Skip to main content

Well, this little guy came to me about a week ago, in fairly rough, played with, rusted shape. There's hundreds of these clockwork locomotives out there and I wasn't too worried about wrecking the original "patina" on the body. Add to the fact that at one point in its life the inside had some kind of heavyweight oil gunked onto it and the clockwork guts, I set about a little refresh, since no parts were broken.  I believe a few are missing, however this doesn't worry me. It looks like it was a sparker but the flint assembly is gone. Fine by me, knowing my luck, I'd set the carpet on fire!

photo 1[4)

Here it is, torn down and you can plainly see the gunk on the clockwork movement.

 

 

photo 2[5)

So I stuck the Clockwork motor into an Ultrasonic Cleaner while I bead-blasted the body off.

 

 

photo 3[2)

(Sorry it's sideways) This is after a few shots of grey primer! The clockworks cooked along in the UT cleaner for about 2 hours while I was doing this.

 

photo 4[1)

And this is what it looks like after a quick rinse with Petro-sol and a blow off with compressed air.

 

 

photo 5[1)

Desired Results!

 

I'm no stranger to restoration / refreshing as I've restored much more complicated antique electric fans in the past with beautiful results including a 1936 Westinghouse 10" Poweraire "Darth Vader" and a 1943 16" General Electric Vortalex.

 

OLD THINGS ARE AWESOME!!!!

Attachments

Images (5)
  • gunky old loco
  • I SHOT IT!
  • Primed!
  • Clean Clockbox
  • Compleat!!!
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Steamer:

       

beautiful work!


       


Thanks Dave! Kinda the reason I like the Lionel postwar and Marx stuff. Easy to work on and fun little projects. I don't think I'll ever buy a new Lionel locomotive. Williams by Bachmann, Marx, RMT (I want a Beep) and Postwar for the very few new (or new to me) loco purchases I'll be making. It's kinda tough when you've got all your favourites already and the two or three that you want don't work on your track or cost thousands of dollars.
Originally Posted by SteamWolf:

..., since no parts were broken.  I believe a few are missing, however this doesn't worry me. It looks like it was a sparker but the flint assembly is gone. Fine by me, knowing my luck, I'd set the carpet on fire!

...

 

photo 4[1)

...

at first it looked like the bell clapper was missing, but then i realized that from this angle you should see the top of the bell and apparently that's missing, too.  and seeing that it's typically attached to the gear shaft which is present, it doesn't seem plausible that it was removed after it left the factory.  i have see motors without sparklers, but i always thought the bell was on all Marx clockwork motors.

 

i probably should have started off with, nice job on the restoration, but just can't help but be curious about the motor.  perhaps windup guy, James will chime in later on when he gets done with the dozen or so tasks per day he seems to accomplish.

 

cheers...gary

Originally Posted by overlandflyer:

 

photo 4[1)

 Very nice job on the restoration, and I'm not just saying that because the Marx Mechanical CV is my favorite locomotive! 

 

The lack of a bell and spring is curious.  I do have a single example of a Marx sparking ratchet motor that doesn't have a bell or spring... however, it is most definitely a postwar version (as the black sideplates and drivers indicate), but interesting enough, it doesn't even have the tabs punched out that hold the bell spring, nor does it have the embossed catch on the intermediate gear to flip the bell spring.  It does have the slot in the sideplate for the spring.  It came in a box of parts, so I don't know what locomotive it was originally in.  As Gary indicated, your motor has the tabs to hold the spring and the embossed catch is visible on the intermediate gear, too.  I do agree that it appears your motor came from the factory without the bell.  I have only heard of one other Marx windup motor without a bell (that appeared to be original) and that was in a Monon diesel... it had the bell, but no spring.  Not enough examples to determine any sort of pattern, but I'll keep my eye open on every Marx ratchet motor I have in my hands from here on out.  I'll also have to read all the catalog descriptions I have scanned, and see if any leave out the "ringing bell".  Marx was famous for stripping extras off the windups in order to meet a requested price point for a retailer; it's possible that one was willing to give up the bell in order to retain the siderods... but that is pure speculation on my part.

 

As a side note, I like to remove the sparkers from my motors, and I generally don't fix the bell spring if they happen to be broken.  Both of those items create a bit of drag on the motor, and I like to get maximum distance out of each wind!  But, if you do want to put the sparker in service, you can glue emery cloth around the sparker wheel - just make sure that the ends have a slight overlap in the proper direction so it doesn't catch the flint.  Sparker arms and flints can be acquired from Grossman (he is highly recommended - I've always been happy with everything I've bought from him).

 

Thanks for posting the pictures of the project, I always enjoy seeing another windup CV brought back to life.

 

 

The photos below show me in 1953 with my Dad's tinplate Marx windup set, and the set today.  I stripped, primed and repainted the loco, renewed the various pieces, etc., and had to rebuild the whole wind up mechanism which is identical to the one you showed.  I ended up buying five others on e-bay to get parts, etc.  but eventually got it to run about 125+ feet on its own with one wind up.

Slide18

Slide19

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Slide18
  • Slide19
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×