Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Thanks, Guys.

 

Scrapiron,

 

The lighting affect in my basement is a bit different than I've seen for other railroads. I have low ceilings so I had a challenge with the lighting.

 

I sprayed all of the joists and everything above white. Then I hung florescent light fixtures inbetween all of the joists, allot of them on several circuits. Then I put in a drop ceiling, hung somewhat close to the bottom of the joists but with enough room to deal with the panels. The whole ceiling is clear prism tiles to diffuse the light. The bulbs are a combination of Natural light 5000 and Soft light 3000. The whole ceiling pretty much glows like high noon.

 

I haven't used any special postitioned lighting when I've taken photos of the railroad. I like to keep the photo true to what the lighting really is in my basement but I am having some trouble with white balance with the ballast. The camera I use is a little Canon Powershot SD800 from about 8 years ago. I'm thinking about getting a better camera for taking layout shots but right now I'm not sure what I'm after.

 

 

Lehigh,

That is a really neat comparison. I had not seen it before.

Chris,

Obviously you understand light temperature and the importance of diffusing.

That you have nailed. I suggest you approach the ballast issue from a weathering perspective as opposed to a white balance perspective. I would not change the light temperature nor the diffusion because you have that down very nicely. You could try reflectors to bounce the light around or perhaps some manual form of dimming like an umbrella in certaIn spots. I would darken the ballast selectively to look less uniform. That will fool the eye to convince the observer the light on the ballast is correct. As long as the light on the subject and backgrounds is correct, the eye gets fooled.

 

Kudos.

Scrapiron,

 

I understand what you are saying about weathering the ballast and it is very valid point. I had weathered the ballast on another section of the railroad and the ballast looks good in the photos, but in person it is just a little overweathered for my taste. Some of the ballast on the real railroad gets to a range of incredibly dirty so even if I got to that point it would still be realistic.

 

The ballast in the section in the photo above actually is lightly weathered and the subtlety looks good in person, but it isn't showing in the photo. I think you are right when you say I should not mess with the white balance. I think I can hit this section just a little bit more and still be satisfied with it.

 

Thanks for your input.

Last edited by christopher N&W

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×