Skip to main content

Just rebuilt the smoke generator on a 2065 Hudson, and it smoked up a storm on the test bench! 

On the track, though, the smoke tends to not rise; rather, it just sort of blows along the top of the engine.  

I thought that the Elesco feedwater heater molded into the front of the boiler was breaking up the airflow over the smokestack and causing the smoke to be disrupted.  So, an experiment was in order!  I cut about a half inch of brass tubing, wedged it into the smokestack and sent the Hudson on its way.

Voila!  Cheerful little puffs of smoke. 

I may have to play with this a bit, see how much of an extension is needed...

Mitch

GEDC2973

GEDC2974

 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • GEDC2973
  • GEDC2974
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

M. Mitchell Marmel posted:

Just rebuilt the smoke generator on a 2065 Hudson, and it smoked up a storm on the test bench! 

On the track, though, the smoke tends to not rise; rather, it just sort of blows along the top of the engine.  

I thought that the Elesco feedwater heater molded into the front of the boiler was breaking up the airflow over the smokestack and causing the smoke to be disrupted.  ...

Mitch

GEDC2973

GEDC2974

 

Sounds just like the real thing with out the extension, but now the giraffes will no longer have smoke in their faces and that's a good thing. 

Allin posted:

Time to make smoke defectors?

That's a durned good question!  On the prototypes, they're intended to lift the smoke and improve driver visibility.  Do they have a similar effect at scale speeds?  Can someone with elephant-ear deflectors on their model locos provide some input here?

Steamer posted:

may be onto to something Mitch. I've got a few dead smoke units, including a 2055 with a 2065 front.

If they smoke up a storm while running but static, but don't smoke well in motion, try the tube trick and see what happens!   

Mitch

Doubtful anyone on this thread really cares, but here we go:

Prototypically Correct Alert!

The 2055 (no Elesco)/2065 small Hudsons were based upon - and a better sub-scale model than one would have thought  - the real ATSF 3460-class Hudsons. See photo below. The ATSF did not use smoke deflectors to lift the smoke at time - they used stack extensions. See photo, again.

You have stumbled into prototype practice - not usually associated with giraffes - and should not apply smoke deflectors. Your extension is, ah, "correct".

Now, the 2065 has both  a Worthington and an Elesco FWH - definitely Lionel PW fantasy time, but the real 3460's had the Worthington FWH pump on the pilot - again see photo - and the 2055/65 pilot area, engineer's side. There it is.

Note stack extension; it has a hinge as it was not used all the time. Remotely raised and lowered.

Note your 2055/2065 tool-and-die work; quite good (but they used a cheapened version of the scale NYC Hudson smokebox front). My childhood loco - still have it - was a 2055.

This had to be said. Giraffes? Well, I don't know, but the "giraffe goggles" made me smile.

ATSF3462

Attachments

Images (1)
  • ATSF3462
D500 posted:

Doubtful anyone on this thread really cares, but here we go:

(raises hand)  You have my undivided attention!

You have stumbled into prototype practice - not usually associated with giraffes - and should not apply smoke deflectors. Your extension is, ah, "correct".
Quote of the day! 
 

This had to be said. Giraffes? Well, I don't know, but the "giraffe goggles" made me smile.

Excellent writeup!  Many thanks!

Mitch

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×