Skip to main content

I have been buying standard gauge freight cars for a little while now and noticed after I got home from a local auction that there is a difference between Lionel 500 series and 200 series cars. I want to run 400Es on the layout, but I have not been able to secure one yet and now I'm wondering which series of cars go best with a 400E? Specifically coupler height?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

 I know the "Lionel Classics" repro 400E had low couplers - our museum has one, and I had to bend the coupler on it to pull a set of 200 freight cars. I don't know about the MTH repros - I've never worked with one. 

My MTH 400E (11-1001-1) came with a low coupler on the tender.  I run a long string of 500 freight with it, and love how it looks.

I have a 200 series gondola with 500 series trucks and I do not care for it very much.

I could not find it to post a picture. sorry.

MTH made a Blue Comet and MR boxcars in 200 series with 500 series trucks to match the passenger trains as add on cars.

The world will not come to an end if you connect a 400E to 500 series cars. If you are running medium to smaller STG I would avoid the 200 series cars and stick with 500 series cars.

There is still another option, one could replace the 500-series wheels (9T-1  7/8"dia.) with the 414-series wheels (418T-1 1"dia.) which would make the car stand slightly higher. Using the 200-series wheels (319T-15 1¼" dia.) I believe would be too much.

 

Should add that the 418T-1 and 9T-1 wheels used the same axle (9T-20) whereas the 319T-15 used the 319T-4 axle.

 

Finally ALL Lionel Standard Gauge rolling stock, tenders, passenger and freight cars, used the SAME coupler - CP-21.

 

Ron M

Last edited by ron m

I stand corrected on the height of the State cars - I put one next to a 500 series freight car yesterday and the couplers lined up. I had thought the couplers on State cars were higher than on the Stephen Girard and Blue Comet cars. 

 

Does anyone know where to get the straight-shank coupler that was used on the 400E's that were shipped in sets with 200 series freight cars, and/or what the part number was? It looks like I'm going to need a set for a  Williams 381E that I'm planning to use with 200 series freight cars. I'd also like to get one for our museum's repro 400E, since that locomotive is used exclusively with 200 series cars. 

From my previous message:
 
"... ALL Lionel Standard Gauge rolling stock, tenders, passenger and freight cars, used the SAME coupler - CP-21."
 
The coupler height above the rail was dependent upon the diameter of the wheel used.
 
Ron M
 
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

I stand corrected on the height of the State cars - I put one next to a 500 series freight car yesterday and the couplers lined up. I had thought the couplers on State cars were higher than on the Stephen Girard and Blue Comet cars. 

 

Does anyone know where to get the straight-shank coupler that was used on the 400E's that were shipped in sets with 200 series freight cars, and/or what the part number was? It looks like I'm going to need a set for a  Williams 381E that I'm planning to use with 200 series freight cars. I'd also like to get one for our museum's repro 400E, since that locomotive is used exclusively with 200 series cars. 

OK, then how did Lionel match the height of couplers on the 400E to 200 series freight cars? Did they shim up the tender body?  I have seen a number of posts on this forum stating that there was a coupler with a straight shank, but I haven't seen one. I looked at the set pictures in a 1932 Lionel catalog, but none shows the coupler connection. To repeat the question, if the couplers were the same, how did Lionel get the 400E to match up with 200 series freight cars?

Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

<SNIP> To repeat the question, if the couplers were the same, how did Lionel get the 400E to match up with 200 series freight cars?

 

One word answer - SLOP!

 

Now to expand on that, there is enough vertical freedom (looseness of fit) to accommodate the 1/8" difference in coupler height. Or each coupler has to move only 1/16".

 

Ron M

Originally Posted by F&G RY:

Question. Why did Lionel make a special tender for the 390E with 200 series wheels to line up with 200 series cars.

As silly as it may sound. They wanted more unit production. Sell the special tender as an optional piece = more money in the bank for them. Another point to ponder. There are those new in the hobby (Std Gauge) who are uncomfortable using pliers and/or a screwdriver. For the few Lionel made the optional tender. 

If you can't use a pair of pliers and a screw driver maybe you shouldn't be in this hobby I prefere a larger hammer myself.
 
Originally Posted by Happy Pappy:
There are those new in the hobby (Std Gauge) who are uncomfortable using pliers and/or a screwdriver. For the few Lionel made the optional tender. 

 

 

   At the time the original 390TX (200 series trucks) was made Lionel did not have a larger steam locomotive. The only model available was the 390 in 1929 and the 384 in 1930. Neither loco was designed to be sized for the larger rolling stock. Lionel was facing fierce competition from the IVES 1134 and had been so since 1928. Rather than lose market sales, they simply raised the tender height to work better with the larger cars. Easy. Expecting customers to "modify" a loco brand new out of the box was not good business practice, especially as these were toys. No parent wants an unhappy rugrat on Christmas morning when he finds out his new locomotive wont pull his cars!

 

   Now the 9 loco was a coupler outcast. Sized for 200 series cars, the couplers were too low. It looks too big with 500 series, and only seems to fit well with the 428 cars? 

Originally Posted by Happy Pappy:
Originally Posted by F&G RY:

Question. Why did Lionel make a special tender for the 390E with 200 series wheels to line up with 200 series cars.

As silly as it may sound. They wanted more unit production. Sell the special tender as an optional piece = more money in the bank for them. Another point to ponder. There are those new in the hobby (Std Gauge) who are uncomfortable using pliers and/or a screwdriver. For the few Lionel made the optional tender. 

The 390X tender was not offered as a  separate sale item in the 1930 Consumer catalog. The 390E/390X combo was offered in Outfits Nos. 407E,423E,358E. The 358E was a work train and this was also part of the 407E. The 423E came with 211,212,213,214,215,216 and 217 cars.

 

FWIW 1930 introduced the "Blue Comet" headed by the 390E and paired with a 390T tender to pull the 420,421,422 cars.

 

Ron M

Originally Posted by The Nighthawk:

 

 

   At the time the original 390TX (200 series trucks) was made Lionel did not have a larger steam locomotive. The only model available was the 390 in 1929 and the 384 in 1930. Neither loco was designed to be sized for the larger rolling stock. Lionel was facing fierce competition from the IVES 1134 and had been so since 1928.  

Lionel had no steamer through the 1920s because there was "no demand" as Hertz noted.  But as soon as the the 1134 came out, the process reversed and in a few years the electrics started disappearing.  Curious.

Ok, got my 400E, modern MTH version (10-1061) so I thought I would do a little real world comparison.

 

This picture shows the 400E and a original Lionel 513 stock car coupled together, no problem.

400E 513

 

 

This picture shows the 400E and an original Lionel 418 passenger car coupled together, again no problem.

400E 418

 

 

This picture shows the 400E attempting to be coupled together to a MTH 212 Gon, won't work. Is this the dropped coupler that MTH used? I am holding the 400E coupler up with a piece of wire to show its highest travel.

400E 212

Attachments

Images (3)
  • 400E 513
  • 400E 418
  • 400E 212

For further edification, the following Standard Gauge tenders used the P/N 9T-17 wheels (7/8" thread dia.):384T,385T/W,390T,392W,1835W. This same wheel was used for these cars:309,310,312,332,337,338,339,341,511,512,513,514,514R,515,516,517,518,520,1766,1767,1768.

 

P/N 418T-1 wheel (1" thread dia.) was used on: 400T/W,412,413,414,416,420,421,422,424,425,426,418,419,431,490.

 

P/N 319T-15 wheel (1¼" tread dia.) was used on: 211,212,213,214,214R,215,216,217,218,219,220,319,320,322,428,429,430.

 

Remember Lionel was into business to make money and one way to accomplish that is to keep the number of different parts to a minimum

 

Ron M

 

 

 

Not including flange, just a hair over 1".
Your comment about the tender wheels being wrong could explain why the draw bar doesn't line up with the engine that well, but then again you last post Ron said that the tender should have 1" wheels on it?
All in all still a good looking piece. I am going to modify my stuff anyways so that is all couples together and looks the way I want it to.
 
Originally Posted by ron m:

Now the $64,000 question - "What is the tread diameter of the 400T tender wheels?"

 

Ron M

Here's a pic of an original 400T and 212 Gondola plus a close-up pic of the coupling. This a 1934 Lionel Work Train on display in the National Toy Train Museum in Strasburg PA.

 

Like I originally posted - SLOP - allows for the coupler-to-coupler connection between the 400T tender and 200-series cars. No special coupler required!

 

Ron M

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 400T-212 coupling
  • IMG_0226 copy
Last edited by ron m

Tim,

 

This is what was listed in Lionel's 1935 replacement parts booklet.

 

319T series trucks: 428,429,430 (1¼" wheels)

 

9T series trucks: 309,310,312,332,337,338,339,341 (7/8" wheels)

 

414T series trucks: 412,412,414,416,420,421,422,424,425,426 (1" wheels)

 

418T series trucks: 418,419,431,490 (1" wheels)

 

1766 series trucks: 1766,1767,1768 (7/8" wheels)

 

 

 

Ron M

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×