Skip to main content

Hello friends. Need a little education here. I have the Atlas Through Girder Bridge that I'm using to span a small creek. I also have a pair of Monroe Models bridge abutments. The Monroe abutments are just wide enough to hold the bridge stringers with the girders hanging just outside the width of the abutment. Although I like the fit, I'm doubting its realism. Every picture I've found shows the girders sitting on the abutment, with no shoes.

So I guess I'm not sure if structurally the stringers support the weight of the bridge and the girders provide rigidity, or if the girders support the weight of the bridge and the stringers are just there to support the track between the girders. If the latter, then clearly the girders should be on the abutment.

In the case of this Atlas model of such a bridge, the girders are lower than the stringers by about 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch. Meaning that if the girders are on the abutment, the stringers will be floating above the abutment not touching anything.

Just trying to get clarification because this piece will be near the edge of the layout (close to viewers) and I don't want to mess it up.

Thanks

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Atlas Bridge install. Not prototypical, focus was on the bridge as a lift-out piece, and the correct track height to match at both ends.  Click on the underlined phrase to link, then click on Start slideshow.

The model is made with (4) steel flat bars as part of the base.  The model bridge is self supporting, in addition to being a pretty good model of a Pratt Truss bridge. IMO, Mike CT.  Bridge with the grey abutments 40.5".

Last edited by Mike CT

As already stated, the girders carry the load to the abutments.  Rail bears on stringers, stringers transfer load to girders, girders transfer load to the abutments. 

I would submit that most sit on some sort of bearing shoe or plate.  Normally one end is a pinned (aka hinged) connection, while the other end has the ability to roll, rock, or slide.  This arrangement accommodates the change in length due to expansion and contraction (rolling or sliding end), and also the lifting or settling of the abutments (pinned or hinged end). 

In the case of the typical bridge shoes used on railroad bridges, both shoes look very similar.  It's actually only the base that is dissimilar.  They look enough alike that it's reasonable to use the same shoes on both ends of the bridge.

I know that Scale City Designs offered bridge shoes, or alternatively they are a detail that would be pretty easy to scratchbuild from styrene sheet and rod, or 3d print.

Jim

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×