Skip to main content

I've been trying to figure out how to connect tpc and transformer to a combo Lionel/MTH command environment and also use my BPC's and then the light bulb brightened.

I hooked all wiring up from a toggle switch to route power to the tpc instead of the tiu and at last no back feed of power to any parts that i did not want powered.

the light bulb part was when I realized if I used the t-2 terminal on the bpc and then change the 4 outputs from accessory-1 to accessory-2  it would not be able to back feed to the tiu success at last!

I serviced an old 2046 and tender set on track and applied power oh what joy to see the old smoke unit come alive and the e-unit buzz and that ozone smell old childhood memories once again were alive and well!

now yes I have lionel tmcc/legacy engines also mth ps-2 and proto-1 engines and when operating correctly I like the newer features but I found myself working more to make the gremlins go away than I was having fun just running trains! sorry folks the new engines do not have that good old 1950's smell but do have some really nice operating features and are nicely detailed but are from a new world and that is okay.

now I can enjoy running trains when things in the command world overwhelm me and need to just run and drift away into a world of long ago now isn't that what it's all about!

I know that others here are still running conventional as well and yet others have moved onto the newer command environment and no longer like the conventional engines and this is okay as all that matters is if we each enjoy what we run on our layout.

have a great train day all

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

StPaul,

 

   I am a lot like you in this regard.    I have TMCC/Legacy/DCS.        I have designed my layout to be able to run in conventional or command mode, depending on my mood.    I have a ZW-L and a ZW-C.       I often find myself simply grabbing the big handles and shutting down the Command modes and running as I did as a kid on our first Christmas layout in 1965.

Both my Lionel and MTH command gear runs just fine.  I just like the option to run the so called old fashioned way.

I like many others have both DCS and more recently TMCC  but I still enjoy running conventional. I have many Williams and Lionel postwar units and do sometimes enjoy taking them out for a run. I purchased this 665 just last Sunday at a small local train show for $90.00 ...it runs very well !  

Attachments

Videos (1)
IMG_7451

StPaul,

    Because I run my old Conventional Tin Plate Engines with the DCS Z4K Mode, I still get all the old smells from the Engines, and on top of that they even run smoother than ever before.  The Z4K Remote Commander Side Receiver allows this to happen,  even gives a little slow speed control to the old Conventional Engines, and operates everything  with the Hand Held Remote Control, or I can also run straight from the Transformer, if I so desire.  Having all the different options is great stuff.  No Forgotten Joy when set up in this manner.  Tin Plate Conventional via Remote Control, a little boys dream come true.

PCRR/Dave 

The latest purchase of the Conventional Post War CoCa Cola Train, operates fantastic in this manner also.

DSCN1784

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSCN1784
Last edited by Pine Creek Railroad

I have been running conventional through track voltage control in the dcs.  Its a lot of fun but not quite as smooth, starting at 5 volts.  I also put in a toggle to run through a conventional transformer.   

I have to say, running a marx commodore Vanderbilt with the dcs handheld is a hoot! !

I've been running "unconventional" since last May, with Battery-Powered, Remote-Control.

Other than some fairly simple wiring of the components, IMO it's much like conventional, only better.  I simply turn on the transmitter then the receiver/battery in the engine, turn a knob for the direction I want, and advance the throttle knob.

I had to read less than a dozen pages of installation instructions, which IMO made it easier than either DCS or TMCC.  Once the system was installed and running, I haven't had to look at the instructions at all.  Plus, there's no wiring at all presently on my layout.

I spend my time running trains, instead of pouring thru an operating manual, tracking down a wiring problem, or cleaning track and wheels.

It's simple and it works.  I can run a train for over 2 hours before charging, if I'm charging 1 engine I can run another. With 2 transmitters, I can run the mainline engine while switching with another engine.  If I had a transmitter for each engine I could run them all (if I had more hands!).

It's that F-N-R business that gets me. Harder to run something gracefully.

In my experience, it only takes a brief, minimum application of power to cycle a 3-position e-unit. In most cases the train does not move at all. I find that I rarely want to back up on my small, simple layout, so I leave the e-units turned off most of the time.

I too like the two position E-Units for the same reason as Andy.  However, with the electronic E units, the cycle is vastly smoother than traditional three position units.  So it's almost as simple as the two position cycle.  

My first conversion to an electronic E unit was way back in 1988.  I converted my C&O switcher to a Dallee E unit.  What a difference it made for me, particularly as an operator of an accessory filled layout. 

Last edited by Former Member
jhz563 posted:

I have been running conventional through track voltage control in the dcs.  Its a lot of fun but not quite as smooth, starting at 5 volts.  I also put in a toggle to run through a conventional transformer.   

I have to say, running a marx commodore Vanderbilt with the dcs handheld is a hoot! !

Yeah, I like running conventional w/ DCS . I'll tell ya, it's a whole lot more enjoyable when I upgraded to version 4.3, cause now it starts at 1 volt, very cool. I think the reason DCS originally started @ 5 volts was because most postwar loco's wouldn't budge until at least 5 volts was applied to the track.

Being inspired by this post, last night I was playing around with double heading small steamers locked in forward.  The trailing engine was a lionel dockside 0-6-0 from just a few years ago.  Unfortunately I found out that the front coupler does have as much swing as the rear coupler and the tender trailing truck of the lead engine kept getting derailed, even on 042 curves.  I tried to lock the docksider into reverse, but it didn't seem to work.  Anyway, it was still alot of fun, plus in conventional double heading, when one whistle goes off, they all go off!!

Penn-Pacific posted:
jhz563 posted:

I have been running conventional through track voltage control in the dcs.  Its a lot of fun but not quite as smooth, starting at 5 volts.  I also put in a toggle to run through a conventional transformer.   

I have to say, running a marx commodore Vanderbilt with the dcs handheld is a hoot! !

Yeah, I like running conventional w/ DCS . I'll tell ya, it's a whole lot more enjoyable when I upgraded to version 4.3, cause now it starts at 1 volt, very cool. I think the reason DCS originally started @ 5 volts was because most postwar loco's wouldn't budge until at least 5 volts was applied to the track.

My dcs is version 4.3 and still starts at 5 volts.  If yours starts at 1 volt then either I need to change a setting or something is wrong.  I would be much better if it started out at a lower initial voltage.  Looks like I just got a question for the dcs users group. 

I rather doubt I would have returned to trains at all were it not for command control.

However, I am not so keen on the undeniable and inexplicable things that seem to happen anytime a computer is connected to anything!

So these electronified and computerized toys are great . . . until something goes wrong!

Funny, I don't recall anything  going wrong with my Lionels in the 1950s! EVER!!!

They "just ran!" My DCS and TMCC engines? Well, "not so much."

Ahhhh . . . but when they run, they are such a joy!

well 3 for 3 the 2046 needs new power rollers and 2 rs-3's that are newer can motors in truck well 2 couplers are kaput so I ordered the rollers and coupler's [sp] should be here in a few days. 

have an email to another parts source for parts for my lionel 671 steam turbine.

as to the f-n-r that is easy use the lockout so only goes forward issue all gone, well for me anyways.  I had forgotten the fun running conventional engines.

thanks for all the replies have a fun train day all.

I still have all the PW Lionel my father and I acquired, starting with my first Scout set in 1958.  Before that, we had some Kusan and older Marx, so I did have some 3R O Gauge, and I can run my Kusan on the Gargraves, on a separate track, naturally.  I also have Lionel TMCC engines (25, including ERR conversions) and MTH PS1, PS2, PS3.  However, I do not have DCS or Legacy, and I am fine with that.  I am still building my "final" layout, can run multiple trains on 3 levels, but it looks like Elliot's, not much  scenery or a lot of buildings, just track and bridges, trestle, etc.  But, really enjoy running conventional. With all the numerous PW engines I have, and rolling stock, it is relaxing to simply use the ZWs, KWs and stay on my toes with the throttle.... sorta like running for real.  Keeping your eyes sharp and throttling as necessary.  The ZWCs and 180 bricks are great, but nothing like a couple of PW ZWs and knowing what throttle runs what engine and consist.  Exercise for the brain and wonderful memories.

Jesse  TCA

I always run in command. I have a lot of trains parked on powered sidings and ready to go. I build large consists to have fun with.

For testing, I got a MTH Z4000. I connected it to a loop of realtrax and plopped some three rail engines on it one at a time. It was fun watching them go thru their start ups and running them. It was enjoyable to have that throttle for control. So I learned why some guys don't wish to switch to command. I didn't enjoy it as much with smaller controllers until I got the Z4000.

I enjoy conventional operation.  I designed a few high amperage dc power packs and i use them to run modern era (can motor) locomotives that have had their boards removed, regardless of manufacturer.  

It is an interesting test of the mechanics (motor, gears, rods) to see how silently (or not) the new stuff will run. 

Lou N

 

StPaul posted:

well 3 for 3 the 2046 needs new power rollers and 2 rs-3's that are newer can motors in truck well 2 couplers are kaput so I ordered the rollers and coupler's [sp] should be here in a few days. 

have an email to another parts source for parts for my lionel 671 steam turbine.

as to the f-n-r that is easy use the lockout so only goes forward issue all gone, well for me anyways.  I had forgotten the fun running conventional engines.

thanks for all the replies have a fun train day all.

if you haven't contacted Jeff Kane for parts, he's the man.

www.ttender.com

Marty Fitzhenry posted:

Lou, always good to see you post.    Please keep me posted if you are going to be in my area.  I have a wall and Train America sign that still needs your signature.  For those who do not know Lou, he was a huge player in Right of Way and Train America.

Thanks Marty. I'm a little behind right now. I broke my wrist and am getting used to doing alot of stuff one handed. That doesnt excuse me from paying you a visit however. Soon I hope. 

Lou

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×