Originally Posted by Eddie Marra:
To me, I feel quite the opposite. I think the artwork really served to fire the imagination of the child playing with the train,
Eddie, you're right on with this. If anyone had suggested back then that the box top art was "deceptive", he would have been laughed at - by the consumer as well as the toy maker. Everybody knew that there weren't trees and mountains and Indians on horses in that box.
When I was growing up on the farm in the 1950’s with five brothers and sisters, imagination played a very large role in how we played. Lines scraped in the gravel driveway with a stick were all that were needed to create a village of roads and houses, or, on another day, a spaceship complete with control rooms and cargo bays.
The same was true of my dad's old Ives train set that we set up on the attic floor, with no scenery and precious few accessories. A basic toy train set is the spark that can suggest a certain scenario, and allows the imagination to fill in the rest. A child’s imagination, if allowed, can create a far more amazing scenario than can be built by even the best scale modeler, or pictured by an artist on a box top. And as for the rest of us, well, it’s never too late.
In the world of theater, there is something called “a willing suspension of disbelief,” in which the audience agrees with the actors to suspend their critical examination of the sparse stage set, in favor of filling in the details with their imaginations. The result is much more enjoyable for everyone. This of course is what is called “pretending”, and it is the basis of all play.
Taking the box top art literally is a particular disease of the modern mind. It never would have occurred to earlier generations to do so. Instead, it was an invitation into the world of your own imagination - an invitation that is completely missed by the mind that can only see it as "deceptive" or "misleading".