About these battery tests reported, first he classified different chemistry AA batteries as the same and compared standard carbon batteries, Harbor Freight and Heavy Duty Dollar Generals, with alkaline batteries.
He also did not consider the use of the batteries and corrosion potential. For high drain usages like standard bulb flashlights there are at least two different drains to consider. For a flashlight in a car or on my battery holder in the shop, that are seldom used, a lower capacity battery, like a carbon one will set around for a year or two. For a heavy used flashlights, the alkaline battery would be the better choice. BUT if you have one of those expensive aluminum cased Magnalite flashlights and leave any alkaline battery in it for a year or two it is probably ruined from corrosion as alkali will eat up the aluminum case. A carbon battery is a better choice. Carbon batteries also will corrode items, but my experience is any alkaline battery will corrode much more often than carbon batteries due to the alkali eventually eating up the steel shell of the battery itself. I would consider using rechargeable Panasonic eneloop NiMH batteries, like I use in cameras, BUT they have only 1.2 volt output when new and fully charged. Also, after about 8 years or so they lose the ability to be recharged as I have recently found out.
Another AA battery use is remote controllers for my Cox cable TV cable boxes service. These eat up batteries, carbon ones especially fast. I have settled on DG alkaline batteries, lower cost in packs of 30, and they last a couple of months. They fail when giving a 1.5 or less voltage reading and we have 4 remotes. I uses the DG alkaline batteries, discarded by being <1.5 volts for remotes, for my several small portable am/fm radios that are happy with batteries at above, at least 1.0 volt. I have never had those carbon batteries corrode my radio, but I have to change out the <1.5 v DG alkaline every several months to prevent corrosion of the radios.
Charlie