Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

One of the main reasons I stopped using Gargraves sectional curve track as they never were the advertised radius.  I'd get 0-72 or 0-42 and they would be slightly larger, you would never get a perfect circule.  I went to Ross section or bent my own curves after that.   So good luck trying to find out what you have.

Geojr posted:

Got it figured out. 42, 54 80 and 106 diameter.  Sure wish I was big enough to run the 106 curves. Thanks to all

Sounds good - the 80 ~ 21.25" and the 106 ~ 28 on the outside rail edge to outside rail edge.

You can use the big curves- the 106 are great to replace a long straight with a "snaky" of gentle curves

Here's what is would look like using 8- 106 curves are the O54 & O42 - about a 13'6" long layout - 6" center rail to center rail spacing

GeoJr

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • GeoJr
Moonman posted:

You can use the big curves- the 106 are great to replace a long straight with a "snaky" of gentle curves

Here's what is would look like using 8- 106 curves are the O54 & O42 - about a 13'6" long layout - 6" center rail to center rail spacing

GeoJr

 

Excellent suggestion when using sectional curved track; and, when using flex track as well.  Most layouts, especially modes sized ones, are too linear IMO; and, the substitution of gentle curves in lieu of straights works well.

Adriatic posted:

Not all companies used the outer rail/ties to measure like Lionel tubular.

Many (likely most) measure diameter/radius from the center between rails. In other scales I've only seen this method used; not the O.D..

I'm pretty sure GG uses track center to measure.

We only needed to choose a rail and get a chord length that I could compare to a software library with specifications provided by Gargraves - GG uses a "nominal" size circle also - not exactly the stated size

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×