Does anyone know a track software program that will work on a mac? Anyrail and SCARM do not accommodate MacBook Air.
Thanks,
JohnJr
|
Does anyone know a track software program that will work on a mac? Anyrail and SCARM do not accommodate MacBook Air.
Thanks,
JohnJr
Replies sorted oldest to newest
RailModeller Pro.
I agree, Railmodeller Pro for a MAC.
I got railmodeller pro for my macbook air and I actually have been able to use it, for basic layout shape and track plan it was relatively intuitive to use. There is a free version of the software you can download and try to see if you like it, it has limited number of track elements and can't do other functions, but can give a pretty good idea of how it works.
I used RM-Pro to design my 11' x 22' HO layout. Took several months as I kept adding & changing things. But I am really satisfied with the end result.
Not sure how they get it to work, I used window.
RR-Track v5 is the answer for all your toy or model train layout design headaches. No more templates to struggle with, no messy erasing and scribbling, no emergency table extensions propped on sawhorses, no last second hacking of the Xmas tree, just pop up the menus off this fully graphical software in the gauge of your choice and plan away. |
My Layout, less buildings, their software has most Lionel and MTH buildings but no woodland scenic. I did use atlas track and superstreets. There track selection is extensive.
Using RR-Track v5 with non-Windows Operating Systems | ||||||||
RR-Track is a Microsoft Windows application and as such, makes heavy use of of the Windows API. It is compatible with Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8/8.1, and Windows 10. However, it is possible to run RR-Track v5 using a different host operating system ( OS ). The two most popular alternate OS’s are LINUX, a modernized version of the old UNIX and the underlying host for most web servers, and the Macintosh OS, which also uses UNIX/LINUX as its underlying framework. For LINUX there are a large number of GUI-based distributions which we will not discuss in depth, one of the most popular is Ubuntu. The MacOS is currently at 10.9.x Mavericks. LINUX can be used on a large number of standard PCs ( we use it as an alternate boot OS on a laptop ), while the Mac OS is used only on PCs purchased from Apple. Without going into details, there are no plans to produce native LINUX or MacOS versions of RR-Track. Neither of the above OS’s directly support Windows applications but rather natively run applications using the window manager for their system. In order to run a MS Windows application under either LINUX or the MacOS you must have some other application installed which will take the native Windows API calls that RR-Track generates and translate ( or interpret ) them to the equivalent window system calls for the host OS. This not a simple task. However, since there are a large number of MS Windows applications that have no real equivalent in the LINUX or Mac worlds, software has been developed that allows MS Windows applications to coexist to a lesser or greater extent with native applications on other OS’s. There are a number of different ways to implement MS Windows on a non-Windows PC but the two most popular are:
There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods. Virtualization: the best VM manager we have used is that available from VMWare, the free VMWare Player for LINUX PCs and the very nice VMWare Fusion application for the MacOS. We use VMWare Professional ( this is not free ) in order to run virtual versions of MS Windows under a Windows 7 host OS so that we can test RR-Track v5.x in other Windows environments. With a multi-core processor in the host PC, you can assign the VM to run on one core and see little to no loss in performance. The primary advantage is that your Windows applications ( such as RR-Track v5 ) are running on real Windows so there are no compatibility issues. The primary disadvantage is you will need a valid version of MS Windows to install in the VM ( or VMs if you have more than one ); this is generally not free. WINE interpreter: we have installed WINE on both an Ubuntu 14.04 LINUX PC and a MacBook Pro using 10.9.2 Mavericks. If you are not a computer systems geek and don’t want to configure a lot of things yourself you can use the not-free-but-low-cost application Crossover from Codeweavers to set up ‘bottles’ for your Windows applications and configure WINE ( which Crossover installs itself ), or you can use the free application Play On LINUX or Play On Mac to do something similar ( Play On LINUX requires you to install WINE yourself ). The primary advantage of using WINE is cost -- free if you do it yourself or at most $30 for Crossover. The primary disadvantage is that RR-Track v5 is not 100 per cent compatible with WINE. There are a number of standard parts of the user interface that are ‘clunky’, such as all of the tab-switching, tearoff menus do not work at all, and opening layout files using what are supposed to be standard Windows file dialogs is problematic. However, 90 per cent of it does work. What Do We Recommend? One of the virtualization applications from VMWare. On the Mac, VMWare Fusion is a very slick package, will install Windows ( Win 7 in our test ) automatically from an ISO file, allows you to easily configure how much of the Mac resources you want to devote to the Windows VM ( we used 2 of 8GB of system memory ), and lets you run Windows applications in ‘unity’ mode where your favorite Windows applications, like RR-Track, can appear on the finder/launcher just like your Mac applications and do not have to run in an obvious ‘Windows’ window. Fusion costs about $60. |
I have an iMac and I run RailModeler Pro for Mac. I wasn't terribly with RailModeler so I put VMWare Fusion on my iMac Catalina and cloned my windows 10 pro PC then ended up with SCARM. I had a couple issues with model train simulator that turned out to be a bug with how they handled the sound card and I created a licensing issue when I cloned my windows machine but the SCARM people were great and things have been working great. I also had an issue the VMWare but again they we very quick to respond and all is well.
As a side note. My iMac is a 5K Retina, 27 inch, 2017, with a 3.4 GHz Quad Core i5, and loaded with 24 gig of memory. The additional memory is for two reasons; first better performance with VMWare and secondly (but more importantly) I run a CAD/Modeling type program "Fusion 360", natively under macOS, because I want to create some 3D printed structures for the layout.
So far I have been very happy with this configuration. It seems to be extremely stable and allows me to do both Windows & Apple on one box. I have also used the Mac extended screen with Airplay to a 50 inch Samsung with ok results, however if I continue with that I will probably go with the USB/Thunderbolt cable for a direct connection when working with the Fusion 360.
I hope this gives you some insight into what's available. BTW, I used VMWare in my professional life for over ten years and it has proven to be a very good product from a great company.(My personal opinion)
Jack
Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership