Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

There has usually been a CHOICE of MTH contemporary 400's with the various Proto systems, OR the traditional locos with the BAL motors. Your engine is close to the original Lionel 400's. I have a Lionel Classics 2-400E made by Samhongsa in South Korea for MTH in then partnership with Richard Kughn. It has a BAL motor and a diecast air whistle (curiously with an electronic relay) in the tender. Bought it SEALED in the shipping carton from a well-known reputable dealer so it came that way from the factory.

Last edited by Tinplate Art

Only that I was told it was made by Mth and it’s in such pristine condition it looks like it was just manufactured.

Only that I was told it was made by Mth and it’s in such pristine condition it looks like it was just manufactured.

But again there’s absolutely no indication of anything other than Lionell on it

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

Something you might not have  noticed: there are SLIGHT differences in some of the castings for the MTH engines (steam chest for example). You would have to have them side by side to see (and the steam chest has 'MTH' embossed on the casting as well.  I have suffered this with parts for Harmon Challengers which use the 400E steam chest on the front mechanism. Even the two 'bosses' on the steam chest that mate to the frame do not match the originals.  I think that Mike was always good about marking his wares. Others not so much.

Jim

Mystery solved, but I would say think would be no way an original 400e could look that new no matter how it was stored.  Wouldn't 90 years of age have had to aged the finish? The fact that it looked so convincingly like an original is a testament to the quality of the work MTH did on these engines.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×