Skip to main content

We all know the #1 Amtrak corridor is the Northeast Corridor. However what are the #2 and Number 3 corridors for Amtrak in terms of train frequency and passenger count?  Would Amtrak ever Electrify the Corridor if more Trains were needed to deal with the increased Volume of business?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The California service and Empire service seem to be up there. 

Here's all the routes: https://www.narprail.org/site/...es/1038/trains-1.pdf

As far as electrifying it, they dont own anything but the NEC, and I doubt the freight RRs really want them stringing up wires, not that its cost effective anyways. With rare exception, the equipment is capable of operating at higher speeds than the tracks allow at the moment anyways. Aside from the NEC, there's only a few spots where 100+MPH operation is permitted. 

Last edited by Boilermaker1
Boilermaker1 posted:

The California service and Empire service seem to be up there. 

Here's all the routes: https://www.narprail.org/site/...es/1038/trains-1.pdf

As far as electrifying it, they dont own anything but the NEC, and I doubt the freight RRs really want them stringing up wires, not that its cost effective anyways. With rare exception, the equipment is capable of operating at higher speeds than the tracks allow at the moment anyways. Aside from the NEC, there's only a few spots where 100+MPH operation is permitted. 

I ride the San Joaquin regularly. About halfway up the valley, one can see the beginnings of the very controversial High Speed Rail.

What is interesting is the declining number of riders over the past few years on most of the routes, especially the shorter ones. The long distance routes seem to be holding their own or even increasing in some cases. A lot of these routes I have never heard of before, to tell the truth. Anyone have any idea why the sudden jump in number of riders on the Palmetto? There has to be a reason.

Never mind - I looked again. New stops at BWI airport and metropark. Maybe that could be an indicator of things for the future.

Last edited by tripleo
The long distance routes seem to be holding their own or even increasing in some cases.
A lot of these routes I have never heard of before, to tell the truth.
Anyone have any idea why the sudden jump in number of riders on the Palmetto? There has to be a reason.

Quite possibly the threat of Amtrak Funding cuts for long distance trains from this Administration in the White house? OR posibly People sick of the issues at the airports, cramped seats and leg room, and the "not so freindly skies" anymore on domestic flights.

This is an excellent research site:

https://www.narprail.org/our-i...idership-statistics/

Looking at ridership numbers the Pacific Surfliner service is number 2 with 2,500,000 passengers, California Capitols Service is number 3 with about 1,550,000 passengers, and followed by The Keystone Service at about 1,445,000 passengers.  The NEC is far ahead at around 12,000,000 passengers.  These are all 2016 ridership counts.

Last edited by GG1 4877

Amtrak has changed the service of the lakeshore limited. It used to be coach from Boston to Albany, At Albany it met up with the train from NY and then you would have your viewliner cars the rest of the way to Chicago. Now they have the viewliner cars right from Boston to Chicago. I have reservations on it in early May from Boston to Chicago. Much better now, and it leaves later from Boston 12:50pm. Coming from Portland I don't have to get up so early.

Last edited by eddie g

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×