Things are generally NOT built with quality in mind today. It's a disposable mentality ...
... I understand that inferior quality is a fact of life, but neither I nor Susan have to like it.
John,
Agreed. No argument. You have many good points. But, this statement above has nothing to do with fixing something that has broken, only how soon it breaks in the first place. Yes, it shouldn't break, ever. But even mechanical things break. If they didn't then why did Lionel put in place a large service network, even from it's earliest days?
You may think that is temporary, but I don't. When will the MTH TIU be available again? Never. How many people covet those that own them? What about the Cab2? Now we need to wait and wait for the WIU at high cost or the Cab3 (same deal).
The Cab-2 is a special case. The biggest problem with it is that the "touchscreen" used to make changeable buttons is not used on anything else, as far as I can tell. As a result it was already obsolete when the first Cab-2 was made. Everything else in the world that uses a touchscreen uses the cellphone-type glass surface, specifically already used in billions of phones. Because of this the technology is not only still available but will also likely be for a long, long time. Not so for Cab-2's touchscreen.
99% of all other parts used in any of our stuff, and any other electronics, are standard parts. They're widely used in millions of other things manufactured in many other industries. The headache we see in our hobby is magnified many, many times in these industries because of their large production volumes. As a result substitutes are already coming. Yes, they're slow in coming because in the semiconductor business it takes years to build new plants.
You cannot say this for the old, admittedly superbly made, mechanical parts we use in our hobby. They are only usable on model trains, and as such only made and used in very low volumes compared to mechanical parts used other industries. What differs is the size of the new tooling effort required to fill the void. Electronics - a little bigger; Mechanical -- a little smaller.
I can rebuild a KW or ZW using run of the mill parts or refurbish the worn parts because they are built to take it and not self-destruct in the process. Even the bakelite shells can be restored.
Any old-fashioned transformer, say a ZW for example, from the time it's first used to get a train to move, is wearing out because of the mechanical contact between roller(s) and windings. Is this not self-destruction?
Yes you can replace rollers, and line cords, and other parts. And, you can replace electronic parts similarly with new ones. My term "Standard" is the same as your term "Run-of-the-Mill". The only difference is the skill set one needs in order to swap out the parts. I realize that electronics may not be easy for you to fix, but they are still fixable by others.
As far as cheaply, it won't be cheap in either case. Hours of time spent in a repair are expensive, whether we're talking mechanical, electricals, or electronics. How much did it cost the last time you had a repair person fix something that broke, say a refrigerator or wash machine?
Just saw a ZW-L on sale for $1000. Wonder if can be rebuilt in a few years for a few bucks?
It certainly can. It's made up of individual, replaceable parts.
My thanks to you and Susan for your comments.
Mike
(BTW - Countering other points in this thread, if you want electronically controlled variable AC, and most of us do although might not, smooth-wave AC will cost you much more than that $1,000.00. Is it worth the extra money?)