I've read, double-slip switches are nice to look at, but not worth the money and can be troublesome. Problem is, I couldn't find a switch combination to replace it given the desire for dual mains on the angle you have them and the curves you're using.

Here's an idea. The tracks more uniformly parallel and concentric for a multi-track mainline appearance. Curved turnouts and S-curves are eliminated. Minimum radius is still O54. The inner circuit can be run without putting down the entryway bridge. Trains can reverse from either direction. The original baseboard outline is unchanged so it can be compared to the previous footprint.

Daz, I hadn't realized the way I setup the right side loop wouldn't allow for reversing. Thanks for catching that! Ace I truly wish I could have a layout with that many storage terminals, however this is a shared layout with my father, he has a fair sized collection of Dept. 56 buildings which have to be incorporated. The two open areas give him the room he needs to setup up a small city and on the right side a mountain village. I will continue to modify things to move to numbered switches as opposed to curves to see how it will work out.

I thank you both for these suggestions, it has given me a lot to think about. I suspect I will post another plan tomorrow evening after work, I look forward to your input on the next step in my layout design!