Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
I don't care what the gender of the author is, a good article is a good article.
Rusty
That's how I see it, Rusty, whether I'm on the editor end of things or the reader end. I would certainly like to see more articles written for OGR by females, but the hard truth of the matter is that the males of the species still dominate in this hobby, and for reasons that are really not too hard to understand.
In my long years in the hobby, I've know a good number of women who are involved, and some who are truly exceptional modelers and rail enthusiasts. They may not write for the magazines or participate on forums, but the same can be said for a whole lot of superb male hobbyists.
Many years ago I did a study of Lionel catalog covers to demonstrate how they often reflected changes in our society (usually on a delayed basis). It was interesting to examine how and when the first girls appeared (and how they did or did not interact with the trains), when the first women appeared (and how they were depicted), when the first black child appeared, and so forth. Interesting stuff!
But to get back to the topic: MR is no more sexist than any other publication targeted to an audience comprised primarily of one gender or the other. We all could do better, I suppose, but it is what it is and I'll be darned if I'm ever going to go out of my way to be politically correct it trying to cater to the wishes of one group of another or to achieve some kind of artificial balance. Just ain't my style.