Skip to main content


Innovative approach to building a modular benchwork system

 

Here is an innovative approach to benchwork design using 2x4 lumber fastened together with hex head bolts.  My concept layout is composed of various size modules that bolt together in various configurations. The layout height is set at 48 inches which places the track at near eye level. The modules are designed to be easily connected and reconfigurable since all pieces are color coded to make assembly foolproof.

 

My standard module sizes are 3 x 3 foot, 3 x 6 foot, 2 x 4 foot and 1.5 x 6 foot. Other rail lengths will also be built.  All the modules bolt together to provide a very sturdy structure. 

 

This system is NOT designed to be used with "show" modules since it is intended to be used only in a semi-permanent location. The use of modules allows changes and additions to be made to the layout design as necessary.

 

 

Note: The 2x4 rails could also be replaced and used to extend the module lengths to 8 feet or longer.

 

 

My modules are designed for use with O-72 and O-54 curves and turnouts.

 

 

3 by 3 construction 001

3 by 3 construction 002

3 by 3 construction 003

3 by 3 construction 004

3 by 3 construction 005

Attachments

Last edited by pro hobby
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The modules are designed to be interconnected in various configurations. The attached photos show how these modules bolt together using 1/4 inch hex bolts. When bolted together the entire assembly is very sturdy and stable. Note that the underside of the layout is very accessible for wiring since the table height is 48 inches.

 

A color code system is used to mark each piece so that assembly of all interconnected sections is foolproof.

 

 

BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 001

BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 002

BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 003

FRAME JOINERS 001

FRAME JOINERS 002

FRAME JOINERS 003

FRAME JOINERS 004

FRAME JOINERS 005

top rails mth cars 009

top rails mth cars 010

top rails mth cars 011

top rails mth cars 012

top rails mth cars 013

top rails mth cars 014

top rails mth cars 015

top rails mth cars 016

Attachments

Images (16)
  • BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 001
  • BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 002
  • BULKHEAD INSTALLATION 003
  • FRAME JOINERS 001
  • FRAME JOINERS 002
  • FRAME JOINERS 003
  • FRAME JOINERS 004
  • FRAME JOINERS 005
  • top rails mth cars 009
  • top rails mth cars 010
  • top rails mth cars 011
  • top rails mth cars 012
  • top rails mth cars 013
  • top rails mth cars 014
  • top rails mth cars 015
  • top rails mth cars 016
Originally Posted by RICKC:

Why are you using 1x4s bolted to the 2x4 legs?  Why not just bolt the top 2x4 to the 2x4 leg?  Seems like extra work to me.  I'm not trying to be negative just seems like an extra step that's all.

 

Rick

 

 

The construction method places the 2x4 top rail so that the 2x4 leg directly supports the rail (not the bolts themselves).  The bolts serve to secure in place the top 2x4 rail only. The bolts do not support any load. Otherwise the bolts would have a shear force applied to the bolt cross-section. Nails, screws and bolts do not have a very great shear strength.

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Why such heavy lumber? I'd suggest 1x4 lumber, we build our modular club modules with that and they're rock solid.

 

I also think you sell 1/4" bolts short, I'm sure they're more than up to the task of supporting anything you're going to put on the table.

 


I have been able to hand select 2x4 lumber which is very straight and is less likely to warp over time when compared to 1x4s.

 

Excellent progress Allan.
I maybe confusing modular with transportable (mobile) benchwork. I will look forward to learning the amount of time it will take to setup and teardown the layout at a remote location. I realize one x factor for time is the size of the layout based on the number of modules required.

I see a lot of nuts and bolts to connect the modules together which can become labor intensive. I get it for durability. I see the need to carry additional tools (a cordless drill and at least two box wrenchs). Second box wrench as backup if the drill battery fails...

I don't understand the need to color key the ends of the boards.  If it's modular, it shouldn't matter which side or end is connected between two modules? Or, is the color used to help construction?

I used a combination of alpha/numeric sequences to indicate where parts should line up together on my current 6x8 layout. A1, A2, B1... It worked for me.

You are fortunate you have both the time, budget and lumber yard nearby to source straight lumber. I would welcome seeing variations in your design to accomodate varying degrees of "straight" lumber.

I look for used but not abused scrap lumber to keep a budget. My referenced layout uses in some places, 2x4's that were cut to those actual dimensions. They were donated to me when a 30's era bungalo style home was remodeled. I have no plans nor need to crawl on it.

I admire your design and efforts. I think its great. I look forward to seeing your progress and thanks for sharing!

Best,
CH

The one suggestion I will make is to countersink the bolts on the eventual front face of the layout. This way you could put a sheathing on to cover and/or add shelves for trains.

 

A 2 by 4 costs about the same as a 1 by 4 in #2 pine. Fine for a home layout with the added weight. 

 

It does not take to many modules to overload a trailer even with 1 by 4 construction for a show layout.

Originally Posted by Dr. Jack:

Even with a big van or truck to move this, the size and weight seems like overkill for a modular base. But to each his own.

 

Jack

This modular benchwork design is not compatible with modular layouts set up at shows since it is designed for an elevation of 48 inches. The benchwork is modular but NOT intended to be taken down and reassembled at shows, etc.  It is a semi-permanent layout that can be reconfigured by adding more modules as necessary.

Originally Posted by AMCDave:

Nice neat clean work! A bit over engineered I think. The laminated legs are over kill IMHO. Your duel bolts should hold the layout fine.....or just add a short support block if you feel the need.

The double legs transfer the weight to the floor. Most likely used the bolts instead of deck screws to disassemble easier. Nothing wrong with a belt and suspenders.

 

Another thing that would add to lateral strength is the addition of shelving materials on the bottom stringers. The centipede effect of adding modules adds strength laterally as well as the table top materials.

Last edited by F&G RY
Originally Posted by pro hobby:
Originally Posted by RICKC:

Why are you using 1x4s bolted to the 2x4 legs?  Why not just bolt the top 2x4 to the 2x4 leg?  Seems like extra work to me.  I'm not trying to be negative just seems like an extra step that's all.

 

Rick

 

 

The construction method places the 2x4 top rail so that the 2x4 leg directly supports the rail (not the bolts themselves).  The bolts serve to secure in place the top 2x4 rail only. The bolts do not support any load. Otherwise the bolts would have a shear force applied to the bolt cross-section. Nails, screws and bolts do not have a very great shear strength.

In this design, the 1x4's purely serve as a gusset plate allowing the 2x4's to be connected together quickly. Therefore, this piece really only needs to be about 7" for finished lumber. It doesn't need to go to the floor which would save a number of bolts and time. A 2x4 leg will hold a lot of weight especailly in this system where the legs will be relatively close together.

Peter

Originally Posted by CH:
I don't understand the need to color key the ends of the boards. 

My guess ....I think in this standardized sectional layout the color keys allow for mass production of standardized components (cut, drill and key) that can be set aside and assembled later. The advantage of this kind of system, if the layout is ever moved into a new location, replacement sections can be easily fabricated connecting existing sections. 

 

Peter

Originally Posted by Moonman:

This looks like a good system for a home layout that you want the "I have to be able to climb on it" strength.

 

I concur with GRJ that it appears to heavy for a traveling layout.

 

Nice idea for the module locking using the legs.

The layout construction method is NOT intended to be a traveling layout.  It is designed to be semi-permanent but still allows for expansion by bolting on additional units.

Techniques for attaching the "subroadbed"

 

I prefer to attach the "sub roadbed" with wood screws which are accessible from the underside.  This ensures that no fasteners are concealed in case I need to change/modify the track.

 

I will use 1x4 boards fastened with wood screws to form an "L" bracket. The subroadbed will then attach from underneath using these "L" brackets. I will use 1/4 inch composite board cut with a saber saw to the contours necessary for the subroadbed.  I use MTH RealTrax so that I do not need to ballast the track once attached.

 

 

 

 

 
Last edited by pro hobby
Originally Posted by Dr. Jack:

Even with a big van or truck to move this, the size and weight seems like overkill for a modular base. But to each his own.

 

Jack

This modular benchwork design is not compatible with modular layouts set up at shows since it is designed for an elevation of 48 inches. The benchwork is modular but NOT intended to be taken down and reassembled at shows, etc.  It is a semi-permanent home layout that can be reconfigured by adding more modules as necessary.

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×